공판절차에서 피해자의 지위에 관한 비교법적 고찰
The Comparative Study of the Victim’s Status in a Criminal Trial
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is concentrated on the comparative study of the criminal victim’s status in a criminal trial. Victims have the two different kinds of role – one is related to the examination of a witness and the other is the right to participate in the trial process as a so called stakeholder. Three legal systems are analyzed in this paper, besides South Korean criminal procedure law. Japan has the well balanced system to be equipped with both a guarantee of the victim’s free testimony and a chance for victims to state their opinions as interested parties. Meanwhile, German is the representative nation which offers victims the right to participate in a trial, including Privatklage and Nebenklage. The criminal justice system of U.S. is also known to have the average level of apparatus for victims, especially VIS and VOS. Compared with those countries, South Korean legal system lacks the victim’s right to participate in trial as a stakeholder, while leaning toward the use of victims for getting testimony. Under such a comparative analysis, this paper proposes to introduce the new system to enable victims active participation in a criminal trial into South Korean criminal procedure law.
Abstract
This paper is concentrated on the comparative study of the criminal victim’s status in a criminal trial. Victims have the two different kinds of role – one is related to the examination of a witness and the other is the right to participate in the trial process as a so called stakeholder. Three legal systems are analyzed in this paper, besides South Korean criminal procedure law. Japan has the well balanced system to be equipped with both a guarantee of the victim’s free testimony and a chance for victims to state their opinions as interested parties. Meanwhile, German is the representative nation which offers victims the right to participate in a trial, including Privatklage and Nebenklage. The criminal justice system of U.S. is also known to have the average level of apparatus for victims, especially VIS and VOS. Compared with those countries, South Korean legal system lacks the victim’s right to participate in trial as a stakeholder, while leaning toward the use of victims for getting testimony. Under such a comparative analysis, this paper proposes to introduce the new system to enable victims active participation in a criminal trial into South Korean criminal procedure law.
참고문헌 (22)
- 권순민, "공판절차에서의 피해자보호 방안에 대한 검토 -2007년 개정 형사소송법률을 중심으로-", 성균관법학, 20(2), pp.373~397 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김동진, "형사공판절차에서의 피해자보호, In 형사재판의 쟁점과 과제" (2008), 사법발전재단
- 김영철, "미국의 피해자 및 증인보호제도에 관한 연구", 해외파견검사논문집, 9 (1989)
- 고소제도에 관한 연구, "박상기", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1997)
- 박상식, "범죄피해자의 의견진술권에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.75~115 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 椎橋隆幸, "일본에서의 범죄피해자보호의 최근 동향", 법학연구, 22 (2000), 전북대 법학연구소
- 오경식, "범죄피해자 보호·지원에 관한 기본계획의 실천방향", 피해자학연구, 15(2), pp.5~32 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 윤종행, "公判段階에서의 被害者 保護方案", 비교형사법연구, 7(2(2)), pp.75~98 (2005), 한국비교형사법학회
- 이기헌, "미국의 범죄피해자 보호제도", 사회과학논총, 11 (1996), 명지대학교 사회과학연구소
- 이성호, "범죄피해자학" (2005), 21세기사
- 이은모, "형사절차에서의 피해자의 지위 및 보호방안", 한국교정학회소식, (10) (2000)
- 이주희, "형사소송절차상의 범죄피해자 이익보호와 그 이론적 배경에 관한 고찰－스위스법상의 범죄피해자 보호와 관련된 규정들을 중심으로－", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.387~412 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 증인보호제도에 관한 연구, "정진수", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1996)
- 정현미, "성폭력범죄 형사절차상 이차적 피해", 피해자학연구, (8) (2000), 한국피해자학회
- 하태훈, "증인 또는 피해자 보호제도", 피해자학연구, (4) (1996)
- 범죄피해자보호 관련법제 개선방안 연구, "황태정", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2006)
- Cassell, P. G, "Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act", Brigham Young University Law Review (2005)
- Dressler, J, "Criminal Procedure: Principles, Polices and Perspectives 3rd(ed)" (2006), Thomson West
- Mosteller, R. P, "Remaking Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Doctrine Under the Challenge of Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions", University of Illinois Law Review (1993)
- Pfeiffer, G, "StPO Kommentar 5. Auflage" (2005), Verlag C. H. Beck
- Zalman, M, "Criminal Procedure -Constitution and Society" (2005), Pearson Prentice Hall
- Zalman, M, "Essentials of Criminal Procedure" (2006), Pearson Prentice Hall