범죄피해자 진술권의 성격 및 내용에 관한 연구
The Characteristic and the Content of the Crime Victims’ Right for the Statement
0
조회
0
다운로드
28
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Until recent times, the crime victims have been considered as objects of the victim study in the main field of criminal law or penal law. From 2000 year, in Korea, the study on the crime victims has started to pay attention on the problem related with legal position and their rights in the criminal procedure, going beyond the economic and social consideration for the crime victims. So, the crime victims begin to emerge as subjects in the main field of criminal law. Especially, the crime victims’ right for the statement is one of the most crucial factors for their participation in the criminal procedure. The crime victims could appeal to the criminal court about their whole physical and mental damage caused by the crime. Furthermore, the crime victims’ right for the statement includes even the right for providing their opinion to the court in sentencing the punishment of the criminal offenders. However, though Korea’s constitution law guarantees widely the crime victims’ right for the statement, Korea’s criminal procedure law limits this right. Therefore, this criminal procedure needs to be reformed like Japan’s and Unites States’ ones. In conclusion, the crime victims’ right for the statement is the most essential right for preventing the victims’ second damage as well as for rehabilitating the criminal offender. This system of the right is more meaningful in providing the motive to make the citizens have the trust in the criminal law system.
Abstract
Until recent times, the crime victims have been considered as objects of the victim study in the main field of criminal law or penal law. From 2000 year, in Korea, the study on the crime victims has started to pay attention on the problem related with legal position and their rights in the criminal procedure, going beyond the economic and social consideration for the crime victims. So, the crime victims begin to emerge as subjects in the main field of criminal law. Especially, the crime victims’ right for the statement is one of the most crucial factors for their participation in the criminal procedure. The crime victims could appeal to the criminal court about their whole physical and mental damage caused by the crime. Furthermore, the crime victims’ right for the statement includes even the right for providing their opinion to the court in sentencing the punishment of the criminal offenders. However, though Korea’s constitution law guarantees widely the crime victims’ right for the statement, Korea’s criminal procedure law limits this right. Therefore, this criminal procedure needs to be reformed like Japan’s and Unites States’ ones. In conclusion, the crime victims’ right for the statement is the most essential right for preventing the victims’ second damage as well as for rehabilitating the criminal offender. This system of the right is more meaningful in providing the motive to make the citizens have the trust in the criminal law system.
참고문헌 (34)
- 권문택, "형법학 연구" (1985), 박영사
- 이재상, "신형사소송법" (2008), 박영사
- 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정법률 해설, 2007. 6", ~ (2007)
- 이재상, "형사절차상 피해자 보호방안" (1993), 한국형사정책연구원
- 강경래, "일본의 범죄피해자지원 및 보호", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.325~353 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 곽영길, "형사절차상 범죄피해자의 지위와 권리확보 방안에 관한 연구·현행 형사소송법상 범죄피해자 보호규정을 중심으로 in 한국공안행정학회보" (2008)
- 김동진, "형사공판절차에서의 피해자보호 in 형사재판의 쟁점과 과제" (2008), 사법발전재단
- 김성환, "범죄피해자지원의 헌법적 근거", 헌법학연구, 12(5), pp.463~492 (2006), 한국헌법학회
- 김용세, "피해자학의 발전과 피해자보호의 최신 동향", 피해자학연구, 10(1), pp.137~172 (2002), 한국피해자학회
- 김용세, "개정 형사소송법의 범죄피해자 보호규정", 피해자학연구, 15(2), pp.129~156 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 도중진, "형사절차에서 범죄피해자에 대한 재고찰", 피해자학연구, 10(1), pp.173~209 (2002), 한국피해자학회
- 류병관, "형사절차상 범죄피해자권리의 헌법적 보장에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.23~45 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 류병관, "범죄피해자보호에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 민영성, "피해자의 양형절차에의 참가와 의견진술", 저스티스, (93)통권 : 93, pp.164~179 (2006), 한국법학원
- 박상식, "범죄피해자의 의견진술권에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.75~115 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 백형구, "형사절차상 범죄피해자의 보호?형사소송법 개정법률의 해설을 중심으로 in 고시계" (2008)
- 윤종행, "공판단계에서의 피해자 보호, 성폭력상담실 공동 학술행사·형사절차에서의 피해자보호 방안" (2005), 충남대학교 법학연구소
- 이용식, "형사피해자 지위에 대한 소고", 피해자학 연구, 14(1) (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 이용식, "형벌론 형사실체법에서 피해자의 역할", 피해자학 연구, 15(1) (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 이용식, "유죄답변협상제도의 도입에 대한 비판적 검토-피해자의 관점에서 제기하는 반론-", 형사법연구, 19(2), pp.207~228 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 차용석, "범죄피해자 법적 지위 일반론", 법학연구, 27 (2007), 한국법학회
- 천진호, "범죄피해자 권리 확보 방안", 피해자학 연구, 15(1) (2007), 한국피해자 학회
- 황정익, "범죄피해자보호와 경찰활동 개선방안", 한국공안행정학회보, (28) (2007), 한국공안행정학회
- Alice Koskela, "Victim’s Rights Amendments: An Irresistible Political Force Transforms the Criminal Justice System" (1997), Idaho L. Rev.
- Douglas E. Beloof, "Constitutional Implications of crime victims as participants", Cornell U. Rev, (283) (2003)
- Edna Erez, "Victime Voice Statements and Sentencing: Integrating Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Principles in Adversarial Proceedings", Crim. Law Bulletin, 40(5) (2004)
- Ilana Subar, "Emphasizing Victims’ Rights at the sentencing phase of criminal proceeding", Maryland L. Lev, (726) (1996)
- Peggy M. Tobolowsky, "Victim Participation in The Criminal Justice Process: Fifteen Years After the President’s Task Force on Victims of Crime", New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement, 21 (1999)
- Steven G. Gey, "Justice Scalia’s death penalty", Fla. St. U. L. Rev, 75 (1992)
- Vivian Berger, "Payne and Suffering-A Personal Reflection and a Victim-Centered Critique", Fla. St. U. L. Rev, 22 (1992)
- Wayne A. Logan, "through the past darkly: A survey of the uses and abuses of Victim Impact Evidence in capital trials", Ari. L. Rev, 145 (1999)
- William R. Peterson, "Voice of the Victims: Capital Punishment and a Declaration of Life", Rev. Litig, 27, pp.769~ (2008)
- ??誠, "犯罪被害者等の意見陳述?について", 法新報, 113 (2007)
- "Constitutional Amendment Network(NVCAN)"[URL]