본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국제형사재판소에서의 피해자배상 판결에서의 배상유형과 배상양식

Types and Modalities of Reparations in the International Criminal Court's Ruling on Victims Reparations

조상혁
한국피해자학회 (Korean Association Of Victimology)|2020.08|피해자학연구 (Korean Journal of Victimology)|제28권 제2호|pp. 79-114|DOI http://doi.org/10.36220/kjv.2020.28.2.79

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

국제형사재판소배상유형배상양식루방가 사건카탕가 사건알 마흐디 사건International Criminal Courttypes of reparationsmodalities of reparationsLubanga caseKatanga caseAl Mahdi case

초록

국제형사재판소(ICC)가 설립된 이후 피해자배상명령이 내려진 것은 루방가(Lubanga) 사건, 카탕가(Katanga) 사건 및 알 마흐디(Al Mahdi) 사건 등 총 3개의 사건이다. 본 논문은 이 세 개의 사건에서 국제형사재판소의 재판부가 어떠한 배상유형(개인적 배상, 집단적 배상 그리고 개인적 배상 및 집단적 배상)을 어떤 이유로 선택하였는지 그리고 어떠한 배상양식(원상회복, 금전배상, 재활 및 기타 배상양식)을 어떤 이유로 선택하였는지에 대해서 고찰하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 첫 번째 배상사건인 루방가 사건에서는 재판부는 피해자신탁기금의 권고를 따랐고, 개인적 배상을 배제하였다. 그러나 두 번째 배상사건인 카탕가 사건과 세 번째 배상사건인 알 마흐디 사건에서는 재판부는 더 이상 피해자신탁기금의 권고를 따르지 않았으며, 그 대신에 개인적 배상과 집단적 배상을 둘 다 인정하였다. 현재까지는 개인적 배상의 경우에는 금전배상의 배상양식을 선택하였으며, 집단적 배상의 경우에는 재활 서비스와 상징적 조치의 배상양식을 선택하였다.

Abstract

Since the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the order for reparations for victims has been issued in a total of three cases: the Lubanga case, the Katanga case and the Al Mahdi case. The purpose of this paper is to examine what types of reparations (personal reparation, collective reparation and personal reparation and collective reparation) was chosen by the International Criminal Court in these three cases and what modalities of reparations (recovery, monetary compensation, rehabilitation and other reparation forms) was chosen for. In the first case of reparation, the Lubanga case, the court followed the recommendation of the Trust Fund for Victims and ruled out personal reparation. But in the second case of Katanga and the third case of Al Mahdi, the court no longer followed the recommendation of the Victims Trust Fund, and instead recognized both personal and collective reparations. So far, the modality of monetary compensation has been chosen for personal reparation, and the modalities of rehabilitation services and symbolic measures has been selected for collective compensation.

참고문헌 (62)

  1. 김형구, "국제형사재판절차에서의 피해자의 법적 지위", 국제법평론, (24) (2006)
  2. 김재호, "국제형사재판소의 피해자배상절차에 관한 고찰 - 특히 루방가 전쟁범죄사건의 상소부판결을 중심으로 -", 피해자학연구, 27(3), pp.49~71 (2019), 한국피해자학회[DOI]
  3. 도중진, "전쟁범죄와 피해자보호에 관한 고찰 - 국제군사재판제도와 피해자배상제도의 발전과정을 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 29(1), pp.71~106 (2016), 법학연구소[DOI]
  4. 이관형, "국제형사재판소에서의 피해자 배상 제도", 석사, 법학과 국제법전공, pp.2014
  5. 이진국, "국제형사재판절차에서 피해배상의 가능성과 한계", 형사정책연구, 26(4), pp.1~22 (2015), 한국형사법무정책연구원
  6. 조상혁, "국제형사재판소의 피해자 배상명령의 필수요소에 대한 검토", 홍익법학, 21(1), pp.153~182 (2020), 법학연구소[DOI]
  7. A. Balta, "Trial aund (Potential) Error: Conflicting Visions on Reparations Within the ICC System", International Criminal Justice Review, 29(3) (2019)
  8. C. M. Bassiouni, "The Protection of ‘Collective Victims’ in International Law, International Protection of Victims" (1988), Eres
  9. E. Baumgartner, "Aspect of Victims Participation in the Proceedings of the International Criminal Court", International Review of the Red Cross, 90 (2008)
  10. R. B. Bilder, "The Role of Apology in International Law and Diplomacy", Virginia Journal of International Law, 46 (2006)
  11. I. Bottigliero, "Redress for Victims of Crimes under International Law" (2004), Leiden
  12. T. van Boven, "International Humanitarian Law Series" (2009), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
  13. A. M. de Brouwer, "Reparation to Victims of Sexual Violence – Possibilities at the International Criminal Court and at the Trust Fund for Victims and Their Families", Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007)
  14. D. Donat-Cattin, "Article 75 – Reparations to Victim, Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court – Observers’ Notes, Article by Article", ~ (1999)
  15. P. R. Dubinsky, "Justice for the Collective – The Current Limits of the Human Rights Class Action", Michigan Law Review, 102 (2004)
  16. E. Dwertmann, "The Reparation System of the International Criminal Court :Its Implementation, Possibilities and Limitations" (2010), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
  17. E. Gillard, "Reparation for Violations of International Humanitarian Law", International Review of the Red Cross, 851 (2003)
  18. S. Gloppen, "Human Rights in Development – Yearbook 2001" (2003), The Hague
  19. C. Jorda, "The Status and Role of the Victim, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court – A Commentary" (2002)
  20. H. Küpper, "Kollective Rechte in der Wiedergutmachung von Systemunrecht, vol. 2" (2004)
  21. P. Lewis, "Reparation to Victims, The International Criminal Court – Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence" (2001), Ardsley
  22. C. McCarthy, "Reparations and Victim Support in the International Criminal Court", ~ (2012)
  23. F. Mckay, "Reparations Appropriately in the ICC Statute, International Crimes, Peace and Human Rights – The Role of the International Criminal Court" (2000), Ardsley
  24. L. Mekhemar, "The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court – A Challenge to Impunity" (2001), Aldershot
  25. C. Muttukumaru, "Reparation to Victims, The International Criminal Court :The Making of the Rome Statute - Issues, Negotiations, Results" (1999), The Hague Kluwer
  26. E. H. Riedel, "Damages, Encyclopedia of Public International Law Vol. 1" (1992)
  27. N. Roht-Arriaza, "Reparations, Decisions and Dilemmas", Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 27 (2004)
  28. D. Shelton, "Remedies in International Human Rights Law" (2005)
  29. R. Teitel, "Transitional Justice" (2000)
  30. B. Timm, "The Legal Position of Victims in the Role of Procedure and Evidence, International and National Prosecution of Crimes under International Law" (2001)
  31. "Convention on the Rights of the Child", ~
  32. "European Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes", ~ (1983)
  33. "ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility", ~
  34. "Paris Principles", ~
  35. "Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims", ~
  36. "Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court", ~
  37. "Rules of Procedure and Evidence", ~
  38. "The Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law", ~
  39. "19 Merchants v. Colombia, 2004 Inter-Am. Ct. H. R", ~ (2004)
  40. "Baririos Altos Case, Reparations, Inter-Am. Ct. Of H. R", ~ (2001)
  41. "Cantoral Benavides Case, Reparations, Inter-Am. Ct. of H. R", ~ (2001)
  42. "Garrido and Baigorria v. Argentina, Reparations, Inter-Am., Ct. of H. R", ~ (1998)
  43. "Hood v. United Kingdom, ECtHR", ~ (1999)
  44. The Rabat Report: Concept and Challenges of Collective Reparations, "International Center for Transnational Justice", ~ (2009)
  45. "Loayza Tamayo v. Peru, Reparations, Inter-Am. Ct. Of H. R", ~ (1998)
  46. "McCallum v. The United Kingdom, ECtHR", ~ (1990)
  47. "Paniagua Morales et. al. Case, Inter-Am. Ct. of H. R", ~ (1998)
  48. "Plan de Sánchez Massacre v. Guatemala, 2004 Inter-Am. Ct. H. R", ~ (2004)
  49. Report of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, , ~ (1998)
  50. "Rochela Massacre v. Columbia, Reparations and Costs", ~ (2007)
  51. "Sadak and others v. Turkey, ECtHR", ~ (2001)
  52. "‘Street Children’ Case, Reparation, Inter-Am. Ct. of H. R", ~ (2001)
  53. "The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, Trial Chamber VIII, Reparations Order", ~ (2017)
  54. "The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga, Trial Chamber II, Order for reparations pursuant to Article 75 of the Statute", ~ (2017)
  55. "The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, TFV, Trust Fund Project of 13 February 2017 for Service-based Collective Reparations", ~
  56. "The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, TFV, URGENT-Filing regarding symbolic collective reparation projects with Confidential Annex: Draft Requests for Proposals", ~ (2016)
  57. "The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, The Appeal Chamber, Amended Order for Reparations in Judgment on the appeals against the “Decision establishing the principles and procedure to be applied to reparations” of 7 August 2012", ~ (2015)
  58. "The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, The Appeal Chamber, Judgment on the appeals against the “Decision establishing the principles and procedure to be applied to reparations” of 7 August 2012", ~ (2015)
  59. "The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Trial Chamber I, Decision establishing the principles and procedure to be applied to reparations", ~ (2012)
  60. "The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Trial Chamber II, Order approving the proposed plan of the Trust Fund of Victims in relation to symbolic collective reparation", ~
  61. "The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Trial Chamber II, Order approving the proposed programatic framework for collective service-based Reparations submitted by the Trust Fund for Victims", ~ (2017)
  62. "Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras, Compensatory Damages, Inter-Am. Ct, H. R", ~ (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

국제형사재판소의 피해자배상절차에 관한 고찰 - 특히 루방가 전쟁범죄사건의 상소부판결을 중심으로 -김재호, 도중진한국피해자학회 · 피해자학연구2019 · 제27권 제3호국제형사재판소의 피해자신탁기금의 배상집행 권한조상혁법학연구소 · 아주법학2020 · 제14권 제2호국제형사재판소의 피해자 배상명령의 필수요소에 대한 검토조상혁법학연구소 · 홍익법학2020 · 제21권 제1호전쟁범죄와 피해자보호에 관한 고찰 - 국제군사재판제도와 피해자배상제도의 발전과정을 중심으로 -도중진법학연구원 · 법학논총2016 · 제29권 제1호전환기 정의와 국제형사재판소의 역할 - 치유와 회복을 통한 정의, 평화, 인권의 길 -김진사단법인 법조협회 · 법조2023 · 제72권 제1호国際刑事裁判所(ICC)における被害者の位置づけ필립 오스틴한국피해자학회 · 피해자학연구2015 · 제23권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

가정 내 정서적 폭력에 대한 개념적 이해와 피해자 보호문성원pp. 1-44공동체적 관점으로서의 전환적 사법에 관한 연구김혜경pp. 45-78대인폭력 피해아동을 위한 외상중심치료 프로그램 내 가족개입 요소에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰정명신, 김기현pp. 115-150집단 괴롭힘 피해가 다문화 청소년의 비행에 미치는 영향: 차별적 접촉과의 상호작용효과를 중심으로김중곤pp. 151-170범죄피해자보호기금제도의 개선방안원혜욱pp. 171-217
원문 보기