Blending in English and English Loanwords: An Optimality Theoretic Approach
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to provide some aspects of blends within the framework of Correspondence Theory. Blends can largely be categorized into two groups: those with and without overlapping segments. In the cases of overlapping blends, the identical segment has a role as the switch point, while in the latter the switch points are placed on prosodic or morphological boundaries such as foot, syllable, and rhyme. Although the alignment constraints control these switch points in English blends, Align(BW, BW(Σ)) is not considered in an analysis of English loanword blends, as the Korean phonology system is exempted from word stress. In particular, in the cases of non-overlapping blends, Align(BW, σ) plays a crucial role in demarcating splinters of the two source words. In addition, the minimal word requirement for forming a new blended form causes the number of syllables to be at least two. This paper sheds light on setting some foundation for an analysis and comparing the disparity of the processes of forming blends in English and English loanwords.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to provide some aspects of blends within the framework of Correspondence Theory. Blends can largely be categorized into two groups: those with and without overlapping segments. In the cases of overlapping blends, the identical segment has a role as the switch point, while in the latter the switch points are placed on prosodic or morphological boundaries such as foot, syllable, and rhyme. Although the alignment constraints control these switch points in English blends, Align(BW, BW(Σ)) is not considered in an analysis of English loanword blends, as the Korean phonology system is exempted from word stress. In particular, in the cases of non-overlapping blends, Align(BW, σ) plays a crucial role in demarcating splinters of the two source words. In addition, the minimal word requirement for forming a new blended form causes the number of syllables to be at least two. This paper sheds light on setting some foundation for an analysis and comparing the disparity of the processes of forming blends in English and English loanwords.
참고문헌 (16)
- Arnoff,M, "Word Formation in Generative Grammar" (1981), MIT
- Bat-El,O, "Selecting the Best of the Worst,In the Grammar of Hebrew Blends", Phonology, 13, pp.283~328 (1996)
- Bauer,L, "English Word formation" (1983), Cambridge University
- Benua,L, "dentity Effects in Morphological Truncation", pp.77~136 (1995), University of Massachusetts
- 정진완, "Justification for Anchor-Right in morphological and phonological processes", 음성음운형태론연구, 13(1), pp.151~168 (2007), 한국음운론학회
- 홍성훈, "An Optimality Theoretic Analysis of English Blends", 언어, 30(3), pp.551~582 (2005), 한국언어학회
- 진미주, "English Blends: A Descriptive Study of their Distributional Patterns and Prosodic Features", 언어연구, 20(3), pp.195~231 (2005), 한국현대언어학회
- Kager,R, "Optimality Theory" (1999), Cambridge University
- Kubozono,H, "Phonological Constraints on Blending in English as a Case for Phonology morphology Interface", Yearbook of Morphology, 3, pp.1~20 (1990)
- McCarthy, J, "Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity", UMOP, 18, pp.249~384 (1995)
- Park, Yong Chan, "New Words in 2003" (2003), National Research Institute of Korean Language
- Prince, A, "Optimality Theory,In Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar" (1993), University and University of Colorado
- Prince, A, "Optimality Theory,In Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar" (2004), Blackwell Publication
- Seo, Hong-Won, "Blending in English,In An Optimality Theoretic Approach", AELLK, Presented at Fall Conference (2006)
- Seo, Hong Won, "Aspects of Phonology and Morphology of the English Loanwords into Korean", 박사, pp.2008
- Spencer, A, "Phonology" (1996), Blackwell Publishing