본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일인칭 복수 대명사의 절차적 의미와 관련성

The Procedural Meaning of First Person Plural Pronouns and Relevance

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper aims to look at what the first person plural pronouns ‘we' and ‘wuli' mean in English and Korean, respectively, the information that they encode and the effect that the information has. This paper also shows how the hearer uses that encoded meaning to interpret the pronouns in utterance contexts. I shall be adopting the framework of relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986/95) and demonstrating that pronouns are fundamentally procedural in nature, encoding the information about the inferential process that the hearer should use. Guided by the overarching principle of relevance, it is argued that the hearer resolves reference assignment pragmatically as a part of the relevance-theoretic comprehension procedure, drawing information from many possible sources in the process.

Abstract

This paper aims to look at what the first person plural pronouns ‘we' and ‘wuli' mean in English and Korean, respectively, the information that they encode and the effect that the information has. This paper also shows how the hearer uses that encoded meaning to interpret the pronouns in utterance contexts. I shall be adopting the framework of relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986/95) and demonstrating that pronouns are fundamentally procedural in nature, encoding the information about the inferential process that the hearer should use. Guided by the overarching principle of relevance, it is argued that the hearer resolves reference assignment pragmatically as a part of the relevance-theoretic comprehension procedure, drawing information from many possible sources in the process.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 김정남, "한국어 대명사 ‘우리’의 의미와 용법", 한국어 의미학, 13, pp.257~274 (2003), 한국어의미학회
  2. 남기심, "표준 국어 문법론" (1985), 탑출판사
  3. 윤재학, "단수적 용법의 ‘우리’", 언어와 정보, 7(2), pp.1~30 (2003), 한국언어정보학회
  4. 이한규, "한국어 대명사 ‘우리’", 담화와 인지, 14(3), pp.155~178 (2007), 담화·인지언어학회
  5. 정경옥, "한국어에 있어서의 “우리”의 사용에 대하여", 한국어교육, 16(3), pp.403~422 (2005), 국제한국어교육학회
  6. Bach, K., "Pragmatics and the philosophy of language, In The handbook of pragmatics", pp.463~487 (2004), Blackwell
  7. Blakemore, D, "Semantic constraints on relevance" (1987), Blackwell
  8. Blakemore, D., "Relevance and linguistic meaning" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  9. Breheny, R, "Pragmatic analyses of anaphoric pronouns: Do things look better in 2-D?, In Two-dimensional semantics", pp.22~37 (2006), Oxford University Press
  10. Carston, R, "Thoughts and utterances" (2002), Blackwell
  11. Fauconnier, G., "Mental spaces" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  12. Grice, H. P., "Studies in the way of words" (1989), Harvard University Press
  13. Grimberg, M. L., "Against rigidity: An investigation of the semantics and pragmatics of indexicality", 박사, pp.1996
  14. Hedley, P., "Anaphora, relevance and the conceptual", procedural distinction, 2007
  15. Ifantidou-Trouki, E, "Sentential adverbs and relevance", Lingua, 90, pp.69~90 (1993)
  16. Kaplan, D., "Demonstratives, themes from Kaplan, In Themes from Kaplan", pp.481~563 (1989), Oxford University Press
  17. Nunberg, G, "Indexicality in contexts", Paper delivered at the Conference on Philosophy and Cognitive Science (1990)
  18. Nunberg, G., "Indexicality and deixis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, pp.1~43 (1993)
  19. The deferred interpretation of indexicals and proper names, "Powell, G.", UCL, 143~172 (1998)
  20. Recanati, F., "Direct reference: From language to thought" (1993), Blackwell
  21. Recanati, F., "What is said", Synthése, 125, pp.75~91 (2001)
  22. Reference, procedures and implicitly communicated meaning, "Scott, K.", UCL, 275~301 (2008)
  23. Sperber, D, "Relevance" (1995), Blackwell
  24. Wilson, D, "Linguistic form and relevance", Lingua, 90, pp.1~25 (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)