본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

형법상 친족간 특례규정과 피해자의 의사

Express Provisions among Relatives and Consent of Victim

0

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In criminal act, there are some express provisions which have special legal effect in criminality and punishability of act by the reason of relationship among relatives. The provisions includes adultery, some kinds of crimes committed on lineal ascendant, killing or abandoning baby, special exceptions to relatives in harboring criminal, destruction of evidence and some property crimes. It is remarkable that the legal effect of some of those express provisions is related with the consent of victim. This paper tried to classify the express provisions based on the relationship among relatives and study correlation between the provisions and consent of victim and the possibility and appropriateness of the provisions. To point out the systematical problems and disharmony of legal effect of the provisions and suggest some of legal improvements is the purpose of this paper. When Property crimes committed among relatives, it is required to take consent of victim into consideration positively in a viewpoint that the law do not enter home. So it is not reasonable to give a legal effect to remit whole punishment because remittal of punishment does not reflect consent of victim. In this case, it is suggested that the crimes should be prosecuted only upon complaint or should not be prosecuted over the express objection of the victim, to take consent of victim into consideration. It would be an answer to the criticisms pointing out the problems like ignoring consent of victim and unbalance of criminal procedure.

Abstract

In criminal act, there are some express provisions which have special legal effect in criminality and punishability of act by the reason of relationship among relatives. The provisions includes adultery, some kinds of crimes committed on lineal ascendant, killing or abandoning baby, special exceptions to relatives in harboring criminal, destruction of evidence and some property crimes. It is remarkable that the legal effect of some of those express provisions is related with the consent of victim. This paper tried to classify the express provisions based on the relationship among relatives and study correlation between the provisions and consent of victim and the possibility and appropriateness of the provisions. To point out the systematical problems and disharmony of legal effect of the provisions and suggest some of legal improvements is the purpose of this paper. When Property crimes committed among relatives, it is required to take consent of victim into consideration positively in a viewpoint that the law do not enter home. So it is not reasonable to give a legal effect to remit whole punishment because remittal of punishment does not reflect consent of victim. In this case, it is suggested that the crimes should be prosecuted only upon complaint or should not be prosecuted over the express objection of the victim, to take consent of victim into consideration. It would be an answer to the criticisms pointing out the problems like ignoring consent of victim and unbalance of criminal procedure.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김일수, "형법각론(제6판)", pp.27~ (2004), 박영사
  2. 오영근, "형법각론", pp.34~ (2005), 박영사
  3. 이재상, "형법각론(제5판 보정판)", pp.24~ (2006), 박영사
  4. 이형국, "형법각론", pp.25~ (2007), 법문사
  5. 정영일, "형법각론(개정판)", pp.14~ (2008), 박영사
  6. 임웅, "형법각론(개정판)", pp.37~ (2003), 법문사
  7. 이정원, "형법각론(공개1판)", pp.868~ (2008)
  8. "제247조 (친족간 범행의 특례)", ~
  9. "제311-12조 (친족간의 범행)", ~
  10. "제244조 (친족간의 범죄에 관한 특례)", ~
  11. 장진호, "현대사회와 친족상도례의 모순점과 개선방향", 법조협회, (463), pp.201~ (1995)
  12. "제777조 (친족의 범위)", ~
  13. "제779조 (가족의 범위)", ~
  14. "사기죄·공갈죄(제218조)", ~
  15. "횡령죄·배임죄(제225조)", ~
  16. "장물죄(제228조)", ~
  17. "손괴죄(제235조)", ~
  18. "제208조 (친족간의 범행)", ~
  19. "대법원 1993.10.22. 선고 93도1620 판결", ~ (1993)
  20. "헌법재판소 2001.10.25. 선고 2000헌바60 결정", ~ (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)