본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

明ㆍ淸代 福建 宗族의 祖上祭祀 認識 ― 祈福避禍信仰과 관련하여 ―

The ancestor-worship services and shamanic fortune belief in Ming-Qing Fujian Lineage

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In Fujian, where folk faiths were prevalent, the ancestor-worship services was an official ceremony with strong religious nature in themselves. Also they were rituals that the lineage or family members could participate in relatively easily to know about their ancestors and identify their family lines, while acquiring family-related cultures and passing them down on. In Fujian where armed conflicts against nearby villages and lineages had occurred frequently while the custom of the lineage or family members living collectively was prevalent, various folk faiths had existed to ease off present tensions and possible future unrests. In these circumstances, ancestors became the object of worship as well as a god who would protect the family and lineage beyond that of respect, and people came to pray to their own ancestors for giving them fortune and protection from misfortunes, which had formerly been what people had prayed for in folk faiths. And the belief ‘The souls of ancestors are immortal and exert persistent effects on their descendents.’ made it possible. Each family and lineage wanted to thrive, and its own prosperity depended on the increase of the number of its own lineage or family members. It requires high birth rate and low death rate. And they thought, it was the matter belonging to spirits, so people prayed for helps to the souls of their ancestors which, they supposed, might know well about the circumstances their descendents were facing. Furthermore, every family and lineage competed to produce more national test passers than others. Under these severe competitions, with strong beliefs in Literacy Guardian Spirit playing important roles in them, people came to think that their ancestors’ souls living in spiritual world would know their descendents’ situation very well and give them helps. Also with a belief that, in achieving great fortunes, Wealth-God and Fengshui (Wind&Water) was important, they prayed to the guardian spirit and tried to possess good one, but they also believed that their ancestors’ helps were also important in it. These beneficial-for-all views toward ancestor-worship services and theology was a vital survival mechanism that people had acquired from living in the times of high tension and conflicts. Unlike common folk faiths, the ancestor-worship services had the principle of “keep close who deserves to be close”, and certain limits had existed on who could be worship-service attenders and worship-service hosts. The presence of the limits on the worship-service attenders and worship-service hosts implies that only those attenders and hosts could enjoy the exclusive rights to the Fortunes Attained-by-ancestors’ Assistance, and the Helps Given-By-Ancestors. For this reason, in the worshiping services, it became the most important to decide who would be the ancestor that deserves to be given services and who would hold the ceremony. Also it was the most important principle in unifying lineage or family members into one. Later, the principle of “keep close who deserves to be close” had been systematized further as the theories of the strict blood line, the inheritance of ancestors’ spirits and the possession of the same soul between ancestors and descendents, while the belief took roots that the spirits of ancestors would accept the services held by the descendents who succeeded their blood lines, sharing the same spirit. Also, people made it possible to unify lineage or family members together by describing the father-son and ancestor-descendent as ‘one soul’ or ‘one body’, distinguishing themselves from others. The principle of repaying, which had originated from the principle that ancestor-worship services should be given to the greatly contributed ancestors, applied to the ancestor-worship services of each family and lineage. Especially, the act of repaying done by descendents for the contributions done by parents had been systemized as filial-ism, and people were encouraged to practice it when their parents were alive and continue it by holding funeral ceremony and worship services after they had passed away. But if the deed of filial-ism, in other words, respecting their parents they were alive and holding worship services after they died, should have carried out only because of the sense of obligation and responsibility, it must have been difficult to continue it, Thus, the scholars and governors devised the logic of repaying, which has religious orthodox creeds such as Fortunes Attained-by-ancestors’ Assistance, and the Helps Given-By-Ancestors, and Retributive Calamity. These logical reasoning of repaying played as a core principle for unifying lineage members, leading them to build ancestrial shrines and hold worship services regularly for their ancestors like the lineage originators who had done great contributions for the family or lineageThe premise needed for ancestor-worship services to be continued is the presence of the descendents who would not forget the ancestors' and contributions. Since Zhu Xi (朱熹; 1130 ~ 1200) of the Chinese Southern Song dynasty argued about the principle “The nature of the spirits is the nature of the mind.”, the question of how to let the lineage or family members remember and pay service to their ancestrial contributions had been an important matter. Zhang Yue in the Ming dynasty insisted that, in the ancestor-worship services, the pivotal figure must be the eldest paternal descendent based on the lineage regulations. Later, Yi Guangdi in the Qing dynasty proposed that the gentry should take the pivotal role in the services, evoking the changes in the service holders. It shows the growing importance of the gentry and the changes in the social structure within the lineage and family as the results of social conflicts around the late Ming and early Qing dynasties. Thinking that the gentry was a social status one could achieve whereas the eldest paternal descendent is the one given by birth, it meant opening up the status of the eldest paternal descendent to all the members belonging to that lineage or family, showing that the consensus among the members became much more important in uniting the lineage or family members because the gentry was only a part of the ones who would not forget their ancestors’ contributions. Ancestor-worship service is a form of social courtesy, which was recognized and used as the most effective means of governing by Chinese rulers from the early stage. Thus the codes related to the services can be found in many family regulations or lineage regulations. As time passed, the bonds between the members would grow weak, and severe competitions might occur even within a family or a lineage, causing various social unrests. So, they tried solve these social problems, by encouraging people to hold ancestor-worship services and implement the lineage regulations or family regulations. In other words, they controled families by enforcing people to include the description of ancestors as a living entity who could abide in shrines and tombs looking down and caring their descendents with so much impacts on their offsprings, asking them to implement the obligations or prohibitions written in the family and lineage regulations, and instigating them to hold ancestor-worship services to refresh the feeling of the presence of the ancestrial spirits and their patronages. Also among the gentry and intellectuals, many of them believed in the presence of their ancestors overseeing them. So they participated in the ancestor-worship services regularly while seeking to amend their conducts to produce great social achievements, and these are one of the notable things concerning the ancestor worship services.

Abstract

In Fujian, where folk faiths were prevalent, the ancestor-worship services was an official ceremony with strong religious nature in themselves. Also they were rituals that the lineage or family members could participate in relatively easily to know about their ancestors and identify their family lines, while acquiring family-related cultures and passing them down on. In Fujian where armed conflicts against nearby villages and lineages had occurred frequently while the custom of the lineage or family members living collectively was prevalent, various folk faiths had existed to ease off present tensions and possible future unrests. In these circumstances, ancestors became the object of worship as well as a god who would protect the family and lineage beyond that of respect, and people came to pray to their own ancestors for giving them fortune and protection from misfortunes, which had formerly been what people had prayed for in folk faiths. And the belief ‘The souls of ancestors are immortal and exert persistent effects on their descendents.’ made it possible. Each family and lineage wanted to thrive, and its own prosperity depended on the increase of the number of its own lineage or family members. It requires high birth rate and low death rate. And they thought, it was the matter belonging to spirits, so people prayed for helps to the souls of their ancestors which, they supposed, might know well about the circumstances their descendents were facing. Furthermore, every family and lineage competed to produce more national test passers than others. Under these severe competitions, with strong beliefs in Literacy Guardian Spirit playing important roles in them, people came to think that their ancestors’ souls living in spiritual world would know their descendents’ situation very well and give them helps. Also with a belief that, in achieving great fortunes, Wealth-God and Fengshui (Wind&Water) was important, they prayed to the guardian spirit and tried to possess good one, but they also believed that their ancestors’ helps were also important in it. These beneficial-for-all views toward ancestor-worship services and theology was a vital survival mechanism that people had acquired from living in the times of high tension and conflicts. Unlike common folk faiths, the ancestor-worship services had the principle of “keep close who deserves to be close”, and certain limits had existed on who could be worship-service attenders and worship-service hosts. The presence of the limits on the worship-service attenders and worship-service hosts implies that only those attenders and hosts could enjoy the exclusive rights to the Fortunes Attained-by-ancestors’ Assistance, and the Helps Given-By-Ancestors. For this reason, in the worshiping services, it became the most important to decide who would be the ancestor that deserves to be given services and who would hold the ceremony. Also it was the most important principle in unifying lineage or family members into one. Later, the principle of “keep close who deserves to be close” had been systematized further as the theories of the strict blood line, the inheritance of ancestors’ spirits and the possession of the same soul between ancestors and descendents, while the belief took roots that the spirits of ancestors would accept the services held by the descendents who succeeded their blood lines, sharing the same spirit. Also, people made it possible to unify lineage or family members together by describing the father-son and ancestor-descendent as ‘one soul’ or ‘one body’, distinguishing themselves from others. The principle of repaying, which had originated from the principle that ancestor-worship services should be given to the greatly contributed ancestors, applied to the ancestor-worship services of each family and lineage. Especially, the act of repaying done by descendents for the contributions done by parents had been systemized as filial-ism, and people were encouraged to practice it when their parents were alive and continue it by holding funeral ceremony and worship services after they had passed away. But if the deed of filial-ism, in other words, respecting their parents they were alive and holding worship services after they died, should have carried out only because of the sense of obligation and responsibility, it must have been difficult to continue it, Thus, the scholars and governors devised the logic of repaying, which has religious orthodox creeds such as Fortunes Attained-by-ancestors’ Assistance, and the Helps Given-By-Ancestors, and Retributive Calamity. These logical reasoning of repaying played as a core principle for unifying lineage members, leading them to build ancestrial shrines and hold worship services regularly for their ancestors like the lineage originators who had done great contributions for the family or lineageThe premise needed for ancestor-worship services to be continued is the presence of the descendents who would not forget the ancestors' and contributions. Since Zhu Xi (朱熹; 1130 ~ 1200) of the Chinese Southern Song dynasty argued about the principle “The nature of the spirits is the nature of the mind.”, the question of how to let the lineage or family members remember and pay service to their ancestrial contributions had been an important matter. Zhang Yue in the Ming dynasty insisted that, in the ancestor-worship services, the pivotal figure must be the eldest paternal descendent based on the lineage regulations. Later, Yi Guangdi in the Qing dynasty proposed that the gentry should take the pivotal role in the services, evoking the changes in the service holders. It shows the growing importance of the gentry and the changes in the social structure within the lineage and family as the results of social conflicts around the late Ming and early Qing dynasties. Thinking that the gentry was a social status one could achieve whereas the eldest paternal descendent is the one given by birth, it meant opening up the status of the eldest paternal descendent to all the members belonging to that lineage or family, showing that the consensus among the members became much more important in uniting the lineage or family members because the gentry was only a part of the ones who would not forget their ancestors’ contributions. Ancestor-worship service is a form of social courtesy, which was recognized and used as the most effective means of governing by Chinese rulers from the early stage. Thus the codes related to the services can be found in many family regulations or lineage regulations. As time passed, the bonds between the members would grow weak, and severe competitions might occur even within a family or a lineage, causing various social unrests. So, they tried solve these social problems, by encouraging people to hold ancestor-worship services and implement the lineage regulations or family regulations. In other words, they controled families by enforcing people to include the description of ancestors as a living entity who could abide in shrines and tombs looking down and caring their descendents with so much impacts on their offsprings, asking them to implement the obligations or prohibitions written in the family and lineage regulations, and instigating them to hold ancestor-worship services to refresh the feeling of the presence of the ancestrial spirits and their patronages. Also among the gentry and intellectuals, many of them believed in the presence of their ancestors overseeing them. So they participated in the ancestor-worship services regularly while seeking to amend their conducts to produce great social achievements, and these are one of the notable things concerning the ancestor worship services.

참고문헌 (73)

  1. "《禮記》;《論語》;《左傳》", ~
  2. "霞峰章美堂 19세손 鐘祿 訂"
  3. "光緖抄本"
  4. "臺灣文獻匯刊 제3집 제9책" (2009), 九州出版社․厦門大學出版社
  5. 泉州桃源莊氏族譜匯編編纂委員會, "泉州桃源莊氏族譜匯編" (1999), 廈門大學出版社
  6. 南靖縣, "莊氏族譜" (1996), 莊氏族譜編纂委員會
  7. 重修, "莊氏族譜"
  8. 上海圖書館編, "中國家譜資料選編ㆍ家規族約卷" (2013), 上海古籍出版社
  9. 多賀秋五郞, "宗譜の硏究(資料篇)" (1960), 東洋文庫
  10. 周振鶴 撰集, "聖諭廣訓集解與硏究" (2006), 上海書店出版社
  11. 柴鑣 修, "嘉靖5年(1526) 刻本" (1973), 臺北市永春文獻社
  12. "乾隆22年修" (1972), 永春文獻社
  13. "乾隆《汀州府志》" (2004), 方志出版社
  14. 李光地, "欽定四庫全書本", 榕村續集
  15. 李瀷, "星湖僿說"
  16. 李寶嘉, "난세", pp.23~ (2003), 일송-북
  17. 李贄, "焚書 1", pp.301~ (2004), 한길사
  18. 張岳, "小山類稿" (2000), 福建人民出版社
  19. 陳澧, "한대사상사전" (2013), 그물
  20. 陳淳, "文淵閣四庫全書"
  21. 賀長齡, "清代經世文編" (1992), 中華書局
  22. M.로이, "古代 中國人의 生死觀" (1989), 知識産業社
  23. 김기환 편저, "중국인의 속담" (2008), 명문당
  24. 김병환, "유가의 친친윤리와 묵가의 겸애윤리에 대한 다윈주의적 독해", 범한철학, 54(3), pp.31~61 (2009), 범한철학회
  25. 도민재, "儒敎 祭禮의 構造와 意味- 忌祭를 중심으로", 동양철학연구, 42(42), pp.225~255 (2005), 동양철학연구회
  26. 류근성, "다윈의 관점에서 본 유가도덕의 기원과 발전", 유교사상문화연구, (46), pp.41~64 (2011), 한국유교학회
  27. 모리스 프리드만, "수정판 東南部 中國의 宗族組織" (1996), 一潮閣
  28. 박성규, "주자의 제사론- 귀신 문제를 중심으로 -", 동방학지, (121), pp.129~163 (2003), 국학연구원
  29. 앙리 마스페로, "古代中國" (1995), 까치
  30. 양경곤, "중국사회 속의 종교" (2011), 글을읽다
  31. 窪德忠, "중국종교사" (1996), 한울
  32. 원정식, "종족 형성의 공간과 문화 - 15․16세기 복건 신현을 중심으로" (2012), 위더스북
  33. 元廷植, "淸代 福建社會 연구 : 淸 전·중기 민남사회의 변화와 宗族活動", 박사, 동양사학, pp.1996
  34. 원정식, "近世 東아시아의 國家와 社會" (1998), 지식산업사
  35. 원정식, "淸 中期 閩南의 械鬪 盛行과 그 背景", 東洋史學硏究, 56 (1996)
  36. 이종서, "高麗後期 이후 ‘同氣’ 理論의 전개와血緣意識의 變動", 동방학지, (120), pp.1~35 (2003), 국학연구원
  37. 조한욱, "문화를 보면 역사가 달라진다" (2007), 책세상
  38. 차혜원, "저울 위의 목민관 : 명대 지방관의 인사고과와 중국사회" (2010), 서강대학교 출판부
  39. 카이윙 초우(周啓榮), "예교주의, 17․18세기 중국 지식인의 윤리, 학문, 종족의 담론" (2013), 모노그래프
  40. 廖慧贞, "家丧葬习俗中广东梅州客家人的祖先崇拜", 東京文學, (10) (2011)
  41. 李小燕, "客家祖先崇拜文化——以粤东梅州为重点分析" (2005), 民族出版社
  42. 常建華, "明代宗族組織化硏究" (2012), 故宮出版社
  43. 徐斌, "明淸鄂東宗族與地方社會" (2010), 武漢大學出版社
  44. 徐揚杰, "중국가족제도사" (2000), 아카넷
  45. 徐朝旭, "论儒学对民问神明信仰的影响 — 以闽台民间神明信仰为例", 宗教学研究, (2) (2007)
  46. 徐曉望, "福建民間信仰源流" (1993), 福建敎育出版社
  47. 徐曉望, "試論淸代閩粤鄕族械鬪", 學術硏究, 5 (1989)
  48. 蘇黎明, "泉州家族文化" (2000), 中國言實出版社
  49. 蘇黎明, "2013 閩南文化論壇" (2013), 提出論文
  50. 吳巍巍, "近代來華傳敎士筆下的閩南民系文化特徵初探", 西岸文史集刊, 2 (2013)
  51. 吳賢俊, "宗攘的生存與希望 : 論風水的存在價值", 臺灣源流, 50-51 (2010)
  52. 劉大可, "傳統與變遷 : 福建民衆的信仰世界" (2011), 社會科學文獻出版社
  53. 李文治, "中國宗法宗族制和族田義莊" (2000), 社會科學文獻出版社
  54. 李穎, "閩地祖先崇拜習俗的西方映像", 閩江學院學報, 29(1) (2008)
  55. 林國平, "福建民間信仰" (1993), 福建人民出版社
  56. 张根强, "论清代宗族法三位一体的社会控制功能", 西安文理学院学报(社会科学版), 10(2) (2007)
  57. 田昌五, "中國封建經濟史(4)" (1996), 齊魯書社‧文津出版社
  58. 鄭鏞, "閩南民間諸神探尋" (2009), 河南人民出版社
  59. 鄭振滿, "中國社會經濟史硏究", pp.1~ (1998)
  60. 陳啓鍾, "明淸閩南宗族意識的建構與强化" (2009), 廈門大學出版社
  61. 陳啟鐘, "風生水起——論風水對明清時期閩南宗族發展的影響", 新史學, 13(3) (2007)
  62. 陳支平, "近500年來福建的家族社會與文化" (1991), 三聯書店上海分店
  63. 淸水盛光, "中國族産制度攷" (1983), 岩波書店
  64. 彭維斌, "中國東南民間信仰的土著性" (2010), 廈門大學出版社
  65. 羅竹風, "漢語大詞典" (1990), 漢語大詞典出版社
  66. 何淑宜, "香火 : 江南士人與元明時期祭祖傳統的建構" (2009), 稻鄕出版社
  67. 黃振良 編著, "閩南文化叢書之七 民間信仰" (2009), 河洛文化事業股分有限公司
  68. 侯杰, "中國民衆宗敎意識" (1994), 天津人民出版社
  69. 滋賀秀三, "中國家族法の原理" (1981), 創文社
  70. John MacGowan, "Christ or Confucius, Which? or, The story of the Amoy mission" (1889), London Missionary Society
  71. John MacGowan, "Sidelights on Chinese Life" (1907), Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & CO., Limited
  72. "주희 주자어류(해제)진순의 혈통 제사론과 그 문제점"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)