본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

명말 청초 經史학파의 專制的 帝國체제 비판 ― 黃宗羲와 顧炎武를 중심으로 ―

The debate of political reform by the school of classics and history in 17th-century China

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper to study the Confucian thought of political reform in 17th-century, the period of radical changes shifting from Ming dynasty to Qing dynasty, laid emphasis on its basic structure and varieties between the ideas of Huang zongxi(黃宗羲) and Gu yanwu(顧炎武). Two great Confucian scholars to construct practical learning(實學) trend, had many common factors in their political economy and empirical method. Both emphasized the decentralization of political power against the long political tradition of emperor's despotic rule in Chinese empire. The ideas of political decentralization were logically based on the joint rule of sovereign and subject, and Confucian principle of government for the people, which was called public-minded world view(公天下). They also emphasized Confucian tradition of public opinion(淸議) to criticize political realities as the dynamics of political reform. But there are also considerable varieties between two scholars as representatives of the school of classics and history. Having priority to empirical learning, Gu presented relatively moderate reform plans, for instance, the decentralization and efficiency of local administration, the renovation of public morals and autonomy of great kinship. Then Huang as Yangming(陽明) philosopher, advocated the radical reform of central government as well as local administration, and inquire into the devices to govern by law and institutionalize the public opinion, even though the ideas were very immature. Finally, it's told that the two scholars' reform ideas were motivated by innovate the empire's defence of border, whose military frailty was caused by the excessive centralization of empire's political system.

Abstract

This paper to study the Confucian thought of political reform in 17th-century, the period of radical changes shifting from Ming dynasty to Qing dynasty, laid emphasis on its basic structure and varieties between the ideas of Huang zongxi(黃宗羲) and Gu yanwu(顧炎武). Two great Confucian scholars to construct practical learning(實學) trend, had many common factors in their political economy and empirical method. Both emphasized the decentralization of political power against the long political tradition of emperor's despotic rule in Chinese empire. The ideas of political decentralization were logically based on the joint rule of sovereign and subject, and Confucian principle of government for the people, which was called public-minded world view(公天下). They also emphasized Confucian tradition of public opinion(淸議) to criticize political realities as the dynamics of political reform. But there are also considerable varieties between two scholars as representatives of the school of classics and history. Having priority to empirical learning, Gu presented relatively moderate reform plans, for instance, the decentralization and efficiency of local administration, the renovation of public morals and autonomy of great kinship. Then Huang as Yangming(陽明) philosopher, advocated the radical reform of central government as well as local administration, and inquire into the devices to govern by law and institutionalize the public opinion, even though the ideas were very immature. Finally, it's told that the two scholars' reform ideas were motivated by innovate the empire's defence of border, whose military frailty was caused by the excessive centralization of empire's political system.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. "答李紫瀾書, in 亭林文集 권3, 顧炎武詩文集", pp.68~
  2. "直言, in 日知錄集釋권19", pp.447~
  3. "取士下, in 明夷待訪錄", pp.17~19
  4. De Bary, W. T., "Chinese Despotism and the Confucian Ideal―a Seventeenth-century View, in Chinese Thought & Institutions", pp.173~ (1957), The Univ. of Chicago Press
  5. 高柄翊, "黃宗羲의 新時代 待望論", 동양사학연구, 4 (1970)
  6. 顧炎武, "亭林文集 권1, 顧亭林詩文集"
  7. 顧炎武, "日知錄集釋 권13"
  8. 顧炎武, "日知錄集釋 권17"
  9. 顧炎武, "日知錄集釋 권29"
  10. 顧炎武, "日知錄集釋 권7"
  11. 顧炎武, "日知錄集釋 권8"
  12. 顧炎武, "日知錄集釋 권9"
  13. 顧炎武, "亭林文集 권1, 顧亭林詩文集"
  14. 顧炎武, "亭林文集 권4, 顧亭林詩文集", pp.103~ (1976), 中華書局
  15. 顧炎武, "亭林文集 권5, 顧亭林詩文集"
  16. 顧炎武, "亭林文集, 권3, 顧亭林詩文集"
  17. 顧炎武, "正始, in 日知錄集釋", pp.307~ (1984), 世界書局
  18. 高準, "黃梨洲政治思想硏究", pp.52~71 (1967), 中國文化學院
  19. 溝口雄三, "中國の公と私", pp.17~19 (1995), 硏文出版
  20. 溝口雄三, "中國前近代思想の屈折と展開", pp.267~273 (1980), 東京大學出版會
  21. 唐凱麟, "走向近代的先聲―中國早期啓蒙倫理思想硏究", pp.93~94 (1993), 湖南敎育출판사
  22. 閔斗基, "중국의 전통적 정치상―封建ㆍ郡縣 논의를 중심으로", 진단학보, 29 (1966)
  23. 閔斗基, "淸代 幕友制와 행정질서의 성격, in 중국근대사 연구", pp.165~166
  24. 閔斗基, "청대 生監層의 성격―특히 그 계층적 個別性을 중심으로―, in 중국근대사 연구", pp.104~119 (1980), 일조각
  25. 步近智, "東林學派與明淸之際的實學思潮, in 中日實學史硏究", pp.108~115 (1992), 中國社會科學출판사
  26. 徐定寶, "黃宗羲評傳", pp.73~147 (2002), 南京大學출판사
  27. 小野和子, "明季黨社考―東林黨と復社―", pp.445~447 (1996), 同朋社出版
  28. 小野和子, "黃宗羲", pp.67~98 (1967), 人物往來社
  29. 辛冠潔, "黃宗羲的經世實學, in 明淸實學思潮史", pp.948~950 (1989), 齊魯書社
  30. 沈善洪, "黃宗羲全集序, in 黃宗羲全集󰡕 제1책", pp.11~
  31. 王家儉, "魏源年譜", pp.105~ (1981), 中央硏究院 近代史硏究所
  32. 汪漢卿, "中國法律思想史", pp.125~132 (1993), 中國科學技術大學출판사
  33. 陸寶千, "淸代思想史", pp.7~9 (1983), 廣文書局
  34. 李明友, "一本萬殊 ― 黃宗羲的哲學與哲學史觀", pp.243~283 (1994), 人民출판사
  35. 李成珪, "중국제국의 분열과 통일―後漢해체 이후 隋․唐 통일의 형성과정을 중심으로―, in 역사상의 분열과 재통일(상)" (1992), 일조각
  36. 錢穆, "中國近三百年學術史(上)", pp.144~149 (1972), 臺灣商務印書館
  37. 周可眞, "顧炎武年譜", pp.350~351 (1987), 臺灣商務印書館
  38. 周可眞, "明淸之際新仁學―顧炎武思想硏究", pp.97~99 (2006), 中國大百科全書출판사
  39. 朱義祿, "黃宗羲與中國文化", pp.64~65 (2001), 貴州人民출판사
  40. 陳祖武, "顧炎武―淸初務實學風的倡導者, in 明淸實學思潮史", pp.1102~
  41. 何貽焜, "亭林學術述評" (1976), 正中書局
  42. 何宗, "明末淸初文人結社硏究" (2003), 南開大學출판사
  43. 許蘇民, "顧炎武評傳" (2006), 南京大學출판사
  44. 黃秀政, "顧炎武與淸初經世學風" (1987), 臺灣商務印書館
  45. 黃宗羲, "留別海昌同學序, in 南雷詩文集 上, 黃宗羲全集, 제10책" (1993)
  46. 黃宗羲, "題辭, in 明夷待訪錄, 黃宗羲全集, 제1권" (1985), 浙江古籍출판사
  47. 黃宗羲, "明夷待訪錄", ~
  48. 黃宗羲, "留書, 黃宗羲全集 제11책", pp.5~6 (1993)
  49. 侯外廬, "中國早期啓蒙思想史", pp.165~ (1958), 人民출판사
  50. "동아시아문화사논고" (1997), 서울대출판부
  51. "중국근대사연구", pp.211~215 (1980), 일조각

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)