1848년 漕糧 海運의 중단, 敎案, 그리고 河運에의 ‘집착’
The Interruption of Sea Transport of Tribute Grain, the Qingpu Incident, and an ‘Obsession’ with the Canal-Grain Transport System in 1848
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzes the sea transport of tribute grain, which was enforced in 1848, but was interrupted a year later. This analysis includes its background and the process of interruption, which allows us to examine the various forces responsible for its interruption even as the necessity for the sea transport gradually emerged. The 19th century has been known as ‘the Grand Canal crisis’ due to its serious problems connected with the Yellow River. The canal-grain transport system that properly functioned during the 15th-18thcenturies began to face a serious crisis from the start of the 19th century. This crisis lead not only to the tribute grain transportation controversy but also to threats to the Qing's governing system in the 19th century. In 1848, the sea transport of tribute grain was required as a desperate alternative to overcome the crisis, but at the same time, it provided a way to seek potential utilization from the newly developing maritime world. Twenty-two years previously, the sea transport of tribute grain was enforced in 1826, but it was also interrupted a year later. In comparing this previous interruption with the one in 1848, a clear distinction becomes apparent, namely, the one-month delay in departure from Shanghai. This delay occurred due to the Qingpu incident in Qingpu county of Jiangsu Province, on March 8, 1848 (February 4 on the lunar calendar). Through analyzing the Qingpu incident – its background, process, and results- three facts can be attested. First, the Western missionary center was moving from Guangzhou to Shanghai with the desire to enter inner China. Second, the Western powers such as England were effectively using the interruption in sea grain transport to pressure the Qing to sit at the negotiation table which favored the Western powers. Lastly, the Qing was facing serious problems due to the unemployment of canal boatmen as the Qing switched its transportation system from canal-grain transport to sea-grain transport. Additionally, the process of handling the sea transport of tribute grain and the Qingpu incident revealed the Qing officials' particular psychological world that was deeply rooted in fear and resistance toward the instability or uncontrollability of the ocean world. As a result, until late 19th century, many Qing officials continued to insist on reverting to the canal-grain transport system, even though the Grand Canal essentially had lost its transportation function. Therefore, this argument for the canal-grain transport system represents the deeply embedded conservativism and an ‘obsession’ with the traditional 400-year-old transport system, the canal-grain transport system.
Abstract
This paper analyzes the sea transport of tribute grain, which was enforced in 1848, but was interrupted a year later. This analysis includes its background and the process of interruption, which allows us to examine the various forces responsible for its interruption even as the necessity for the sea transport gradually emerged. The 19th century has been known as ‘the Grand Canal crisis’ due to its serious problems connected with the Yellow River. The canal-grain transport system that properly functioned during the 15th-18thcenturies began to face a serious crisis from the start of the 19th century. This crisis lead not only to the tribute grain transportation controversy but also to threats to the Qing's governing system in the 19th century. In 1848, the sea transport of tribute grain was required as a desperate alternative to overcome the crisis, but at the same time, it provided a way to seek potential utilization from the newly developing maritime world. Twenty-two years previously, the sea transport of tribute grain was enforced in 1826, but it was also interrupted a year later. In comparing this previous interruption with the one in 1848, a clear distinction becomes apparent, namely, the one-month delay in departure from Shanghai. This delay occurred due to the Qingpu incident in Qingpu county of Jiangsu Province, on March 8, 1848 (February 4 on the lunar calendar). Through analyzing the Qingpu incident – its background, process, and results- three facts can be attested. First, the Western missionary center was moving from Guangzhou to Shanghai with the desire to enter inner China. Second, the Western powers such as England were effectively using the interruption in sea grain transport to pressure the Qing to sit at the negotiation table which favored the Western powers. Lastly, the Qing was facing serious problems due to the unemployment of canal boatmen as the Qing switched its transportation system from canal-grain transport to sea-grain transport. Additionally, the process of handling the sea transport of tribute grain and the Qingpu incident revealed the Qing officials' particular psychological world that was deeply rooted in fear and resistance toward the instability or uncontrollability of the ocean world. As a result, until late 19th century, many Qing officials continued to insist on reverting to the canal-grain transport system, even though the Grand Canal essentially had lost its transportation function. Therefore, this argument for the canal-grain transport system represents the deeply embedded conservativism and an ‘obsession’ with the traditional 400-year-old transport system, the canal-grain transport system.
참고문헌 (53)
- (明)王在晉 撰, "通漕類編" (1970), 學生書局
- 中華書局, "梁廷枏 撰", 1997
- 陶澍, "陶澍集 上 : 奏疏․日記" (1998), 岳麓書社
- 福祿堪, "靑浦事件信稿", 近代史資料, 2 (1957)
- 沈桐生 輯, "光緖政要" (1991), 江蘇廣陵古籍出版社
- 王雲五 編, "道咸同光四朝奏議 第2冊" (1970), 商務印書館
- 魏源, "魏源全集 第12冊" (2004), 岳麓書社
- 李星沅, "李文恭公遺集", 李文恭公遺集
- 李鴻章, "李鴻章全集ㆍ電稿" (1985), 上海人民出版社
- 張壽鎬, "皇朝掌故彙編" (1964), 文海出版社
- 朱壽明 編, "光緖朝東華錄 (1)" (1984), 中華書局
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "道光年間海運漕糧史料選輯 (上)", pp.2~ (1995), 歷史檔案
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "道光年間海運漕糧史料選輯 (下)", pp.3~ (1995), 歷史檔案
- 包世臣 撰, "包世臣全集: 中衢一勺" (1994), 黃山書社
- 何良棟 輯, "近代中國史料叢刊 第77輯" (1972), 文海出版社
- 賀長齡, "淸經世文編" (1992), 中華書局
- "明經世文編" (1962), 中華書局
- "元史", 中華書局標點本
- "浙江海運全案重編", 고려대학교 도서관 귀중본 소장
- "淸代起居注冊ㆍ道光朝" (1985), 聯合報文化基金會國學文獻館
- "淸史稿", 中華書局標點本
- 淸實錄, (1986), 中華書局影印本
- "British Parliamentary Papers XII" (1857)
- Hosea Ballou Morse, "International Relations of the Chinese Empire" (1918), Longmans, Green, and Co
- Hugh Hamilton Lindsay, "Report of proceedings on a voyage to the northern ports of China in the ship Lord Amherst" (1834), B. Fellowes
- 김능욱, "중국 개항도시를 걷다" (2013), 현암사
- 정철웅, "코끼리의 후퇴" (2011), 사계절
- 조영헌, "대운하와 중국 상인: 회양지역 휘주 상인 성장사, 1415-1784" (2011), 민음사
- 表敎烈, "淸中期 遭運 개혁론 연구 : 江浙지방에서의 經世論 擡頭와 관련하여", 박사, 동양사학, pp.1995
- 孫幾伊, "河徙及其影響" (1935), 金陵大學中國文化硏究所
- 倪玉平, "淸代漕糧海運與社會變遷" (2005), 上海書店出版社
- 姚漢源, "京杭運河史" (1998), 中國水利水電出版社
- 李文治, "淸代漕運" (1995), 中華書局
- 谷光隆 編, "東亞同文書院大運河調査報告書" (1992), 汲古書院
- 山本進, "淸代の市場構造と經濟政策" (2002), 名古屋大學出版會
- 星斌夫, "大運河 : 中國の漕運" (1971)
- 星斌夫, "明淸時代交通史の硏究" (1971), 山川出版社
- Dodgen, Randall A, "Controlling the Dragon: Confucian Engineers and the Yellow River in Late Imperial China" (2001), Honolulu, Univ. of Hawai'i Press
- Fairbank, John King, "Trade and Diplomacy on the China Coast: The Opening of the Treaty Ports, 1842-1854" (1953), Harvard University Press
- Hinton, Harold C, "The Grain Tribute System of China(1845-1911) (晩淸漕運制度)" (1956), Harvard Univ. Press
- Johnson, Linda, "Cooke, Shanghai : From Market Town To Treaty Port, 1074-1785" (1995), Stanford University Press
- Leonard, Jane Kate, "The Univ. of Michigan" (1996), The Univ. of Michigan, Center for Chinese Studies
- Leung, Yuen-sang, "The Shanghai taotai :linkage man in a changing society, 1843-90" (1990), University of Hawaii Press
- Polachek, James, "The Inner Opium War" (1992), Harvard University Press, Council on East Asian Studies
- Standaert, N, "Handbook of Christianity in China, Volune Two: 1800-present" (2010), Brill
- Wakeman, Frederic, "Strangers at the Gate : Social Disorder in South China, 1839-1861" (1966), University of California Press
- 조영헌, "明 後期 ‘短命’으로 끝난 漕糧의 海運과 그 의미", 역사교육, (100), pp.259~291 (2006), 역사교육연구회
- 표교열, "嘉道期 漕運改革論의 經世論的 展開 ― 魏源의 海運論과 그 特性을 중심으로 ―", 東洋史學硏究, 54 (1996)
- 倪玉平, "李星沅與“靑浦敎案”", pp.5~ (2003), 史學月刊
- 章巽, "元史論集" (1984), 人民出版社
- Leonard, Jane Kate, "Christianity in China : early Protestant missionary writings" (1986), Harvard Univ. Press
- Mann, Jones Susan, "The Cambridge History of China vol.10, Late Ch'ing,1800-1911, Part Ⅰ" (1978), Cambridge University Press
- Zhang, Xin, "Is the Opium War a Defining Moment in Chinese History? A View from Trade Route, Interregional Trade, and the Lower Yangzi", Modern China Studies, 17(2) (2010)