본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선시대 소송제도와 外知部의 활동

The Trial System of Joseon, and Activities of the Weji-bu(外知部) entities

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Attempted in this article is to determine the characteristics and defining qualities of the Joseon era trial system, in terms of its differences from its Chinese counterpart as well as some similarities with it. First discussed here are various aspects of Joseon trials, and also the apparent nature of the trial system itself. Subsequently examined is the Weji-bu(外知部) entities, who served as trial experts and also representatives in court. The point raised in this article is that a years-old notion which had believed that Korean people in the past had a rather conservative mind-set which tried to avoid trials at all cost could not be farther from the truth and therefore is nothing but a misconception. In the Joseon period legal fights and lawsuits which intended to protect civil rights and properties took place rather frequently in local regions. We can see that from not only the trial system itself of the time but also various records including 『Minjang Chibu-chaek(民狀置簿冊)』, which was a compilation of civil appeals(訴狀) submitted to local prefects with the intention to launch lawsuits. This article strongly argues that such trend of actually ‘favoring lawsuits(好訟)' could be attributed to the open atmosphere of the Joseon society that did not see such actions as a vice at all, and also the Joseon system that allowed civilians to launch lawsuits relatively freely. Also examined here, alongside characteristics of the Joseon trial system, is the role that was played by the Weji-bu(外知部) entities, who were virtually ‘representatives in court.’ Examination of their actions shows us that the service of these entities had been required even since the early days of the dynasty. They involved themselves in the proceedings of the case, and represented the interests of their clients in the court. Some of them even served in the capacity of scriveners(代書人) or lawyers which we can see today, as they were well versed in legal codes and were also armed with necessary information usually involved in court actions. The Joseon government was not fond of their activities, as it was the government’s general view that these Weji-bu entities were inciting legal fights and were practicing law in an illegal fashion. They usually punished them heavily, even in the latter half of the dynasty. As a result, just like the Songsa(訟師: Lawsuit consultants) entities who operated during the Ming anc Qing periods, Weji-bu entitles had to go beyond legal boundaries and covertly operate. Although the modern adversarial system based upon lawyers’ service in court was only established after the Gabo-year reforms, it is clear that the Weji-bu tradition of Joseon served as a platform for such a new establishment of a modern legal system.

Abstract

Attempted in this article is to determine the characteristics and defining qualities of the Joseon era trial system, in terms of its differences from its Chinese counterpart as well as some similarities with it. First discussed here are various aspects of Joseon trials, and also the apparent nature of the trial system itself. Subsequently examined is the Weji-bu(外知部) entities, who served as trial experts and also representatives in court. The point raised in this article is that a years-old notion which had believed that Korean people in the past had a rather conservative mind-set which tried to avoid trials at all cost could not be farther from the truth and therefore is nothing but a misconception. In the Joseon period legal fights and lawsuits which intended to protect civil rights and properties took place rather frequently in local regions. We can see that from not only the trial system itself of the time but also various records including 『Minjang Chibu-chaek(民狀置簿冊)』, which was a compilation of civil appeals(訴狀) submitted to local prefects with the intention to launch lawsuits. This article strongly argues that such trend of actually ‘favoring lawsuits(好訟)' could be attributed to the open atmosphere of the Joseon society that did not see such actions as a vice at all, and also the Joseon system that allowed civilians to launch lawsuits relatively freely. Also examined here, alongside characteristics of the Joseon trial system, is the role that was played by the Weji-bu(外知部) entities, who were virtually ‘representatives in court.’ Examination of their actions shows us that the service of these entities had been required even since the early days of the dynasty. They involved themselves in the proceedings of the case, and represented the interests of their clients in the court. Some of them even served in the capacity of scriveners(代書人) or lawyers which we can see today, as they were well versed in legal codes and were also armed with necessary information usually involved in court actions. The Joseon government was not fond of their activities, as it was the government’s general view that these Weji-bu entities were inciting legal fights and were practicing law in an illegal fashion. They usually punished them heavily, even in the latter half of the dynasty. As a result, just like the Songsa(訟師: Lawsuit consultants) entities who operated during the Ming anc Qing periods, Weji-bu entitles had to go beyond legal boundaries and covertly operate. Although the modern adversarial system based upon lawyers’ service in court was only established after the Gabo-year reforms, it is clear that the Weji-bu tradition of Joseon served as a platform for such a new establishment of a modern legal system.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
  2. "經國大典", ~
  3. "大典後續錄", ~
  4. "續大典", ~
  5. "秋官志", ~
  6. "조선민정자료 목민편", ~
  7. "조선민정자료총서", ~
  8. "한국지방사자료총서", 여강출판사
  9. "推案及鞫案", ~
  10. "訓局謄錄", 장서각, ~
  11. "古文書集成 16-河回 豐山柳氏篇(Ⅱ)-", 한국정신문화연구원, ~
  12. "古文書7-官府文書", 서울대 규장각, ~
  13. "牧民心書", ~
  14. "欽欽新書", ~
  15. 김경숙, "15세기 정소(呈訴) 절차와 관찰사의 역할", 역사와 현실, (59), pp.69~99 (2006), 한국역사연구회
  16. 김경숙, "조선후기 山訟과 上言·擊錚 - 盧尙樞家와 朴春魯家의 소송을 중심으로 -", 古文書硏究, 33, pp.253~280 (2008), 한국고문서학회
  17. 김경숙, "조선후기 여성의 呈訴活動", 한국문화, (36), pp.89~123 (2005), 규장각한국학연구원
  18. 박병호, "한국법제사고" (1977), 법문사
  19. 박영철, "전제지배와 訟師의 향방 ― 宋代 르네상스 再考 ―", 동양사학연구, (123), pp.121~150 (2013), 동양사학회
  20. 심재우, "조선후기 소송을 통해 본 법과 사회", 동양사학연구, (123), pp.87~119 (2013), 동양사학회
  21. 심재우, "조선 후기 충청도 연기지역의 민장과 갈등 양상 1858년 『사송록(詞訟錄)』 분석을 중심으로", 정신문화연구, 37(1), pp.8~37 (2014), 한국학중앙연구원
  22. 오갑균, "조선시대 사법제도 연구" (1995), 삼영사
  23. 오금성, "명청시대 사회경제사" (2007), 이산
  24. 옥영정, "승총명록으로 보는 조선후기 향촌 지식인의 생활사" (2010), 한국학중앙연구원 출판부
  25. 임상혁, "소송 기피의 문화전통에 대한 재고와 한국사회", 법과사회, 25, pp.145~160 (2003), 법과사회이론학회
  26. 임상혁, "조선전기 민사소송과 소송이론의 전개", 박사, 민사소송법, pp.2000
  27. 전경목, "유서필지" (2006), 돌베개
  28. 전경목, "고문서, 조선의 역사를 말하다" (2013), 휴머니스트
  29. 전경목, "山訟을 통해서 본 조선후기 司法制度 운용실태와 그 특징", 법사학연구, 18 (1997)
  30. 전경목, "所志類의 뎨김에 나타나는 ‘告課’에 대해서-親審과 代理審을 구별하는 방법-", 고문서연구, 11 (1998)
  31. 전경목, "조선후기에 서당 학동들이 읽은 탄원서", 古文書硏究, 48, pp.257~286 (2016), 한국고문서학회
  32. 조윤선, "조선후기 소송연구" (2002), 국학자료원
  33. 한국고문서학회, "조선의 일상, 법정에 서다" (2013), 역사비평사
  34. 한상권, "朝鮮後期 社會와 訴冤制度-상언·격쟁 연구-" (1996), 일조각
  35. 한상권, "조선시대 소송과 외지부(外知部) ― 1560년 「경주부결송입안(慶州府決訟立案)」 분석 ―", 역사와 현실, (69), pp.255~292 (2008), 한국역사연구회
  36. 夫馬進, "中國近世の法制と社會" (1993), 京都大學人文科學硏究所

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)