본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

홍무 5년(1372) 명 태조의 고려에 대한 의심과 ‘힐난 성지’

Re-reading Zhu Yuanzhang’s “Speech of Denunciation” and the Relationship between Goryeo and Ming in 1372

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Zhu Yuanzhang 朱元璋, or Ming Taizu 明 太祖, gave a speech of denunciation to the Goryeo envoys sent by King Gongmin 恭愍王. This took place in the twelfth lunar month of the fifth year of the Hongwu 洪武 reign, or in mid-January 1373. The emperor exploded in rage, claiming that Goryeo killed his eunuch envoy he had sent earlier in the year. He also expressed his suspicions about Goryeo providing crucial military information to Naghachu, the famous Mongol warlord in Manchuria. Naghachu had in fact quite recently launched a surprise attack on the Ming troops stationed in the Liaodong peninsula in December 1372. In extreme anger, Zhu Yuanzhang went so far as to threaten a large-scale attack on Goryeo in the future. Historians have, up until now, interpreted this speech of denunciation as a significant turning point when the relationship between Ming and Goryeo suddenly soured and began deteriorating rapidly after having maintained a friendly relationship since the establishment of formal diplomatic relations in 1369. This paper presents an alternative interpretation to this conventional reading by re-reading and re-analyzing the imperial speech and paying close attention to the historical incidents from the spring of 1372. Our analysis shows that Zhu Yuanzhang began to suspect as early as the spring of that year that Goryeo was attempting military espionage activities in the Liaodong region. The emperor’s suspicions were strengthened by various incidents throughout the year. It must be noted that Zhe Yuanzhang was frustrated by a painful military setback against the Northern Yuan in the same year, and he seemed to realize that Goryeo should be seen as a competing force, rather than an ally when it came to the Ming advance to the Liaodong region. Goryeo was laying its own claim to the Mongol imperial legacy in the region at that time. As the military situation in the north turned unfavorable, the Ming emperor had sufficient reasons to be worried about Goryeo joining forces with Mongol. However, Zhu Yuanzhang could not simply sever the relationship with Goryeo in retaliation without any solid evidence to support his brewing suspicions. Therefore, Yuanzhang’s speech should be read as a precautious warning towards Goryeo, rather than an irreversible turning point in the breakdown of the diplomatic relationship that came later in 1375 after King Gongmin’s assassination in the autumn of 1374.

Abstract

Zhu Yuanzhang 朱元璋, or Ming Taizu 明 太祖, gave a speech of denunciation to the Goryeo envoys sent by King Gongmin 恭愍王. This took place in the twelfth lunar month of the fifth year of the Hongwu 洪武 reign, or in mid-January 1373. The emperor exploded in rage, claiming that Goryeo killed his eunuch envoy he had sent earlier in the year. He also expressed his suspicions about Goryeo providing crucial military information to Naghachu, the famous Mongol warlord in Manchuria. Naghachu had in fact quite recently launched a surprise attack on the Ming troops stationed in the Liaodong peninsula in December 1372. In extreme anger, Zhu Yuanzhang went so far as to threaten a large-scale attack on Goryeo in the future. Historians have, up until now, interpreted this speech of denunciation as a significant turning point when the relationship between Ming and Goryeo suddenly soured and began deteriorating rapidly after having maintained a friendly relationship since the establishment of formal diplomatic relations in 1369. This paper presents an alternative interpretation to this conventional reading by re-reading and re-analyzing the imperial speech and paying close attention to the historical incidents from the spring of 1372. Our analysis shows that Zhu Yuanzhang began to suspect as early as the spring of that year that Goryeo was attempting military espionage activities in the Liaodong region. The emperor’s suspicions were strengthened by various incidents throughout the year. It must be noted that Zhe Yuanzhang was frustrated by a painful military setback against the Northern Yuan in the same year, and he seemed to realize that Goryeo should be seen as a competing force, rather than an ally when it came to the Ming advance to the Liaodong region. Goryeo was laying its own claim to the Mongol imperial legacy in the region at that time. As the military situation in the north turned unfavorable, the Ming emperor had sufficient reasons to be worried about Goryeo joining forces with Mongol. However, Zhu Yuanzhang could not simply sever the relationship with Goryeo in retaliation without any solid evidence to support his brewing suspicions. Therefore, Yuanzhang’s speech should be read as a precautious warning towards Goryeo, rather than an irreversible turning point in the breakdown of the diplomatic relationship that came later in 1375 after King Gongmin’s assassination in the autumn of 1374.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. "高麗史", ~
  2. "明太祖實錄", ~
  3. "吏文", ~
  4. "遼東志", ~
  5. 高錫元, "麗末鮮初의 對明外交", 白山學報, 23 (1977)
  6. 구범진, "역주 이문 上" (2012), 세창출판사
  7. 김경록, "홍무연간(洪武年間) 명(明)의 요동경략(遼東經略)과 조․명(朝明)관계", 군사, (102), pp.187~226 (2017), 국방부군사편찬연구소
  8. 金成俊, "高麗와 元・明 關係", 한국사, 8 (1981), 국사편찬위원회
  9. 김순자, "韓國 中世 韓中關係史" (2007), 혜안
  10. 朴焞, "高麗末 東寧府征伐에 대하여", 中央史論, 4 (1985)
  11. 박영철, "잊혀진 使行路 黃海南路의 역사적 의의", 동양사학연구, (138), pp.1~61 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
  12. 박원호, "고려말 조선초 대명외교의 우여곡절", 한국사 시민강좌, 36 (2005)
  13. 오기승, "공민왕대 동녕부 전역(戰役) 고찰", 군사연구, (134), pp.293~329 (2012), 육군군사연구소[DOI]
  14. 윤은숙, "나가추의 활동과 14세기말 동아시아 政勢", 명청사연구, (28), pp.1~31 (2007), 명청사학회[DOI]
  15. 윤은숙, "北元과 明의 대립― 遼東 문제를 중심으로―", 동양사학연구, (105), pp.81~112 (2008), 동양사학회
  16. 윤은숙, "元末明初 劉益의 明朝 투항과 高麗의 對明 使行의 성격", 역사학보, (221), pp.325~354 (2014), 역사학회
  17. 이명미, "恭愍王代 후반 親明정책의 한 배경: 몽골 복속기 권력구조에 대한 트라우마", 사학연구, (113), pp.83~124 (2014), 한국사학회
  18. 全淳東, "14世紀 後半 明의 對高麗・朝鮮政策", 明淸史硏究, 5 (1996)
  19. 정동훈, "洪武帝의 명령이 고려에 전달되는 경로― 聖旨의 문서화 과정을 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (139), pp.219~255 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
  20. 정동훈, "초기 고려-명 관계에서 제주 문제", 한국중세사연구, (51), pp.241~275 (2017), 한국중세사학회
  21. 정동훈, "몽골제국의 붕괴와 고려-명의 유산 상속분쟁", 역사비평, (121), pp.77~98 (2017), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
  22. 정동훈, "明과 주변국의 外交關係 수립 절차의 재구성 ― 이른바 ‘明秩序’ 논의에 대한 비판을 겸하여 ―", 명청사연구, (51), pp.23~53 (2019), 명청사학회[DOI]
  23. 정동훈, "명초 외교제도의 성립과 그 기원 - 고려-몽골 관계의 유산과 그 전유(專有) -", 역사와 현실, (113), pp.343~380 (2019), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
  24. 정동훈, "고려 사신의 몽골 잠치(站赤) 이용", 사학연구, (134), pp.69~122 (2019), 한국사학회[DOI]
  25. 汪維輝, "《高麗史》和《李朝實錄》中的漢語研究資料", 漢語史學報, 9 (2010)
  26. 李新峰, "恭愍王後期明高麗關系與明蒙戰局", 韓國學論文集, 7 (1998), 新華出版社
  27. 張全眞, "朝鮮文獻中明初白話聖旨語言硏究", 言語文化硏究, 26(2) (2006)
  28. 陳學霖, "明太祖致高麗國王的白話聖旨", 明史硏究論叢, 8 (2010)
  29. 檀上寬, "東アジア海洋域圈の史的硏究" (2003), 京都女子大學
  30. 藤田明良, "「蘭秀山の亂」と東アジア海域世界―14世紀の舟山群島と高麗・日本―", 歷史學硏究, 698 (1997)
  31. 末松保和, "麗末鮮初における對明關係", 靑丘史草, 1 (1965)
  32. 池內宏, "滿鮮史硏究, 中世 第三冊" (1963), 吉川弘文館
  33. 和田淸, "東亞史硏究(滿洲篇)" (1955), 東洋文庫
  34. 和田淸, "東亞史硏究 (蒙古篇)" (1959), 東洋文庫

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)