본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선 호피・표피의 琉球國 贈與와 通交관계의 정립

A Study on Joseon’s Gift of Tiger and Leopard Skins to the Ryukyu Kingdom and Establishment of Friendly Relations

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In the late 14th century, the Ryukyu Kingdom emerged as a pivotal player of the East Asian triangular trade. It is no exaggeration to state that during the early modern era, the Ryukyu Kingdom served as a crucial link connecting the waters of East and Southeast Asia. Relations between the Ryukyu Kingdom and the Ming Dynasty initiated when Emperor Hongwu of the Ming Dynasty sent an official letter to King Qiao of Zhongshan in Ryukyu, requesting tribute. Subsequently, Ryukyu Kingdom took advantage of the Ming Dynasty's tributary system and maritime prohibition policy. In other words, they actively exploited the preferential policies of the Ming Dynasty and engaged in extensive trade with port cities in Southeast Asia using the sea ships they received from the Ming Dynasty. Furthermore, they forged a new maritime Silk Road by connecting Joseon and Japan. Ming goods were exported to various foreign countries, while foreign products were imported and sold within the Ming Dynasty, establishing a profitable trading system based on intermediation. This paper examines the Ryukyu Kingdom as an integral component of a broader study on East Eurasian states and societies, with a particular focus on the attributes of non-human commodities, notably tiger and leopard skins. Comprehending the relationship between Joseon and the Ryukyu Kingdom necessitates an examination of its political, economic, and diplomatic dimensions. However, if we move away from the institutional aspect and turn our attention to the goods, we may be able to identify the cultural nature of the contact between Joseon and the Ryukyu Kingdom from a new angle. While the King of Ryukyu Kingdom professed that both Joseon and his kingdom were vassals of the Ming Dynasty within the Ming's tributary system, the reality forced him to acknowledge substantial disparities in how the Ming Dynasty treated the two countries and the regulations that governed them. As a result, he aimed to establish a diplomatic framework that portrayed Joseon as Ryukyu’s older brother and Ryukyu as Joseon’s younger brother, all while preserving their communal relations. Meanwhile, Joseon, well aware of the Ryukyu Kingdom's stance, presented the Ryukyu King with gifts in the form of tiger skins and leopard skins, items laden with distinctive attributes signifying authority and status.

Abstract

In the late 14th century, the Ryukyu Kingdom emerged as a pivotal player of the East Asian triangular trade. It is no exaggeration to state that during the early modern era, the Ryukyu Kingdom served as a crucial link connecting the waters of East and Southeast Asia. Relations between the Ryukyu Kingdom and the Ming Dynasty initiated when Emperor Hongwu of the Ming Dynasty sent an official letter to King Qiao of Zhongshan in Ryukyu, requesting tribute. Subsequently, Ryukyu Kingdom took advantage of the Ming Dynasty's tributary system and maritime prohibition policy. In other words, they actively exploited the preferential policies of the Ming Dynasty and engaged in extensive trade with port cities in Southeast Asia using the sea ships they received from the Ming Dynasty. Furthermore, they forged a new maritime Silk Road by connecting Joseon and Japan. Ming goods were exported to various foreign countries, while foreign products were imported and sold within the Ming Dynasty, establishing a profitable trading system based on intermediation. This paper examines the Ryukyu Kingdom as an integral component of a broader study on East Eurasian states and societies, with a particular focus on the attributes of non-human commodities, notably tiger and leopard skins. Comprehending the relationship between Joseon and the Ryukyu Kingdom necessitates an examination of its political, economic, and diplomatic dimensions. However, if we move away from the institutional aspect and turn our attention to the goods, we may be able to identify the cultural nature of the contact between Joseon and the Ryukyu Kingdom from a new angle. While the King of Ryukyu Kingdom professed that both Joseon and his kingdom were vassals of the Ming Dynasty within the Ming's tributary system, the reality forced him to acknowledge substantial disparities in how the Ming Dynasty treated the two countries and the regulations that governed them. As a result, he aimed to establish a diplomatic framework that portrayed Joseon as Ryukyu’s older brother and Ryukyu as Joseon’s younger brother, all while preserving their communal relations. Meanwhile, Joseon, well aware of the Ryukyu Kingdom's stance, presented the Ryukyu King with gifts in the form of tiger skins and leopard skins, items laden with distinctive attributes signifying authority and status.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. "고려사절요", ~
  2. "태조실록", ~
  3. "세종실록", ~
  4. "문종실록", ~
  5. "단종실록", ~
  6. "세조실록", ~
  7. "성종실록", ~
  8. "연산군일기", ~
  9. "선조실록", ~
  10. "광해군일기", ~
  11. "명사", ~
  12. "明 神宗實錄", ~
  13. "만력 『대명회전』", ~
  14. "隋書", ~
  15. "역대보안", ~
  16. "沖繩縣志", ~
  17. "球陽", ~
  18. 손승철, "朝鮮·琉球關係史料集成" (1998), 국사편찬위원회
  19. 민덕기, "前近代 동아시아 세계의 韓·日 관계" (2007), 경인문화사
  20. 하우봉, "조선시대 해양국가와의 교류사" (2014), 경인문화사
  21. 하우봉, "조선과 유구" (1999), 도서출판 아르케
  22. 岡本弘道, "琉球王國海上交涉史硏究" (2010), 榕樹書林
  23. 梅木哲人, "新琉球国の歴史" (2013), 法政大学出版局
  24. 上里隆史, "海の王国·琉球 海域アジア大交易時代の実像" (2018), ボーダーインク
  25. 小島瓔禮, "万国津梁の鐘" (2000), 沖縄總合圖書
  26. 伊藤幸司, "中世の博多とアジア" (2021), 勉誠出版社
  27. 赤嶺守, "琉球王國" (2004), 講談社
  28. 竹之内一昭, "古代の皮革5, 日本の日用革製品", かわとはきもの, 157 (2011), 東京道立皮革技術センター
  29. 竹之内一昭, "近世アジアの皮革4. 日本の武具と馬具", かわとはきもの, 173 (2015), 東京道立皮革技術センター
  30. 竹之内一昭, "近世アジアの皮革6, 日本の皮革貿易", かわとはきもの, 175 (2016), 日本の皮革貿易, 東京道立皮革技術センター
  31. 中村栄孝, "日朝関係史の研究, 上" (1965), 吉川弘文館
  32. 知名定寬, "琉球沖繩佛敎史" (2021), 榕樹書林
  33. 김경록, "朝鮮時代 外交文書 咨文의 行移體系와 변화과정", 古文書硏究, 46, pp.23~55 (2015), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
  34. 서인범, "朝鮮 虎皮와 豹皮의 생산ㆍ유통", 명청사연구, (50), pp.1~52 (2018), 명청사학회[DOI]
  35. 서인범, "조선 호피·표피의 淸朝 진헌", 역사학보, (244), pp.195~244 (2019), 역사학회
  36. 서인범, "淸 勅使·通官에의 조선 호피 · 표피 사여와 무역", 동국사학, (69), pp.99~147 (2020), 동국역사문화연구소[DOI]
  37. 손승철, "阜村 申延澈敎授停年退任紀念 史學論叢" (1995), 일월서각
  38. 이원순, "歷代寶案을 통해서 본 朝鮮前期의 朝琉關係-直接通交期를 中心으로-", 국사관논총, 65 (1995)
  39. 정동훈, "명초 외교제도의 성립과 그 기원 - 고려-몽골 관계의 유산과 그 전유(專有) -", 역사와 현실, (113), pp.343~380 (2019), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
  40. 정성일, "『歷代寶案』으로 본 琉球의 朝鮮 認識", 동국사학, (62), pp.291~322 (2017), 동국역사문화연구소[DOI]
  41. 차혜원, "明朝와 琉球간 冊封 朝貢외교의 실체 -萬曆年間(1573-1620), 명조의 琉球정책을 중심으로-", 중국사연구, (54), pp.129~160 (2008), 중국사학회
  42. 하우봉, "朝鮮前期의 對琉球關係", 국사관논총, 59 (1994)
  43. 関周一, "唐物の流通と消費", 國立歷史民俗博物館硏究報告, 92 (2002)
  44. 宮城榮昌, "沖縄の歴史" (1968), NHKブックス
  45. 金城正篤, "頒封論·領封論", 第3回琉球·中国交渉史に関するシンポジウム論文集 (1996), 沖縄縣圖書館史料編集室
  46. 楠瀬慶太, "虎皮考 : 日本古代·中世における虎皮の流通と消費に関する一考察", 比較社会文化研究, 25 (2009)
  47. 北川香子, "17世紀初頭カンボジア-日本往復書簡について-", 東南アジア-歴史と文化-, 44 (2015)
  48. 上原兼善, "沖縄県史 各論編 第3卷 古琉球" (2010), 沖縄県教育委員会
  49. 西里喜行, "明淸交替期の中琉日關係に關する一考察ー尙賢·尙質·尙貞の冊封問題とその周邊ー", 第8回琉球·中国交渉史に関するシンポジウム論文集 (2007)
  50. 新里惠二, "沖縄県の歴史" (1972), 山川出版社
  51. 長正統, "中世日鮮關係における巨酋使の成立", 朝鮮學報, 41 (1966)
  52. 佐伯弘次, "15世紀後半の博多貿易商人道安と朝鮮·琉球", 전북사학회, 29 (2006)
  53. 佐藤厚, "15世紀朝鮮が琉球に送った仏典―世祖の刊経事業との関連―", 専修人文論集, 98 (2016)
  54. 中島楽章, "永楽年間の日明朝貢貿易", 史淵, 140 (2003)
  55. 荒木和憲, "古琉球期王權論-支配理念と「周緣」諸島", 国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, 226 (2021)
  56. "歷代の王統"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)