명부 통용어와 부사화
Noun-Adverb Multicategory Words and Adverbialization
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the contemporary dictionary and school grammar, noun-adverb multicategory words is formmally recognized and is classified to noun or adverb by the combined particle. But, this mechanical analysis causes lots of confusion. Among the presented examples of ‘noun+particle’ construction, ‘noun+delimeter’ constructions are actually included considerably. More strict judgement basis is required to determine the part of speech of noun adverb multicategory words. When a multicategory word combines with advebial particle or conjunctive particle, it can be classified to noun. On the other hand, when it combines wih delimeter including ‘i/ka’, ‘ul/lul’, it is better to be recognized as adverb. In case that it combines with copular or modifies noun in front of noun, it is also better to be recognized as adverb. When noun magnifies its function, it can be used as adverb. Combined wiith adverbial particle, noun has the character of adverb, which is called the adverbialization of the first step of noun. Adverbial of ‘noun+lo, ey’ construction is concreted to adverb by the absense of particle, which is called the adverbialization of the second step of noun.
Abstract
In the contemporary dictionary and school grammar, noun-adverb multicategory words is formmally recognized and is classified to noun or adverb by the combined particle. But, this mechanical analysis causes lots of confusion. Among the presented examples of ‘noun+particle’ construction, ‘noun+delimeter’ constructions are actually included considerably. More strict judgement basis is required to determine the part of speech of noun adverb multicategory words. When a multicategory word combines with advebial particle or conjunctive particle, it can be classified to noun. On the other hand, when it combines wih delimeter including ‘i/ka’, ‘ul/lul’, it is better to be recognized as adverb. In case that it combines with copular or modifies noun in front of noun, it is also better to be recognized as adverb. When noun magnifies its function, it can be used as adverb. Combined wiith adverbial particle, noun has the character of adverb, which is called the adverbialization of the first step of noun. Adverbial of ‘noun+lo, ey’ construction is concreted to adverb by the absense of particle, which is called the adverbialization of the second step of noun.
참고문헌 (27)
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (2008), 국립국어원 누리집
- 김경훈, "현대국어 부사어 연구", 박사, pp.1996
- 김슬옹, "이른바 ‘품사통용어’의 사전 기술 연구: 품사론의 재검토를 위하여", 사전편찬학 연구, 4(1), pp.104~169 (1992)
- 김영선, "한국어 전자 사전의 부사 목록 구축과 문제점", 언어과학, 11(2), pp.39~61 (2004)
- 남기심, "표준 국어 문법론" (1985), 탑출판사
- 배주채, "물론’의 품사와 구문", 국어학, 42, pp.53~81 (2003)
- 서정수, "한국어의 부사" (2005), 서울대학교출판부
- 서태룡, "국어 품사 통용은 이제 그만(이병근 선생 퇴임 기념 국어학논총)", pp.359~389 (2006), 태학사
- 신지연, "국어 품사론의 몇 가지 문제에 대하여", 목원어문학, 17, pp.27~40 (1999)
- 안주호, "한국어 명사의 문법화 현상 연구" (1997), 한국문화사
- 이규호, "노걸대류 출발점 표시의 조사들", 중국학연구, 36, pp.75~94 (2006)
- 이규호, "복합조사 ‘이라고’의 생성과 분화", 국어학, 47, pp.145~177 (2006)
- 이규호, "접속조사의 분류와 목록", 우리말글, 37, pp.171~195 (2006)
- 이규호, "문법 형태와 문법 표현", 한국언어문학, 60, pp.53~82 (2007)
- 이규호, "한국어 복합조사", 한국학술정보 (2007)
- 이규호, "체언 수식 부사: 부사 관형 구성 연구", 국어학, 51, pp.3~28 (2008)
- 이병규, "명사,” 왜 다시 품사론인가", pp.6~27 (2006), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
- 이익섭, "한국어 문법" (2005), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이홍식, "사전에서의 품사 정보 처리에 대하여(이병근 선생 퇴임 기념 국어학논총)", pp.771~795 (2006), 태학사
- 임유종, "한국어 부사 연구" (1999), 한국문화사
- 조민정, "부사, 왜 다시 품사론인가", pp.228~267 (2006), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음문화사
- 홍재성, "한국어의 명사 Ⅰ", 새국어생활, 11(3), pp.129~144 (2001)
- 홍재성, "한국어의 명사 Ⅱ", 새국어생활, 11(4), pp.119~131 (2001)