본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국전쟁기 유진오의 글쓰기와 피난의 윤리성

Writings of Yoo Jin-oh and Justification of Taking Refuge during the Korean War

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Yoo Jin-oh, one of the writers of Dogangpa during the Korean War, chose to emphasize the legitimacy of taking refuge as a subject matter. In contrast to a fellow writer Mo Yoon-sook who described heroic characters regarding refuge, Yoo Jin-oh described weak intellectuals and reinforced the justification of taking refuge. Instead of an internal factor, he looked for an external factor of choosing refuge. He defined refuge not as an escape but as a shelter for a better future. Here lies the most significant meaning of his works, that is, to discover a way to achieve both life and morality. One of the important events that took place at the outbreak of Korean War was evacuation, which was not an act for survival; it was an event that changed the topographical map of Korean society's ideologies. While those literary figures who failed to evacuate(the remaining party) did writing as a means of relieving their guilty conscience and justification for treachery, those who succeeded in evacuation(Dogangpa) used their writing to show they were thoroughly anti-communist.

Abstract

Yoo Jin-oh, one of the writers of Dogangpa during the Korean War, chose to emphasize the legitimacy of taking refuge as a subject matter. In contrast to a fellow writer Mo Yoon-sook who described heroic characters regarding refuge, Yoo Jin-oh described weak intellectuals and reinforced the justification of taking refuge. Instead of an internal factor, he looked for an external factor of choosing refuge. He defined refuge not as an escape but as a shelter for a better future. Here lies the most significant meaning of his works, that is, to discover a way to achieve both life and morality. One of the important events that took place at the outbreak of Korean War was evacuation, which was not an act for survival; it was an event that changed the topographical map of Korean society's ideologies. While those literary figures who failed to evacuate(the remaining party) did writing as a means of relieving their guilty conscience and justification for treachery, those who succeeded in evacuation(Dogangpa) used their writing to show they were thoroughly anti-communist.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. "문예, 현대공론, 전선문학, 신천지, 서울신문", ~
  2. 전시문학독본, "계몽사" (1951)
  3. 유진오, "고난의 90일" (1950), 수도문화사
  4. 유진오, "구름 위의 만상" (1966), 일조각
  5. 강준만, "한국현대사산책 1권" (2009), 인물과사상사
  6. 고길섶, "스물한 통의 역사진정서" (2005), 앨피
  7. 고은, "1950년대" (1973), 민음사
  8. 공임순, "스캔들과 반공국가주의" (2010), 앨피
  9. 권영민, "한국현대문학사" (1994), 민음사
  10. 김동춘, "분단과 한국사회" (1997), 역사비평사
  11. 박원순, "전쟁부역자 5만여명 어떻게 처리되었나", 역사비평, 통권 : 11, pp.172~198 (1990), 역사비평사
  12. 서동수, "모윤숙의 피난 체험과 도강파의 글쓰기", 한국문예비평연구, (33), pp.365~390 (2010), 한국현대문예비평학회
  13. 서경석, "전후문단의 재편과정과 의의, 한국전후문학의 형성과 전개", pp.11~23 (1993), 태학사
  14. 서중석, "한국현대민족운동연구 2" (1996), 역사비평사
  15. 신영덕, "전쟁과 소설" (2007), 역락
  16. 정해구, "분단과 이승만:1945~1948", 역사비평, 통권 : 34, pp.252~288 (1996)
  17. 조남현, "현대소설의 해부" (1994), 문예출판사
  18. 조연현, "내가 살아온 한국문단" (1968), 현대문학사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)