러시아어 수동태 조격 행위주의 통사적 파생
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper addresses the question of how to derive the Russian instrumental case marked passive agents in the Minimalist syntactic framework. In the history of the Russian language, morphological realization of passive agents have developed from P(reposition)-type, i.e., otъ plus genitive case marked noun, to the I(nstrumental)-type. Arguing that such a change in case marking corresponds to the change in syntactic status, namely, adjunct to argument-adjunct, the present paper draws another construction with passive-like semantics, i.e., the so-called adversity impersonal construction. Drawing upon the similarities in semantics and case usage, it is proposed that agent phrases in passive and causer phrases in adversity impersonals are the same in structure. Capitalizing much upon the abovementioned diachronic and synchronic facts and the recent advances in theory, especially, Ch. Collins’ smuggling approach, the pro- posed syntactic derivation of the passive sentences imparts a crucial role of inversing to an auxiliary-like verb be (byt’), which is merged in the head of vP. It is further argued that an argument-adjunct-generating PredP contains PRO, whereas an adjunct PP does not. The current proposal can neatly account for the word order facts, diachronic developments and the undeniable presence of an agent in passive.
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of how to derive the Russian instrumental case marked passive agents in the Minimalist syntactic framework. In the history of the Russian language, morphological realization of passive agents have developed from P(reposition)-type, i.e., otъ plus genitive case marked noun, to the I(nstrumental)-type. Arguing that such a change in case marking corresponds to the change in syntactic status, namely, adjunct to argument-adjunct, the present paper draws another construction with passive-like semantics, i.e., the so-called adversity impersonal construction. Drawing upon the similarities in semantics and case usage, it is proposed that agent phrases in passive and causer phrases in adversity impersonals are the same in structure. Capitalizing much upon the abovementioned diachronic and synchronic facts and the recent advances in theory, especially, Ch. Collins’ smuggling approach, the pro- posed syntactic derivation of the passive sentences imparts a crucial role of inversing to an auxiliary-like verb be (byt’), which is merged in the head of vP. It is further argued that an argument-adjunct-generating PredP contains PRO, whereas an adjunct PP does not. The current proposal can neatly account for the word order facts, diachronic developments and the undeniable presence of an agent in passive.
참고문헌 (28)
- 권경준, "사건 피동구문으로서의 러시아어 역경 비인칭 구문", 슬라브학보, 26(4), pp.1~25 (2011), 한국슬라브학회
- Babby, L., "A theta-theoretic analysis of adversity impersonal sentences in Russian", Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The MIT meeting, 1993 (1994)
- Bauerová, M., "Bespredložnyj tvoritel’nyj padež v staroslavjanskom jazyke, In Sintaksis russkogo tvoritel’nogo. Strukturno- sravnitel’noe issledovanie", pp.287~311 (1964), Státni pedagogické nakladatelstvi
- Borkovskij, V. I., "Sintaksis drevnerusskix gramot" (1949), Nauka
- Bräuer, H., "Der persönliche Agens beim Passive im Altbulgarischen" (1952)
- Collins, Ch, "A Smuggling Approach to the passive in English", Syntax, 8(2), pp.81~120 (2005)
- den Dikken, M., "Relators and Linkers, In The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas" (2006), MIT Press
- Dowty, D, "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Gehrke, B., "How to become passive", 석사, pp.2009
- Grković-Major, J., "The role of syntactic transitivity in the development of Slavic syntactic structures", Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 74, pp.63~74 (2009)
- Grimshaw, J., "Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events, In Knowledge and Language, Vol. 2, Lexical and conceptual structure", pp.143~155 (1993), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Hallmann, P, "Predication and movement in passive", Lingua, 125, pp.76~94 (2013)
- Jaeggli, O, "Passive", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.587~633 (1986)
- Jung, H., "The Syntax of Be-possessive: Parametric Variation and Surface Diversities" (2011), John Benjamins
- Kratzer, A, "Building statives", 석사, pp.2000
- Krys’ko, V.B., "Istoričeskij sintaksis russkogo jazyka, In Ob’’ekt i perexodnost’" (1997), Azbukovnik
- Kwon, K., "The adversity impersonal construction in diachrony", Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Second Cornell Meeting 2009, pp.255~269 (2010)
- Kwon, K., "Improvised causativization", Studia Linguistica, 67(3)
- Landau, I, "Movement out of control", Linguistic Inquiry, 34(3), pp.471~498 (2003)
- Popova, Z. D., "Upotreblenie padežej, In Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka. Sintaksis. Prostoe predloženie", pp.345~402 (1978), Nauka
- Pylkkänen, L, "Introducing Arguments" (2008), MIT Press
- Seržant, I., "The so-called possessive perfect in North Russian and the Circum-Baltic area. A diachronic and areal account", Lingua, 122, pp.356~385
- Sæbø, K. J., "The mystery of the missing agent: Reconstructing passives", Paper read at Wuppertaler Linguistisches Kolloquium (2005)
- Storoshenko, D. R, "Rethinking the passive by phrase in English", Proceedings of the 2011 Western Conference on Linguistics (2011)
- Wiemer, B., "The evolution of passives as grammatical constructions in Northern Slavic and Baltic languages, In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components", pp.271~331 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
- Xodova, K.I., "Tvoritel’nyj padež v stradatel’nyx konstrukcijax i bezličnyx predloženijax, In Tvoritel’nyj padež v slavjanskix jazykax", pp.127~158 (1958), Izd-vo Akademii Nauk SSSR
- Zaliznjak, A. A, "О jazykovoj situacii v drevnem Novgorode", Russian linguistics, 11(2-3), pp.115~132 (1987)
- Zaliznjak, A. A., "Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt" (2004), Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury