본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

HAVE/BE 매개변수의 결과로서의 능격성: 북부 러시아어 be-완료구문을 중심으로

Ergativity in North Russian as a Consequence of the HAVE/BE parameter

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

This paper argues that ergativity may appear in such a language as North Russian that has not been considered as ergative, via a be-possessive perfect structure. I set diagnostic factors of ergativity and demonstrate that the morphosyntactic and semantic features of the North Russian be-perfect construction meet these factors: The agentive external argument appears in an oblique case form in a position lower than the matrix Tense, which allows the object to potentially appear in the nominative. The oblique argument assumes subject properties, which is characteristic of morphologically-ergative constructions. Given that ergative patterns correlate with the possessive perfect formation with the be-auxiliary in many languages, I pursue a detailed underlying structure of the North Russian construction, based on the syntactic parallel between possessive and perfect constructions. The proposed underlying structure of the be-possessive and be-perfect constructions provides an adequate environment for ergative encoding by containing a prepositional complementizer that assigns an oblique case to the embedded subject. The object case-marking variation between NOM and ACC, and the agreement variation on the copula are accounted for as a consequence of nominalization of the participle. The ergative encoding in the North Russian perfect shows that the Tense/Aspect-split ergativity is a corollary of the cross-linguistic variation of the possessive be and have, a universal lexical parameter independently attested outside of studies of ergativity.

Abstract

This paper argues that ergativity may appear in such a language as North Russian that has not been considered as ergative, via a be-possessive perfect structure. I set diagnostic factors of ergativity and demonstrate that the morphosyntactic and semantic features of the North Russian be-perfect construction meet these factors: The agentive external argument appears in an oblique case form in a position lower than the matrix Tense, which allows the object to potentially appear in the nominative. The oblique argument assumes subject properties, which is characteristic of morphologically-ergative constructions. Given that ergative patterns correlate with the possessive perfect formation with the be-auxiliary in many languages, I pursue a detailed underlying structure of the North Russian construction, based on the syntactic parallel between possessive and perfect constructions. The proposed underlying structure of the be-possessive and be-perfect constructions provides an adequate environment for ergative encoding by containing a prepositional complementizer that assigns an oblique case to the embedded subject. The object case-marking variation between NOM and ACC, and the agreement variation on the copula are accounted for as a consequence of nominalization of the participle. The ergative encoding in the North Russian perfect shows that the Tense/Aspect-split ergativity is a corollary of the cross-linguistic variation of the possessive be and have, a universal lexical parameter independently attested outside of studies of ergativity.

참고문헌 (69)

  1. Agranat, T. E, "About Two Types of Passive Constructions in the Votic Languages", Talk at the symposium "The Typology of Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations," Kazan State Univ (2004)
  2. Alexiadou,Artemis, "Functional Structure in Nominals" (2001), John Benjamins
  3. Anand, Pranav, "The Locus of Ergative Case Assignment: Evidence from Scope, Ergativity" (2006), Springer
  4. Andersen,Henning, "Markedness and the Theory of Linguistic Change", pp.21~57 (2001), John Benjamins
  5. Anderson,Stephen, "On the Notion of Subject in Ergative Languages", pp.1~23 (1976), Academic Press
  6. Be Alternation in Basque, "The Have", pp.2004, Arregi, Karlos
  7. Babby,Leonard, "Existential Sentences and Negationin Russian" (1980), Karoma
  8. Baker,Mark, "Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
  9. Baker,Mark, "The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar" (2001), Basic Books
  10. Baker, "Passive Arguments Raised", Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2), pp.219~251 (1989)
  11. Belletti, Adriana, "Inversion as Focalization, In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar", pp.69~90 (2001), Oxford University Press
  12. Belletti, Adriana, "Aspect of the Low IP Area, In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2", pp.16~51 (2004), Oxford University Press
  13. Benveniste, Emile, "La Construction Passive du Parfait Transitif, Bulletin de la Socie?te? de Linguistique de Paris 48", pp.52~62 (1952)
  14. Bhatt, Rakesh, "On Experiencers and Subjects of Perfect Predicates", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 24(1), pp.73~84 (1994)
  15. Bobaljik, Jonathan, "Ergativity and Ergative Unergatives", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 19, pp.45~88 (1993), Colin Phillips
  16. Borer,Hagit, "Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages", Studies in Generative Grammar, 13 (1984), Foris
  17. Borschev, Vladimir, "The Russian Genitive of Negation in Existential Sentences: The Role of Theme-Rheme Structure Reconsidered", Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague (novelle serie), 4, pp.185~250 (2002)
  18. Bybee, Joan, "The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems", Studies in Language, 13, pp.51~103 (1989)
  19. Bybee, "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), University of Chicago Press
  20. Chomsky,Noam, "Noam(1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Studies in Generative Grammar, Vol. 9", Foris, ~ (1981)
  21. Chomsky,Noam, "A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory, The View from Building 20", pp.167~176 (1993), MIT Press
  22. Chomsky,Noam, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  23. Dahl,?ten, "Tense and Aspect Systems" (1985), Blackwell
  24. Danylenko,Andrii, "Slavica et Islamica-Ukrainian in Context" (2006), Verlag Otto Sagner
  25. Deal, Amy R, "Ergative Case and the Transitive Subject: A View from Nez Perce" (2007), University of Massachusetts at Amherst
  26. Dixon,Robert, "The Dyirbal language of North Queensland", Cambridge University Press, ~ (1972)
  27. Dixon,Robert, "Ergativity", Cambridge University Press, ~ (1994)
  28. Etxepare, Ricardo, "Number Long Distance Agreement in (Substandard) Basque", International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, pp.303~350 (2005)
  29. Freeze,Ray, "Existentials and Other Locatives", Language, 68(3), pp.553~595 (1992)
  30. Fukui,Naoki, "Deriving the Differences between English and Japanese: A Case Study in Parametric Syntax", English Linguistics, 5, pp.249~270 (1988)
  31. Greenberg, Joseph H, "Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Element, Universals of Grammar", pp.73~113 (1963), MIT Press
  32. Harves, Stephanie, "Unaccusative Syntax in Russian", 박사, pp.2002
  33. Heine,Bernd, "Possession" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  34. Hiraiwa,Ken, "Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture", 박사, pp.2005
  35. Holisky, Dee Ann, "The Case of the Intransitive Subject in Tsova-Tush (Batsbi), Lingua 71", 103~132 (1987)
  36. Isa?enko,A.V, "On 'Have' and 'Be' Languages", Slavic Forum: Essays in Linguistics and Literature, pp.43~77 (1974), Mouton
  37. Jakobson, Roman, "Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums, Selected Writing II", Mouton, 3~15 (1932)
  38. Johns, Alana, "Deriving Ergativity, Linguistic Inquiry 27", 57~87 (1992)
  39. Jung,Hakyung, "The Grammar of Have in a Have-less Language: Possession, Perfect, and Ergativity in North Russian", 박사, pp.2008
  40. Kayne, Richard, "Toward a Modular Theory of Auxiliary Selection", Studia Linguistica, 47, pp.3~31 (1993)
  41. Keenan, Edward, "Predicate Formation Rules in Universal Grammar, Proceedings of the WCCFL 4", Stanford University, 123~138
  42. Kondrashova, Natalia, "The Syntax of Existential Quantification", 박사, pp.1996
  43. Kuz'mina, I. B, "Sintaksis pric?astnix form v russkix govorax" (1971), Nauka
  44. Lavine, James, "Topics in the Syntax of Nonagreeing Predicates in Slavic", 박사, pp.2000
  45. Legate,Julie, "Split Absolutive, Ergativity: Emerging Issues", Kluwer, 143~171 (2006)
  46. Legate,Julie, "Morphological and Abstract Case", Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), pp.55~101 (2008)
  47. Levin, Beth, "Surface Ergativity: Case", theta Relations Reexamined, Proceedings of the NELS 15, 1985, pp.286~301
  48. Mahajan,Anoop, "Universal Grammar and the Typology of Ergative Languages, Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation", John Benjamins, 35~57 (1997)
  49. Marantz,Alec, "Case and Licensing, Proceedings of the Eighth ESCOL '91", CLC Publications, 234~253 (1991)
  50. Matveenko, V. I, "Nekotorye osobennosti struktury stradatel’no- bezli?nogo oborota v russkix govorax", 103~139 (1961)
  51. Mohanan,Tara, "Argument Structure in Hindi.Stanford" (1994), CSLI Publications
  52. Moro,Andrea, "The Raising of Predicates" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  53. Murasugi,Kumiko, "Crossing and Nested Paths: NP Movement in Accusative and Ergative Languages", 박사, pp.1992
  54. Nedjalkov, Vladimir, "The Typology of Resultative Constructions, Typology of Resultative Constructions", John Benjamins, 3~64 (1988)
  55. Nunes,Jairo, "Another Look at Lithuanian Impersonal Passives", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 24(1), pp.347~360 (1994)
  56. Orr,Robert, "An Embryonic Ergative Construction in Irish", General Linguistics, 24, pp.38~45 (1984)
  57. Pesetsky, David, "Paths and Categories", 박사, pp.1982
  58. Pylkka?nen,Liina, "Causation and External Arguments", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 35, pp.161~183 (1999)
  59. Rivero, Maria-Luisa, "Russian Anticausitives with Oblique Subjects, Proceedings of FASL 13", Michigan Slavic Publications, 276~288 (2005)
  60. Salanova, Andre?s, "Nominalization and Aspect", pp.2007
  61. Salvi,Giampaolo, "Syntactic Restructuring in the Evolution of Romance Auxiliaries, Historical Development of Auxiliaries", Mouton de Gruyter, 225~236 (1987)
  62. Schu?tze,Carson, "On the Nature of Default Case", Syntax, 4(3), pp.205~238 (2001)
  63. Timberlake,Alan, "Subject Properties in the North Russian Passive, Subject and Topic", Academic Press, 547~570 (1976)
  64. Trask,Larry, "On the Origin of Ergativity, Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations", Academic Press, 385~404 (1979)
  65. Trubetzkoy, "Die phonologischen Systeme", Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague, 4, pp.96~116 (1931), Jednota ?eskoslovenskych Matematik? a Fysik?
  66. Tsedryk,Egor, "The Split Verb as a Source of Morphological Ergativity, Ergativity: Emerging Issues", Springer, 337~363 (2006)
  67. Ura, Hiroyuki, "Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar" (2000), Oxford University Press
  68. Vincent,Nigel, "The Development of the Auxiliaries Habere and Esse in Romance, Studies in the Romance Verb", Croom Helm, 71~96 (1982)
  69. Yip, Moira, "Case in Tiers", Language, 63, pp.217~250 (1987)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)