본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『삼국사기』 소재 서독류(書牘類) 일고찰

A study on Seodok works(書牘類) in Samguksagi(『三國史記』)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is founding the literary characters of 「Dapseolinguiseo(答薛仁貴書)」, 「Giseotaijowal(寄書太祖曰)」, 「Taijodapwal(太祖答曰)」. Letter in Samguk periods is a diplomatic document but is literary works because of the alluding to a historical event and metaphorical expressions. 「Dapseolinguiseo(答薛仁貴書)」 written by Kangsoo(强首) is not literary letter because of practical letter. 「Giseotaijowal(寄書太祖曰)」written by Choiseungwoo(崔承祐) is literary letter because of fresh rhetoric and the alluding to a historical event. 「Taijodapwal(太祖答曰)」written by Choieonwi(崔彦撝) is also literary letter because of fresh rhetoric and the alluding to a historical event. Giving a specific example, two works show consistently a tactical error, solving matters with reason, compared with war potential of he and I, driving strong & soft strategy, conquest but no battle, Heaven helps and God assists in content and plot, and reappear battle scene, fresh expression, propery rhetoris, strong style, the effective alluding to a historical event in expression. Conclusionary 「Giseotaijowal(寄書太祖曰)」 & 「Taijodapwal(太祖答曰)」 is a literary written appeals equal to Kyeongwangsoseo(檄黃巢書) written by Choichiweon(崔致遠). The study of another literary style in Samguksagi(『三國史記』) & Samgukyusa(『三國遺事』) is remained thesis.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is founding the literary characters of 「Dapseolinguiseo(答薛仁貴書)」, 「Giseotaijowal(寄書太祖曰)」, 「Taijodapwal(太祖答曰)」. Letter in Samguk periods is a diplomatic document but is literary works because of the alluding to a historical event and metaphorical expressions. 「Dapseolinguiseo(答薛仁貴書)」 written by Kangsoo(强首) is not literary letter because of practical letter. 「Giseotaijowal(寄書太祖曰)」written by Choiseungwoo(崔承祐) is literary letter because of fresh rhetoric and the alluding to a historical event. 「Taijodapwal(太祖答曰)」written by Choieonwi(崔彦撝) is also literary letter because of fresh rhetoric and the alluding to a historical event. Giving a specific example, two works show consistently a tactical error, solving matters with reason, compared with war potential of he and I, driving strong & soft strategy, conquest but no battle, Heaven helps and God assists in content and plot, and reappear battle scene, fresh expression, propery rhetoris, strong style, the effective alluding to a historical event in expression. Conclusionary 「Giseotaijowal(寄書太祖曰)」 & 「Taijodapwal(太祖答曰)」 is a literary written appeals equal to Kyeongwangsoseo(檄黃巢書) written by Choichiweon(崔致遠). The study of another literary style in Samguksagi(『三國史記』) & Samgukyusa(『三國遺事』) is remained thesis.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김부식, "삼국사기" (1978), 동서문화사
  2. "삼국사기 CD 96, 한글과 컴퓨터", ~
  3. 서거정, "東文選", ~
  4. 서사증, "文體明辨", ~
  5. 소통, "文選", ~
  6. 오눌, "文章辨體", ~
  7. 요내, "古文辭類纂", ~
  8. 유협, "文心雕龍", ~
  9. 문선규, "한국한문학사" (1977), 정음사
  10. 안대회, "한국고문의 이론과 전개" (1997), 태학사
  11. 양태종, "문화상호수사학을 위한 격서 분석", 독일어문학, 13(4), pp.265~287 (2005), 한국독일어문학회
  12. 이가원, "한문신강" (1980), 신구문화사
  13. 이가원, "조선문학사" (1994), 태학사
  14. 이강래, "삼국사기전거론" (1995), 민족사
  15. 이경선, "동문선" (1970), 현암사
  16. 이구의, "최고운의 삶과 문학" (1995), 국학자료원
  17. 졸고, "삼국시대 한문학 연구" (2004), 대구대출판부
  18. 이동환, "동문선의 선문방향과 그 의미 in: 한국고전심포지움 2" (1985), 일조각
  19. 이병주, "한국한문학사" (1991), 반도출판사
  20. 이종건, "한국한문학개론" (1991), 보진재
  21. 이종찬, "한문학개설" (1989), 이우출판사
  22. 조동일, "한국문학통사 1" (2005), 지식산업사
  23. 진필상, "한문문체론" (2001), 이회출판사
  24. 최신호, "한문강화" (1977), 현암사
  25. 허흥식, "동문선의 편찬동기와 사료가치 in: 한국고전심포지움 2" (1985), 일조각

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)