본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

三國遺事 鄕歌記述文의 詩話的 照明

A Study on the Sihwa of the Samgukyusa Hyang-Ga Prose

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Abstract

This paper concerns all Hyang-Ga Prose from the viewpoint of the Sihwa. The structure of the Hyang-Ga Prose is same as Sihwa. This is not a coincidence because Il-yeon applied the style of Sihwa to the Hyang-Ga Prose. The Sihwa book was diffused widely during the period of Goryeo and Il-yeon knew it well. Il-yeon believed that the value of the Hyang-Ga is same as a Chinese poem. So he wrote the book convinced that Hyang-Ga must have the Sihwa. Most writers of the Hyang-Ga are not seen in history books. Most of their names are similar to the content of the story. This was originated from naming characters intentionally by the author to recognize the necessity of the Sihwa structure and show the subject of the writing effectively. Many Praise Forms are the result of intentional choice, valuating highly the power to impress people. The purpose of the Hyang-Ga is mostly to accomplish wishes and praise excellent people. The criticism was used almost in Praise Form. The secret of the Buddhism was combined with the power to impress people of the Hyang-Ga, so it was mainly used to solve and achieve the difficult wishes or events. Il-yeon thought that Hyang-Ga had the power to impress the gods, so he wrote the Hyang-Ga Prose. As a result, contents of the Hyang-Ga Prose are full of special material, the skill of the sentences have artificialities, and the work selection was consistent with Praise Form and Admiration Form. The value of the Hyang-Ga Prose is that it recorded the Hyang-Ga, has much information about the history of Hyang-Ga, roles, values, authors, explanations, forms, currencies, and pointing errors. Il-yeon, I'm afraid, reflects his consciousness too much and focused on the Praise Form and Admiration Form when he selected the works. So it does not present clear understanding of the contents and details of the Hyang-Ga.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. "韓國歌謠의 硏究" (1961), 을유문화사
  2. "삼국유사의 시가와 서사문학 연구" (1995), 태학사
  3. "鄕歌解讀法硏究" (1995), 서울대 출판부
  4. "新羅佛敎文學硏究" (1976), 현암사
  5. "鄕歌文學硏究" (1976), 삼우사
  6. "新羅歌謠의 硏究" (1982), 열화당
  7. "삼국유사향가연구" (1997), 태학사
  8. "新羅詩歌의 硏究" (1982), 형설출판사
  9. "삼국유사의 서술방식 연구" (2005), 제이앤씨
  10. "삼국유사의 종합적 연구" (2002), 박이정
  11. "삼국유사의 종합적 검토" (1987), 한국정신문화연구원
  12. "향가문학의 이론과 해석" (2001), 일지사
  13. "小華詩評硏究」", 1993
  14. "崔行歸의 鄕歌論 考察", 38, pp.145~158 (1997)
  15. "韓國의 詩歌詩話", 7, pp.73~87 (2005), 東方詩話學會
  16. "鄕歌의 呪詞的 性格", pp.40~47 (1993)
  17. "鄕歌의 文學的 硏究", pp.12~39 (1993)
  18. "三國遺事 소재 詩歌와 敍事文脈 연구방법론", pp.86~118 (1998)
  19. "鄕歌의 作者와 그 周邊問題", pp.151~165 (1993)
  20. "鄕歌歌謠 作者의 機能類型", pp.140~150 (1993)
  21. "鄕歌의 創作發想에 대하여 삼국유사와 문예적 가치 해명", pp.3~27 (1982)
  22. "鄕歌의 作者 향가문학연구", pp.148~158 (1993)
  23. "鄕歌의 本質 향가문학연구", pp.81~103 (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)