본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아어 간접화법에 대하여: 직접화법과 자유간접화법과의 비교를 중심으로

On indirect speech in Russian: its comparison with direct speech and Free indirect discourse

김정일
한국러시아문학회 (The Korean Association Of Rusists)|2006.06|러시아어문학연구논집 (Russian Language and Literature)|제22호|pp. 143-174

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

analysis분석직접화법간접화법관점화법point of view자유간접화법free indirect discoursereported speechdeictic centerdirect speechindirect speechsequence of tense직시중심시제의 일치
주제분류러시아어와문학

초록

Abstract

The study investigates the features of indirect speech, direct speech and free indirect discourse and their relationship. Previous studies explain that they have same origin and their distinct structures are the result of transformation. But their distinct structures do not mean the clear-cut boundary among them. Direct speech has in common with indirect speech in that it conveys not only the content of original speech but also speaker's various attitudes toward the original speech. Indirect speech may give information directly to hearer to help him to understand the situation. This is the reason why Voloshnov "the analysis" is the essence of the indirect speech. Free indirect discourse is a linguistic device for dramatic effect by controlling the distance between the text and the reader. In this sense it is closely connected with indirect speech. At the same time, free indirect discourse has common with direct speech in that both have two deictic centers, and aim at dramatic effect. Unlike direct speech and indirect speech, free indirect discourse are more text dependent, and can be detected only by careful hearers (or readers). As mentioned above, formal differences in these forms of the reported speech shows they have their own distinct functional scopes. That Reported speech is the product of double procedures explains why these seemingly similar forms of reported speech operate on the different levels. Unlike other human behavior, while conveying other's original speech which was already encoded by original speakers, another encoding procedures begins. Thus in reported speech, various speakers, contents, attitudes are involved, and different functional scopes of the forms of reported speech reflect the interaction among these various elements.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "소사 вот에 대하여", 2 (2006), 충북대학교
  2. "현대 러시아어에서의 접속사 А와 НО 그 의미적, 화용적 기능의 변별성", 12(2) (2002)
  3. "시점의 시학" (1998), 좋은날
  4. "러시아어학 보다 현실적 접근을 찾아서" (1997), 서울대 출판부
  5. "국어의 인용구문 연구" (1993), 탑출판사
  6. "소설의 시학" (1996), 문학과 지성사
  7. "Показатели чужой речи де, дескать, мол. К проблеме интерпрета ции речеповеденских актов" (2000)
  8. "Типовые механизмы искажения смысла при передаче чужой речи", pp.14~30 (1998), Наследие
  9. "Современный русский язык Теория языковых единиц" (2001)
  10. "Русский язык: энциклопедия" (1997)
  11. "Семантические исследования" (1996), Языки русской культуры
  12. "Егоцентрическая семантика союзов А и Но" (1997), Москва
  13. "Русский язык энтиклопедия" (1997), Дрофа
  14. "Семиотика искусства" (1995), Языки славянской культуры
  15. "The encyclopedia of language and linguistics Vol 7" (1994), Pergamon Press
  16. "The problem of speech genres University of Texas", 1986 (1952), ~
  17. "Narration and representation in the language of Fictioin" (1982)
  18. "Shifting points of orientation in Modern Russian Tense selection in reported perception" (1996), John Benjamins
  19. "The quote and beyond defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian", 36, pp.1071~1118 (2004)
  20. "Tense in the Novel An Investigation of Some Potentialities of Linguistic Criticism" (1970)
  21. "Reanimated voices speech reporting in a historical-pragmatic perspective" (2000)
  22. "“Tense in Indirect Speech in Russian", 39, pp.~496
  23. "Deixis and information packaging in Russian discourse" (1998), John Benjamins
  24. "The thread of discourse" (1975)
  25. "Reported speech in South Slavic", pp.57~74 (1996), John Benjamins
  26. "The Philosophy of Grammar" (1924)
  27. "Cohesion in English" (1976)
  28. "Verbal Worlds Between Action and Vision A Theory of the Modes of Poetic Discourse"
  29. "Чужая речь в устнойкоммуникации", pp.223~232 (1998), Наследие
  30. "A Survey of Recent Accounts", pp.249~287 (1978)
  31. "Speech in the English Novel" (1973)
  32. "“The syntax and semantics of quotation A Festschrift for Morris Halle" (1973)
  33. "Free indirect speech and its functioning in the nineteenth-century European nove" (1977)
  34. "The Semantics of direct and indirect discourse Papers in Linguistics 7", pp.267~307
  35. "On Sentence Coordination in Russian Papers from the 17th Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society", pp.431~438
  36. "Shifters and Non-Verbal Categories of Russian New Vistas in Grammar" (1991), John Benjamins Publishing Company

관련 논문AI추천

러시아어에서 발화의 재현과 화법이기웅러시아연구소 · 러시아연구2006 · 제16권 제2호간접화행과 러시아어 구조-요청화행을 중심으로이남경한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2006 · 제22호러시아어의 문법적 관용표현 연구임수영한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2004 · 제15호‘ли’를 포함한 러시아어 통사적 관용구에 대하여박혜옥한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2006 · 제21호현대러시아어의 대조화제와 ‘화제성’송은지러시아연구소 · 러시아연구2007 · 제17권 제2호러시아어 “충고” 표현 구문에 대하여강성희한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2007 · 제24호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

체호프의 ‘진창’에 나타난 신화적 언어의 상징 구조심민자pp. 9-43플라토노프의 1920년대 소설 시학: 『체벤구르』의 경우윤영순pp. 45-69소설언어의 가치적 일원성과 다원성이강은pp. 71-95러시아 입체미래파 예술운동 속에서 시와 미술의 상호성-‘지각의 지연’으로 본 시적 기원이대우pp. 97-118몽상가의 ‘경계’ 넘기: 도스또옙스끼의 『여주인』(хозяйка) 연구조혜경pp. 119-142
원문 보기