도스토옙스키와 뭉크의 대화적 상상력
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article is focused on the mutual dialogue taken place between literature and art. The story of meeting and dialogue between literature and art has been a continuously interesting topic for many researchers for a long time. However, a full-scale research, especially on intertextuality between Dostoevsky, a Russian writer, and Edvard Munch, a Norwegian artist, has not yet conducted up to now. Dostoevsky was the most important writer to Edvard Munch throughout his entire life. Dostoevsky’s novels worked as the lingual texts that enriched the artistic imagination of Munch. Even at the very moment of his death, Munch was reading a Dostoevsky’s novel. Damaged in childhood by appalling family tragedies, Dostoevsky and Edvard Munch were obsessed by sickness, insanity and death. Munch found the Russian-Norwegian congeniality and tried to express characters’ actions and their inner world embodied in the dramatic situation in Dostoevsky’s works. If Dostoevsky is the one who scrutinized the deeper regions of the human soul, Munch is the one who pursued “Soul Paintings” which revealed the universality of souls. Munch successfully recreated main themes in Dostoevsky’s literature and images of characters into his paintings, a.k.a. icon signs. In a word, Munch was the artist who creatively understood Dostoevsky’s language and grammar. He reproduced his world of empathy with Dostoevsky into the world of silence. As Leonardo da Vinci studied human anatomy and dissected the body, these two artists analyzed the soul. This article includes the pieces of Munch: The Scream, Despair, Jealousy, Anxiety, Madonna, Vampire, Death and the Maiden, Evening on Karl Johan Street, Night in St. Cloud, Hans Jaeger, and the works of Dostoevsky: Notes from Underground, Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, The Devils, The Brothers Karamazovs. It concludes that Munch created the new artistic world through dialogic imagination with Dostoevsky.
Abstract
This article is focused on the mutual dialogue taken place between literature and art. The story of meeting and dialogue between literature and art has been a continuously interesting topic for many researchers for a long time. However, a full-scale research, especially on intertextuality between Dostoevsky, a Russian writer, and Edvard Munch, a Norwegian artist, has not yet conducted up to now. Dostoevsky was the most important writer to Edvard Munch throughout his entire life. Dostoevsky’s novels worked as the lingual texts that enriched the artistic imagination of Munch. Even at the very moment of his death, Munch was reading a Dostoevsky’s novel. Damaged in childhood by appalling family tragedies, Dostoevsky and Edvard Munch were obsessed by sickness, insanity and death. Munch found the Russian-Norwegian congeniality and tried to express characters’ actions and their inner world embodied in the dramatic situation in Dostoevsky’s works. If Dostoevsky is the one who scrutinized the deeper regions of the human soul, Munch is the one who pursued “Soul Paintings” which revealed the universality of souls. Munch successfully recreated main themes in Dostoevsky’s literature and images of characters into his paintings, a.k.a. icon signs. In a word, Munch was the artist who creatively understood Dostoevsky’s language and grammar. He reproduced his world of empathy with Dostoevsky into the world of silence. As Leonardo da Vinci studied human anatomy and dissected the body, these two artists analyzed the soul. This article includes the pieces of Munch: The Scream, Despair, Jealousy, Anxiety, Madonna, Vampire, Death and the Maiden, Evening on Karl Johan Street, Night in St. Cloud, Hans Jaeger, and the works of Dostoevsky: Notes from Underground, Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, The Devils, The Brothers Karamazovs. It concludes that Munch created the new artistic world through dialogic imagination with Dostoevsky.
참고문헌 (28)
- 데이비드 버스, "위험한 열정 질투" (2006), 추수밭
- 도스또예프스끼, "죄와 벌(상하)" (2000), 열린책들
- 도스또예프스끼, "분신, 가난한 사람들" (2002), 열린책들
- 도스또예프스끼, "백치(상하)" (2007), 열린책들
- 도스토예프스키, "카라마조프가의 형제들(1,2,3)" (2007), 민음사
- 롤프 스테너센, "에드바르드 뭉크" (2003), 눈빛
- 모니카 봄 두첸, "세계 명화의 비밀" (2009), 생각의 나무
- 미셀 파스투로, "색의 비밀" (2003), 미술문화
- 수 프리도, "에드바르 뭉크: 세기말 영혼의 초상" (2008), 을유문화사
- 에르빈 파노프스키, "도상해석학 연구: 르네상스 미술에서의 인문주의적 주제들" (2009), 시공아트
- 오종우, "신은 우리 곁에 있는가" (2011), 예술행동
- 요세프 파울 호딘, "절망에서 피어난 매혹의 화가 에드바르 뭉크" (2010), 시공 아트
- 울리히 비쇼프, "에드바르드 뭉크(1863~1944)" (2005), 마로니에 북스
- 윤호병, "한국 현대시로 전이된 에드바르트 뭉크의 그림세계―이승하 시 畵家 뭉크와 함께와 한영옥 시 뭉크로부터 2를 중심으로", 비교문학, 29, pp.149~172 (2002), 한국비교문학회
- 이병훈, "Dostoevsky: 아름다움이 세상을 구원할 것이다" (2012), 문학동네
- 조용훈, "에로스와 타나토스" (2005), 살림
- 조유선, "도스또예프스끼 읽기 사전" (2002), 열린책들
- 조주관, "죄와 벌의 현대적 해석" (2009), 연세대학교 출판부
- 진중권, "춤추는 죽음" (2005), 세종서적
- 헨리 레마크, "비교문학, 그 정의와 기능, In 비교문학" (1980), 중앙출판
- 홍대화, "도스또예프스기: 읽기의 즐거움" (2005), 살림
- Julia Kristeva, "Desire in Language: Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art"
- Lachmann, Renate, "Memory and Literature: Intertexuality in Russian Modernism" (1997), University of Minnesota Press
- Jacques Catteau, "Dostoevsky and the Process of Literary Creation" (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Robert Louis Jackson, "Dialogues with Dostoevsky: the Overwhelming Questions" (1993), Stanford University
- Kenneth Lantz, "The Dostoevsky Encyclopedia" (2004), Greenwood Press
- Leatherbarrow, W. J., "The Cambridge Companion to Dostoev- skii" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Diane Oenning Thompson, "The Brothers Karamazov and the Poetics of Memory" (1991), Cambridge University Press
