본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

도스토옙스키와 시각 시각 학습과 윤리의 문제

Dostoevsky and Visuality: on Learning to See and Visual Ethics

석영중
한국러시아문학회 (The Korean Association Of Rusists)|2019.05|러시아어문학연구논집 (Russian Language and Literature)|제65호|pp. 63-84|DOI 10.24066/russia.2019..65.003

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Ethics윤리DostoevskySeeing도스토옙스키Visuality바라보기. 시각시각 학습Learning to see
주제분류러시아어와문학

초록

Visual cognition is the key to understanding Dostoevsky. In his texts, seeing is always intertwined with knowing. As he insisted in numerous critical essays, the most significant human organ for an artist is the eye, and the most crucial barometer for a genuine artwork is the proper act of seeing. The proper act of seeing for him has nothing to do with verisimilitude or photographic accuracy. Mimesis, whether a visual, or psychological, or linguistic, cannot be a goal of perception. What is important is how to see a human being as a human being with human eyes. Seeing can be an act of domination and exploitation. In order to see a fellow human being as a human being, we have to learn to make seeing an act of compassion. In short, for Dostoevsky seeing is not only a cognitive act, but an ethical act.

Abstract

Visual cognition is the key to understanding Dostoevsky. In his texts, seeing is always intertwined with knowing. As he insisted in numerous critical essays, the most significant human organ for an artist is the eye, and the most crucial barometer for a genuine artwork is the proper act of seeing. The proper act of seeing for him has nothing to do with verisimilitude or photographic accuracy. Mimesis, whether a visual, or psychological, or linguistic, cannot be a goal of perception. What is important is how to see a human being as a human being with human eyes. Seeing can be an act of domination and exploitation. In order to see a fellow human being as a human being, we have to learn to make seeing an act of compassion. In short, for Dostoevsky seeing is not only a cognitive act, but an ethical act.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 리멜레, 마리우스, "보는 눈의 여덟 가지 얼굴" (2015), 글항아리
  2. 박찬웅, "본다는 것. 시각생리" (2009), 의학서원
  3. 색스, 올리버, "마음의 눈" (2013), 알마
  4. 석영중, "도스토예프스키와 렉시오 디비나: 듣기와 보기에 관한 고찰", 러시아어문학연구논집, (57), pp.97~116 (2017), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
  5. 석영중, "도스토예프스키와 신경미학:『백치』에 나타난 시각의 문제를 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (53), pp.65~92 (2016), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
  6. Вдовин А., "Иллюзия правдоподобия: новые исследования реализма", Russian Literature, 95, pp.123~132 (2018)
  7. Достоевский Ф., "Полное собрание сочинений в 30 томах" (1990), Наука
  8. Новикова Е., "Живописный экфрасис в романе Ф. М. Достоевского «Идиот»", Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология, 25, pp.87~97 (2013)
  9. Anastasiu I., "Visual and Audible in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy's Work", Cogito, 3, pp.67~72 (2011)
  10. Barsht K., "Russian Literature, Modernism, and Visual Arts", pp.23~58 (2000), Cambridge Univ. Press
  11. Baumann C, "Did Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky suffer from mesial temporal lobe epilepsy?", Seizure, 14, pp.324~330 (2005)
  12. Catteau J., "Dostoyevsky and the Process of Literary Creation" (1989), Cambridge Univ. Press
  13. Epstein T., "Seeing and Believing in Dostoevsky's The Idiot", Figura, 19, pp.109~121 (2008)
  14. Frank J., "Dostoevsky The Stir of Liberation" (1988), Princeton Univ. Press
  15. Fung P., "Dostoevsky and the Epileptic Mode of Being" (2015), Legenda
  16. Gatrall J., "The Icon in the Picture: Reframing the Question of Dostoevsky's Modernist Iconography", The Slavic and East European Journal, 48, pp.1~25 (2004)
  17. Hahn C, "Visuality Before and Beyond the Renaissance: Seeing as Others Saw", pp.169~196 (2000), Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. Hudspith S., "Dostoevskii and the Slavophile Aesthetic", Dostoevsky Studies, 4, pp.177~197 (2000)
  19. Iniesta, I, "Epilepsy in the Process of Artistic Creation of Dostoevsky", Neurologia, 29, pp.371~378 (2014)
  20. Jackson R., "The Art of Dostoevsky: Deliriums and Nocturnes" (1981), Princeton Univ. Press
  21. Jackson R., "Dialogues with Dostoevsky" (1993), Stanford Univ. Press
  22. Johnson B., "Intersecting Nervous Disorders in Dostoevsky’s The Insulted and the Injured", Dostoevsky Studies, 16, pp.73~98 (2012)
  23. Johnson L., "The Face of the Other in Idiot", Slavic Review, 50, pp.867~878 (1991)
  24. Kantor, V., "Confession and Theodicy in Dostoevsky’s Oeuvre (The Reception of St. Augustine)", Russian Studies in Philosophy, 50, pp.10~23 (2011)
  25. Kosslyn S., "Image and Brain: the Resolution of the Imagery Debate" (1994), MIT Press
  26. Miles, M., "Vision: The Eye of the Body and the Eye of the Mind in St. Sugustine’s ‘Detrinitate’ and ‘Confessions’", The Journal of Religion, 63, pp.125~142 (1983)
  27. Miller R, "Dostoevsky's Unfinished Journey" (2007), Yale Univ. Press
  28. Mole C., "Vision and Abstraction: An Empirical Refutation of Nico Orlandi's Non-cognitivism", Philosophical Psychology, 29, pp.365~373 (2016)
  29. Ossorgin M., "Visual Polyphony: The Role of Vision in Dostoevsky’s Poetics" (2017), Columbia Univ
  30. Rice, J, "Dostoevsky’s Medical History: Diagnosis and Dialectic", The Russian Review, 42, pp.131~161 (1983)
  31. Siddiqi B., "Existentialism, Epiphany, and Polyphony in Dostoevsky’s Post-Siberian Novels", Religions, 10, pp.1~15 (2019)
  32. Toumayan A., "“I More than the Others”: Dostoevsky and Levinas", Yale French Studies, 104, pp.55~66 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

도스토예프스키와 신경미학:『백치』에 나타난 시각의 문제를 중심으로석영중한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2016 · 제53호도스토옙스키와 이콘: 죽음의 집의 기록에 나타난 바라봄의 문제를 중심으로석영중한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2022 · 제78호도스토예프스키와 렉시오 디비나: 듣기와 보기에 관한 고찰석영중한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2017 · 제57호도스토옙스키의 작품에 나타난 관상학조주관한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2012 · 제41호『백치』에 나타난 시각과 기억의 문제 연구조혜경한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2016 · 제54호도스또예프스끼 창작에 나타난 미 인식의 문제―정교미학과연관하여―허선화한국문학과종교학회 · 문학과 종교2006 · 제11권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

호모 노마드로서 고골의 삶과 열망 -단편 「로마」를 중심으로-박미정pp. 7-29А.갈리치-К.이사예프의 희극 『타이미르에서 전화 왔습니다』의 희극적 구조와 수용백용식pp. 31-61시간의 형상: 이오시프 브로드스키의 「나비」와 폐허의 시이지연pp. 85-108공감의 두 양상: 『백치』와 『부활』을 중심으로조혜경pp. 109-128Язык молодёжи как языковая субкультура в современном русском языке (на примере прозы И. Денежкиной)백경희pp. 129-150
원문 보기