러시아 구어체 담화에서청자의 반응과 화용적 기능: 통사적 관용구를 중심으로
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the problems of the hearer's responses and its pragmatical functions in colloquial russian text. The meaning of lingual communication is to attract the mutual understanding and agreement between interlocutors. Therefore, the hearer's responses are very important to avoid discontinuance of the conversation and misunderstanding of speaker's intention. In the hear's responses are reflected the second speaker's subjective appraisal of the proposition (the proposition-centered aspect) and in addition, agreement/disagreement utterance with the speaker' viewpoint (the relation-centered aspect). In colloquial russian the modal utterances of the subjective appraisal are too various to systematize, because they are not indicated or indirectly represented in the statements. Thus, the agreement/support statements of the second speaker are needed to elaborate on the context, because the proposition is not clearly represented. In colloquial speech it is often omitted by lingual economical efficiency. For example, Волнуешься? - То есть!; Вы обрадовались этому письму? - Ещё бы! я его так ждал．In the other case the hearer's modal utterances represent disagreement/contradiction evaluation of the proposition. For instance, Он вас расстроил?－Ещё чего! Буду я из－за него расстраиваться! In the interrogative sentence with inversion of word order operates the function of rhetoric mechanism. Sometimes, the meaning of statement is wholly dependent on the context. It is so prominent in colloquial speech that needed to inquire the word order and intonation construction(ИК-5,ИК-7). Ex) Ты похудел. Вернемся，отец тебя извинит． - Очень мне нужно его извинение. So, clearly not indicated or indirectly represented statements of speaker's reponses as indirect speech must be diversly investigated in pragmatical aspect. In each cultural context exist the particular lingual phenomenons, which are explained by cultural inter-textuality. So, in this research are given classification of usages of the hearer's modal utterances, especially agreement/disagreement evaluation of the proposition and analysis on the lingual tendency and tastes of contemporary russian colloquial context.
Abstract
This study examines the problems of the hearer's responses and its pragmatical functions in colloquial russian text. The meaning of lingual communication is to attract the mutual understanding and agreement between interlocutors. Therefore, the hearer's responses are very important to avoid discontinuance of the conversation and misunderstanding of speaker's intention. In the hear's responses are reflected the second speaker's subjective appraisal of the proposition (the proposition-centered aspect) and in addition, agreement/disagreement utterance with the speaker' viewpoint (the relation-centered aspect). In colloquial russian the modal utterances of the subjective appraisal are too various to systematize, because they are not indicated or indirectly represented in the statements. Thus, the agreement/support statements of the second speaker are needed to elaborate on the context, because the proposition is not clearly represented. In colloquial speech it is often omitted by lingual economical efficiency. For example, Волнуешься? - То есть!; Вы обрадовались этому письму? - Ещё бы! я его так ждал．In the other case the hearer's modal utterances represent disagreement/contradiction evaluation of the proposition. For instance, Он вас расстроил?－Ещё чего! Буду я из－за него расстраиваться! In the interrogative sentence with inversion of word order operates the function of rhetoric mechanism. Sometimes, the meaning of statement is wholly dependent on the context. It is so prominent in colloquial speech that needed to inquire the word order and intonation construction(ИК-5,ИК-7). Ex) Ты похудел. Вернемся，отец тебя извинит． - Очень мне нужно его извинение. So, clearly not indicated or indirectly represented statements of speaker's reponses as indirect speech must be diversly investigated in pragmatical aspect. In each cultural context exist the particular lingual phenomenons, which are explained by cultural inter-textuality. So, in this research are given classification of usages of the hearer's modal utterances, especially agreement/disagreement evaluation of the proposition and analysis on the lingual tendency and tastes of contemporary russian colloquial context.
참고문헌 (22)
- 박혜옥, "러시아어 관용구의 정의 - 통사적 관용구 중심", 어문학 연구논집, (17) (2004), 상명대 어문학 연구소
- 박혜옥, "‘ли’를 포함한 러시아어 통사적 관용구에 대하여", 러시아어문학연구논집, 19(21), pp.357~382 (2006), 한국러시아문학회
- 오주영, "화용론과 의미해석" (1998), 경성대학교 출판부
- 이향천, "양상의 언어 철학적 고찰", 언어학, (56), pp.119~157 (2010), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 이성범, "추론의 화용론" (2001), 한국문화사
- 정희자, "담화와 문법" (1998), 부산외국어대학교 출판부
- "Futher Notes on Logic and Convention, In Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics", pp.113~128, Academic Press
- Lyons, J., "Semantics. Vols. I & II" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Searl, J. R, "Speech Acts" (1969), Cambridge University Press
- Арутюнова Н．Д．, "Типы языковых значений：Оценка，Событие，Факт" (1976), Наука
- Бондарко А．В．, "Теория значения в системе функциональной грамматики" (2002)
- Брызгунова Е．А．, "Эмоционально－стилистические различия русской звуковой речи" (1984)
- Величко А．В．, "Синтаксическая фразеология для русских и иностранцев" (1996)
- Величко А．В．., "Книга о грамматике" (2009)
- Володина Г. И, "А как об этом сказать? Специфические обороты разговорной речи" (2005)
- Всеволодова. М. В., "Синтаксическая идиоматика русского языка в лингвопрагматическом аспекте" (2000)
- Крылова О. А, "Коммуникативный синтаксис русского языка" (1992)
- Падучева Е. В., "Высказывание и его соотнесенность с действительностью" (1985)
- Падучева Е. В., "Прагматические аспекты связности диалога, In Статьи разных лет" (2009)
- Шведова Н. Ю, "Очерки по синтксису русской разговорной речи" (2003)
- Шмелев Д．Н．, "Синтаксическая членимость высказывания в современном русском языке" (1976)