Письмо-памфлет в контексте «писем вождю»: на материале русской литературы XX века
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The article deals with the history of the Russian Literature and the Censorship of the Soviet period. We come out with the assumption that in the history of Russian literature the genre «Letters to Master» in two variants – «Letter to Tsar» and «Letter to Chief». In article one of subvarieties of the genre (letter-lampoon) is considered. We come to the conclusion that the letter-lampoon existed only during the Soviet era, that is in existence «Letters to Chief». The texts written by A.T.Averchenko to V.I.Lenin (two letters), by V.V.Mayakovsky to A.V.Lunacharsky (two letters), by V.N.Voynovich to L.I.Brezhnev (one letter) belong to this subvariety of the genre. Our research showed that letters-lampoons to tsars wasn’t written. Probably, the reason of it was that Tsar was perceived as the God’s anointed sovereign, and irrespective of political addictions and the relation to the identity of the specific governor of the writers addressing with letters to tsars, frankly it was not accepted to deride the power.
Abstract
The article deals with the history of the Russian Literature and the Censorship of the Soviet period. We come out with the assumption that in the history of Russian literature the genre «Letters to Master» in two variants – «Letter to Tsar» and «Letter to Chief». In article one of subvarieties of the genre (letter-lampoon) is considered. We come to the conclusion that the letter-lampoon existed only during the Soviet era, that is in existence «Letters to Chief». The texts written by A.T.Averchenko to V.I.Lenin (two letters), by V.V.Mayakovsky to A.V.Lunacharsky (two letters), by V.N.Voynovich to L.I.Brezhnev (one letter) belong to this subvariety of the genre. Our research showed that letters-lampoons to tsars wasn’t written. Probably, the reason of it was that Tsar was perceived as the God’s anointed sovereign, and irrespective of political addictions and the relation to the identity of the specific governor of the writers addressing with letters to tsars, frankly it was not accepted to deride the power.
참고문헌 (12)
- Аверченко А.Т., "Моя симпатия и сочувствие Ленину", Столица, (1), pp.20~ (1990)
- Аверченко А.Т., "Приятельское письмо Ленину", Столица, (1), pp.21~ (1990)
- Войнович В.Н., "Открытое письмо Л.И.Брежневу", Книжное обозрение, (1), pp.8~ (1989)
- Войнович В.Н., "Я все эти годы жил надеждой…", Юность, (10), pp.82~ (1988)
- Ленин В.И., "Полное собрание сочинений, Том 44", pp.249~250 (1984)
- Маяковский В.В., "Полное собрание сочинений в 13 томах. Том 12", pp.17~20 (1959)
- Маяковский В.В., "Открытое письмо народному комиссару по просвещению тов. Луначарскому, Маяковский В.В. Полное собрание сочинений в 13 томах. Том 12", pp.14~15 (1959)
- Паперно М.В., "Об изучении поэтики письма, Труды по метрике и поэтике. Учёные записки Тартуского государственного университета. Выпуск 420", Учёные записки Тартуского государственного университета. Выпуск 420. Тарту, 105~111 (1977)
- Спиридонова Л., "Новые люди глазами юмориста", Вопросы литературы, (3), pp.224~236 (1991)
- Суровцева Е.В, "«Письмо вождю» в русле мировой и русской эпистолярной традиции", Болгарская русистика, (3-4), pp.58~74 (2007)
- Тодд У.М., "Дружеское письмо как литературный жанр в пушкинскую эпоху" (1994)
- Todd W.M., "The familiar letter as a literary genre in the age of Pushkin" (1976), Princeton