언어에 대한 사회적 성찰이 언어 발전에 미친 영향 연구 : 19세기 초반 러시아의 언어논쟁을 중심으로
A Study on the Effects of Social Reflection on the Development of Language : Focused on the Linguistic Debate in Russia in the Early 19th Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
18th and 19th centuries in Russia were the period of intensive social reflection on language. Its climax was the linguistic debate in the early 19th century. It seems that the preceding context of this debate was a particularity of the Russian language situation in the 18th century. The long-standing correlation between Church Slavonic and Russian resulted in cracks, and there was a complex dynamic relationship between loanwords and Slavonism. The linguistic debate that arose in this context was a collective concern about the direction Russian language should move forward, based on the shared perceptions of the crisis of Russian. Many writers, thinkers, philosophers and others of the time participated in the debate and discussed various linguistic issues, ranging from the question of whether Russian and Church Slavonic are one language or another, to the evaluation of loanwords and Slavonism, and furthermore, to the diagnosis and solution of problems in Russian. Such a collective discourse on linguistic issues has had a significant impact on changes and evolution of Russian. As the Karamzin's camp and Shishkov's camp clashed and mutually influenced through linguistic debate, they left deep traces in Russian literary language, such as the influx of spoken language and loanwords into literary language, the activation of the secular usage of religious terms, and the expansion of Slavonism.
Abstract
18th and 19th centuries in Russia were the period of intensive social reflection on language. Its climax was the linguistic debate in the early 19th century. It seems that the preceding context of this debate was a particularity of the Russian language situation in the 18th century. The long-standing correlation between Church Slavonic and Russian resulted in cracks, and there was a complex dynamic relationship between loanwords and Slavonism. The linguistic debate that arose in this context was a collective concern about the direction Russian language should move forward, based on the shared perceptions of the crisis of Russian. Many writers, thinkers, philosophers and others of the time participated in the debate and discussed various linguistic issues, ranging from the question of whether Russian and Church Slavonic are one language or another, to the evaluation of loanwords and Slavonism, and furthermore, to the diagnosis and solution of problems in Russian. Such a collective discourse on linguistic issues has had a significant impact on changes and evolution of Russian. As the Karamzin's camp and Shishkov's camp clashed and mutually influenced through linguistic debate, they left deep traces in Russian literary language, such as the influx of spoken language and loanwords into literary language, the activation of the secular usage of religious terms, and the expansion of Slavonism.
참고문헌 (26)
- Виноградов В.В, "Очерки по истории русского литературного языкаXVII—XIX вв" (1938), Государственноеучебно-педагогическое издательство
- Винокур Г.О., "Русский язык. Исторический очерк" (2006), URSS
- Вяземский П.А., "Полное собрание сочинений. Т.8" (1883), изд. гр. С.Д. Шереметева
- Глинка С.Н., "Нравственное объяснение некоторых слов и речений", Русский вестник, 8, pp.91~103 (1811)
- Греч Н.И., "Чтения о русском языке" (1840), в типографии Н. Греча
- Григорьева Т.М., "Три века русской орфографии (XVIII-XX вв.)" (2004), Элпис
- Живов В.М., "Язык и культура в России XVIII века" (1996), Школа«Языки русской культуры»
- Карамзин Н.М., "Сочинения. Т.3" (1848), Изд. А. Смирдина
- Карамзин Н.М, "Избранные сочинения. Т.1" (1964), Художественнаялитература
- Ломоносов М.В., "Российская грамматика", Тип. Имп. Акад. наук
- Лотман Ю.М., "История и типология русскойкультуры", pp.446~538 (2002), Искусство—СПБ
- Макаров П.И, "Сочинения и переводы. Т.1" (1817), ВУниверситетской типографии
- Макаров П.И., "Московский Меркурий. Ч.4" (1803), Нояб
- Панов М.В, "История русского литературного произношенияXVIII-XX вв" (2002), Едиториал УРСС
- Пекарский П.П., "Наука и литература в России при Петре Великом. Т.2" (1862), Товарищества «Общественная польза»
- Проскурнин Н.П., "К 250-летию гражданского книгопечатания вРоссии", XVIII век, 4, pp.376~384 (1959)
- "Этимологический словарь русского языка" (2003)[URL]
- Станевич Е.И., "Рассуждение о русском языке. Ч.2" (1808), типография Ивана Глазунова
- Толстой Н.И., "Избранныетруды. Т.2", pp.464~482 (1998), Языки русской культуры
- Тредиаковский B.K., "Сочинения. Т.1-3" (1849), Изд. А. Смирдина
- Тредиаковский B.K., ". Ч.1", ПриИмператорской Академии наук
- Успенский Б.А, "Краткий очерк истории русского литературногоязыка (XI-XIX вв.)" (1994), Гнозис
- Шанский Н.М., "Школьный этимологический словарьрусского языка. Происхождение слов" (2002), Дрофа
- Шицгал А.Г., "Русский типографский шрифт: Вопросы истории ипрактика применения" (1974), Книга
- Шишков А.С., "Собрание сочинений и переводов адмиралаШишкова" (1825), Тип. Имп. рос. акад
- Шишков А.С., "Записки, мнения и переписка адмирала А.С. Шишкова. Т.2" (1870), B. Behr's Buchhandlung