본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

≪金瓶梅≫의 과도 Neg/Aux 後置현상: ‘S+把O+Neg/AuxV’ 구문을 중심으로

A study on phenomena of the excessive post-posing of negative and auxiliary verbs in Jinpingmei: ‘S+把O+Neg/AuxV’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper mainly focused on post-posing of negative and auxiliary verbs of ba (把) Construction in Jinpingmei (金瓶梅), based on a large amounts of the typical errors of Korean students. But the Academy of Languages in China cannot have any satisfactory interpretation on these phenomena until now and just had formed a hasty conclusion, that is an idiomatic expression or the exceptional language phenomena. Therefore, this essay will shed new lights on some distinctions of the Chinese language by reverse angle, errors of Korean students. For the first time, it claims that the historical Chinese documents, in particular, preposing of negative and auxiliary verbs of Romance of the Three Kingdoms (三國演義) securing their legitimacy for Sinocentrism. The same is true of Journey to the West (西遊記) in the 16th century during the Ming dynasty and Water Margin (水滸傳) written in vernacular Chinese rather than Classical Chinese. However, The Story of the Stone (紅樓夢: Dream of the Red Chamber) created by descendant of Booi Aha (Manchu word, meaning high official (Chinese: 包衣大臣), holds a majority of post-posing of negative and auxiliary verbs. The Plum in the Golden Vase or The Golden Lotus (金瓶梅) of unknown authorship was written by Shandong dialect. It holds a dominant majority of post-posing of negative and auxiliary verbs. It was definitely derived from post-posing mechanism of the common grammar in Altaic language. Because Historical and linguistic interchange between the Shandong dialect and the Liaodong Peninsula lead to language contact and change, the use of inter-language are alarmingly frequent during the Ming dynasty. This sounds more natural. So, Banner man that reigned Liaodong will certainly have been used inter-language (中介語, 過渡語, 語際語, Altaic Chinese (阿式漢語), a mistaken Chinese (漢語偏誤), too. Upside down a mistaken Chinese used by banner man would have influenced on the Shandong dialect.

Abstract

This paper mainly focused on post-posing of negative and auxiliary verbs of ba (把) Construction in Jinpingmei (金瓶梅), based on a large amounts of the typical errors of Korean students. But the Academy of Languages in China cannot have any satisfactory interpretation on these phenomena until now and just had formed a hasty conclusion, that is an idiomatic expression or the exceptional language phenomena. Therefore, this essay will shed new lights on some distinctions of the Chinese language by reverse angle, errors of Korean students. For the first time, it claims that the historical Chinese documents, in particular, preposing of negative and auxiliary verbs of Romance of the Three Kingdoms (三國演義) securing their legitimacy for Sinocentrism. The same is true of Journey to the West (西遊記) in the 16th century during the Ming dynasty and Water Margin (水滸傳) written in vernacular Chinese rather than Classical Chinese. However, The Story of the Stone (紅樓夢: Dream of the Red Chamber) created by descendant of Booi Aha (Manchu word, meaning high official (Chinese: 包衣大臣), holds a majority of post-posing of negative and auxiliary verbs. The Plum in the Golden Vase or The Golden Lotus (金瓶梅) of unknown authorship was written by Shandong dialect. It holds a dominant majority of post-posing of negative and auxiliary verbs. It was definitely derived from post-posing mechanism of the common grammar in Altaic language. Because Historical and linguistic interchange between the Shandong dialect and the Liaodong Peninsula lead to language contact and change, the use of inter-language are alarmingly frequent during the Ming dynasty. This sounds more natural. So, Banner man that reigned Liaodong will certainly have been used inter-language (中介語, 過渡語, 語際語, Altaic Chinese (阿式漢語), a mistaken Chinese (漢語偏誤), too. Upside down a mistaken Chinese used by banner man would have influenced on the Shandong dialect.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 강태권, "圓大論文集 25", pp.55~72 (1991), 圓光大學校
  2. "태조실록. 朝鮮王朝實錄" (2014), 국사편찬위원회[URL]
  3. 김도영, "中國語文論叢 53", pp.128~150 (2012), 중국어문연구회
  4. 김도영, "『元刊本』의Neg", Aux後置에대하여, 2012, pp.(41), 249~274[DOI]
  5. 남의현, "明代前期 防御와 人口變化", 명청사연구, (26), pp.1~30 (2006), 명청사학회
  6. 남의현, "遼東都司 對外膨脹의 限界에 대한 考察 ― 山東에 대한 依存性과 對外進出의 限界性을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (27), pp.67~99 (2007), 명청사학회
  7. 陳保亞, "論語言接觸與語言聯盟" (1996), 語文出版社
  8. 陳世明, "維吾爾語實用語法" (1991), 新疆大學出版社
  9. 刁晏斌, "試論近代漢語語法的特點", 遼寧師範大學學報, 1, pp.52~58 (1991), 遼寧師範大學出版社
  10. 藩開沛, "金瓶梅的産生和作者" (1959), 人民文學出版社
  11. 關嘉祿 等, "簡明滿語語法" (2002), 遼寧民族出版社
  12. 薑德梧, "從HSK(基礎)測試的數據統計看‘把’字句的教學", 漢語學習, 5, pp.50~53 (1999), 延邊大學出版社
  13. 金道榮, "論阿爾泰語法背景下的漢語把字句偏誤的生成機制與敎學對策", 博士, 中國語言文學系, pp.2011
  14. 力提甫 托乎提, "阿爾泰語言的句法結構" (2004), 中央民族大學出版社
  15. 李小凡, "漢語方言學基礎教程" (2009), 北京大學出版社
  16. 呂叔湘, "漢語語法論文集" (1955), 科學出版社
  17. 呂叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" (1980), 商務印書館
  18. 清格爾泰, "現代蒙古語語法" (1999), 內蒙古人民出版社
  19. 王景榮, "新疆漢語方言的‘把’字句", 新疆大學學報, 2, pp.131~135 (2002), 新疆大學出版社
  20. 王力, "中國現代語法" (1985), 商務印書館
  21. 王士元, "王士元語言學論文集" (2002), 商務印書館
  22. 張惠英, "金甁梅俚俗難詞解" (1993), 社會科學文獻出版社
  23. 張蕾, "否定式‘把’字句的曆時發展", 語文學刊, 8, pp.98~103 (2006), 內蒙古師範大學出版社
  24. 張遠芬, "金甁梅新證" (1984), 齊魯書社
  25. 鄭劍平, ""金瓶梅"語法硏究" (2003), 巴蜀書社
  26. Jonathan D. Spence, "Ts’ao Yin and the K’ang-hsi Emperor; bondservant and master" (1966), Yale University Press
  27. Penfield, W, "Speech and Brain Mechani" (1959), Princeton University Press
  28. Rod Ellis., "The Study of Second Language Acquisition" (1994), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)