본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

エヴェンキ語の不定對格とその能格的特徵

The Ergativity of the Indefinite-Accusative Case in Evenki

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Evenki is a language belonging to the Tungus language family and prevailing through East Siberia widely. In this paper, I argue that the suffix -yA in Evenki has an ergativelike feature. This suffix generally appears in next two situations: one is as what is usually called ‘indefinite accusative’, and the other is with nouns before the negative noun āčin. In earlier literatures some treated this suffix as an identical suffix, and others as two different suffixes. There is no common view. I selected up all the examples including the suffix -yA from some texts, and found a peculiar distribution. It appears as next two roles: the one is as an object of transitive verbs, and the other as a subject in the sentences expressing non-existence especially with āčin. In addition it appears as an object more often in the negative sentences with indefinite pronouns. From this distribution I redefine the suffix -yA as the case marker expressing objects not existing before a speaker, or indefinite objects existing before a speaker. It is able to say that the suffix -yA in Evenki, which is typically an accusative language, plays a role as a subsidiary ergative system to express indefiniteness or non-existence. In conclusion the suffix -yA should be treated as an identical suffix.

Abstract

Evenki is a language belonging to the Tungus language family and prevailing through East Siberia widely. In this paper, I argue that the suffix -yA in Evenki has an ergativelike feature. This suffix generally appears in next two situations: one is as what is usually called ‘indefinite accusative’, and the other is with nouns before the negative noun āčin. In earlier literatures some treated this suffix as an identical suffix, and others as two different suffixes. There is no common view. I selected up all the examples including the suffix -yA from some texts, and found a peculiar distribution. It appears as next two roles: the one is as an object of transitive verbs, and the other as a subject in the sentences expressing non-existence especially with āčin. In addition it appears as an object more often in the negative sentences with indefinite pronouns. From this distribution I redefine the suffix -yA as the case marker expressing objects not existing before a speaker, or indefinite objects existing before a speaker. It is able to say that the suffix -yA in Evenki, which is typically an accusative language, plays a role as a subsidiary ergative system to express indefiniteness or non-existence. In conclusion the suffix -yA should be treated as an identical suffix.

참고문헌 (6)

  1. ????????, "???V?A???????????i???????????????i?W??", 110, pp.52~78 (1996), ???{?????w??
  2. Колесникова, В. Д., "Синтаксис эвенкийского языка" (1966)
  3. Константинова, О. А, "Эвенкийский язык" (1964)
  4. 距悚鴨循, "匕孼孺栯孺? ?晤? ? 嶋齬狀? 禎櫛訟? 秧? 渟菴莘燼特仲撓 綵堯樂, ?" (1985)
  5. Moravcsik, Edith A., "On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns", pp.233~279 (1978), North-Holland Pub
  6. Nedjalkov, I, "Evenki" (1998), London and New York: Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)