Allographic adjustments in Jurchen graphotactics: Exemplified with “monastery” and “monk”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Different from the bipartite Chinese nomenclature ever used, this paper argues a newly tripartite nomenclature instead — “logogram/logographic”, “syllabogram/syllabographic”, and “phonogram/phonographic” — to analyze the extant Jurchen writing system. Exemplified with two typical Jurchen terms for “monastery” (characteristic of logographic phoneticism) and “monk” (characteristic of precise recording of loanwords), the diverse Jurchen spelling types involved can uncover two main allographic adjustments in Jurchen graphotactics. Therefore, these significant adjustments are indicative of Jurchen writing innovations triggered mostly by the polysyllabic agglutinating language in recording based on its Chinese writing inheritances much of an isolating monosyllabicism; and the terminological deviation of “syllabogram/syllabographic” from “phonogram/phonographic” can properly describe such an organic modification of one writing system to another lingual system with different typological features.
Abstract
Different from the bipartite Chinese nomenclature ever used, this paper argues a newly tripartite nomenclature instead — “logogram/logographic”, “syllabogram/syllabographic”, and “phonogram/phonographic” — to analyze the extant Jurchen writing system. Exemplified with two typical Jurchen terms for “monastery” (characteristic of logographic phoneticism) and “monk” (characteristic of precise recording of loanwords), the diverse Jurchen spelling types involved can uncover two main allographic adjustments in Jurchen graphotactics. Therefore, these significant adjustments are indicative of Jurchen writing innovations triggered mostly by the polysyllabic agglutinating language in recording based on its Chinese writing inheritances much of an isolating monosyllabicism; and the terminological deviation of “syllabogram/syllabographic” from “phonogram/phonographic” can properly describe such an organic modification of one writing system to another lingual system with different typological features.
참고문헌 (16)
- "The Ritsumeikan bungaku", 2001, 1~30
- Aisin Gioro Ulhicun, (2002), Meizandoh
- Aisin Gioro Ulhicun, (2009), Shoukadoh
- Carney, Edward, "A survey of English spelling" (1994), Taylor & Francis
- Chu, Taisong, , pp.83~90 (2002), Dep. of Chinese Language & Literature, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
- Frellesvig, Bjarke, "A History of the Japanese language" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Haspelmath, Martin, "Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook" (2009), De Gruyter Mounton
- "Journal of Inner Mongolia University: Humanities & social sciences", 1962, 10~14 (1962)
- Jin, Guangping, (1980), Cultural Relics Press
- Jin, Qicong, (1984), Cultural Relics Press
- Miyake, Marc H., "Pre-Sino-Korean and pre-Sino-Japanese: Reexamining an old problem from a modem perspective", Japanese, 1997, pp.6, 179~211[DOI]
- Robbeets, Martine Irma, "Is Japanese related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic, and Turkic" (2005), Harrassowitz Verlag
- "The Korean journal of Chinese characters", 2009, 265~282 (2009)
- "Journal of Ocean University of China: Social sciences", 2011, 84~90 (2011)
- Ulhicun, , pp.230~241 (1998), Shaanxi People’s Art Publisher
- Vovin, Alexander, "A reference grammar of classical Japanese prose" (2003), RoutledgeCurzon