미국법상 경영판단의 원칙에 관한 비판적 소고 - 주주와 회사 이익 보호의 관점에서 -
A Study on U.S. Business Judgment Rule
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The business judgment rule has been a part of the American legal system for about 180 years. It was implemented with the aim of respecting the independence of the boards in taking business decisions, by lessening the interference of judicial review. Currently, it is believed that this rule will be enforced in Korea, and most Korean scholars are supporting the introduction of this rule. However, it is reasonable to consider the business judgment rule not as a rule of law but as a judicial policy. Also, the business judgment rule has several problems when viewed from the standpoints of the protection of the interests of shareholders and corporations. First, the basic logic is weak. Second, the "informed basis" factor is unreasonable. Third, the "good faith" factor is overlooked. Fourth, the business judgment rule can be abused as a guideline in order to avoid responsibilities. Finally, it can deteriorate into a "no liability rule."
참고문헌 (33)
- 이기수, "회사법" (2008), 박영사
- 김재범, "대출결정시 금융기관 이사의 주의의무와 경영판단의 원칙 -대상판결 : 대법원 2006.11.9. 선고 2004다41651, 41668 판결-", 상사판례연구, 21(1), pp.3~35 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
- 김정호, "미국회사법상 이사와 회사간 자기거래금지의 법리 - 대판 2007. 5. 10, 2005 다 4284의 평석을 겸하여 -", 고려법학, (49), pp.119~153 (2007), 법학연구원
- 양만식, "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 지배구조론의 전개", 상사법연구, 24(1), pp.177~231 (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 유진희, "미국 회사법상 이사의 주의의무", 서강법학연구, 3 (2001), 서강대학교 법학연구소
- 이대희, "미국 회사지배구조에 관한 최근 경향과 기관투자가의 역할 분석", 안암법학, 4 (1996), 안암법학회
- 이상돈, "법률적 삼단논법의 인식론적 오류", 안암법학, 3 (1995), 안암법학회
- 정찬형, "사외이사제도의 개선방안", 고려법학, (40) (2003), 고려대학교 법학연구원
- 최병규, "독일 회사법 변천의 시사점과 한국회사법 개정방향", 기업법연구, 22(4), pp.185~214 (2008), 한국기업법학회
- 최완진, "經營判斷의 原則의 새로운 動向과 韓國商法受用論", 안암법학, 통(26), pp.249~277 (2008), 안암법학회
- Alan R. Palmiter, "Corporations - Examples and Explanations" (2006), Aspen
- D. Gordon Smith, "Business Organizations - Cases, Problems, and Case Studies" (2004), Aspen
- Frank A. Gevurtz, "Corporation Law" (2000), West Group
- Jeffrey D. Bauman, "Corporations Law and Policy - Materials and Problems" (2007), Thomson West
- Roberta Romano, "The Genius of American Corporate Law" (1993), The AEI Press
- Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Corporate Law" (2009), Foundation Press & Thomson West
- Douglas M. Branson, "Intracorporate Process and the Avoidance of Director Liability", Wake Forest L. Rev, 24, pp.97~ (1989)
- E. Norman Veasey, "What Happened in Delaware Corporate Law and Governance from 1992-2004? A Retrospective on Some Key Developments", U. Pa. L. Rev, 153, pp.1399~ (2005)
- Frank A. Gevurtz, "The Business Judgment Rule: Meaningless Verbiage of Misguided Notion?", S. Cal. L. Rev, 67, pp.287~ (1994)
- Joel Seligman, "The New Corporate Law", Brook. L. Rev, 59, pp.1~ (1993)
- Larry E. Ribstein, "Corporations and the Market for Law", U. Ill. L. Rev, 2008, pp.661~ (2008)
- Lyman Johnson, "The Modest Business Judgment Rule", Bus. Law, 55, pp.625~ (2000)
- Lyman P. Q. Johnson, "Corporate Officers and the Business Judgement Rule", Bus. Law, 60, pp.439~ (2005)
- Lyman P. Q. Johnson, "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Fiduciary Duties", Wm. Mitchell L. Rev, 30, pp.1149~ (2004)
- Melvin A. Eisenberg, "The Conception that the Corporation is a Nexus of Contracts, and the Dual Nature of the Firm", J. Corp. L, 24, pp.819~ (1998)
- Melvin A. Eisenberg, "The Divergence of Standards of Conduct and Standards of Review in Corporate Law", Fordham L. Rev, 62, pp.437~ (1993)
- Michael J. Kennedy, "The Business Judgment Syllogism--Premises Governing Board Activity", PLI, 2002, pp.1316, 285~
- Molly J. Staab, "Comment: The Business Judgment Rule in Kansas: From Black and White to Grey", Washburn L. J, 41, pp.231~ (2001), Grey v. Manhattan Medical Center, Inc
- Paula J. Dalley, "The Business Judgment Rule: What You Thought You Know", Consumer Fin. L. Q. Rep, 60, pp.24~ (2006)
- Scott P. Towers, "Ivanhoe Partners v. Newmont Mining Corp. - The Unocal Standard: More Bark than Bite?", Del. J. Corp. L, 15, pp.483~ (1990)
- Stephen M. Bainbridge, "The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine", Vand. L. Rev, 57, pp.83~ (2004)
- Steven A. Ramirez, "The End of Corporate Governance Law: Optimizing Regulatory Structures for a Race to the Top", Yale J. on Reg, 24, pp.313~ (2007)
- William T. Allen, "Realigning the Standard of Review of Director Due Care with Delaware Public Policy: A Critique of Van Gorkom and its Progeny as a Standard of Review Problem", Nw. U. L. Rev, 96, pp.449~ (2002)