미국 판례상 임원에 대한 경영판단의 원칙 적용여부
The Applicability of Business Judgment Rule to the Corporate Officers in the U.S. Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The Applicability of Business Judgment Rule to the Corporate Officers in the U.S. Cases In the U.S., it is usually recognized by the most commentators that the status and liability of corporate officers are similar to those of the directors and that the business judgment rule applies to the corporate officers as well as the directors. However, the cases on the applicability of business judgment rule to the corporate officers are divided into three groups: decisions agreeing on the applicability of the rule to the officers, decisions disagreeing on the applicability of the rule to the officers, and the decision not deciding on the issue based on the procedural defect. Some scholars even argue that the case law on whether the rule applies to the officer is not clearly established. When the Korean Commercial Code introduces corporate officer, it must be decided whether business judgment rule applies to the officers and, if applied, whether the rule applies with same fashion to the officers. The U.S. cases on the applicability of business judgment rule will give strong implication to the interpretation of Korean Commercial Code. When the business judgment rule applies to the officers, it is required to figure out first whether the premise of the rule exists on the corporate officers, and the rationales of the applicability of the rule can justify such application to the officers. Thus the applicability of the rule should not be decided merely by the reason of the similarity of the status between officers and directors.
참고문헌 (27)
- "상법강의 (상)" (2006), 박영사
- "임원제도도입에 따른 법적문제", 20(2) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 지배구조론의 전개" (2005), 한국상사법학회
- "임원제도의 도입에 관한 연구", 22(5) (2004), 한국상사법학회
- "이사의 의무와 책임" (2003)
- "경영판단의 원칙", 6(1) (1999), 한국비교사법학회
- "경영판단의 원칙의 도입여부를 다시 논함", 19(2) (2000), 한국상사법학회
- "미국법상의 경영판단원칙과 그 도입 여부에 관한 일고찰", 18(2) (1999), 한국상사법학회
- "경영판단원칙의 수용가능성" (2001), 한국기업법학회
- "미국회사법에서의 이사의 의무와 경영판단의 법칙" (2000), 한국비교사법학회
- "경영판단의 법칙의 수용에 관한 검토", 19(1) (2000), 한국상사법학회
- "이사의 주의의무와 경영판단의 법칙간의 관계에 관한 미국법 고찰" (2002), 한국상사법학회
- "미국법상 경영판단의 원칙과 우리나라에의 도입가능성" (2000), 안암법학회
- "경영판단원칙의 상법에의 도입가부에 관한 검토" (2000), 한국기업법학회
- "주주대표소송과 경영판단의 원칙", 17(3) (1999), 한국상사법학회
- "경영판단의 원칙에 관한 미국법의 최근동향", 15(2) (1996), 한국상사법학회
- "Principles of Corporate Governance" (1992)
- "Common Law Duties of Non-Director Corporate Officers" (1992)
- "Corporate Officers and the Business Judgment Rule", 60(865) (2005)
- "Corporate Officers^the Business Judgment Rule", 60(439) (2005)
- "Recalling Why Corporate Officers Are Fiduciaries", 48(1597) (2005)
- "An Historical Perspective on the Duty of Care the Duty of Loyalty and the Business Judgment Rule", pp.40~ (1987)
- "The Business Judgment Rule As Abstention Doctrine", 57(37) (2004)
- "The Business Judgment Syllogism" (2002)
- "OmniBank of Mantee v", pp.~76 (1992)
- "Principles of Corporate Governance Common Law Duties of Non-Director Corporate Officers A Reply to Professor Johnson An Historical Perspective on the Duty of Care the Duty of Loyalty and the Business Judgment Rule The Business Judgment Rule As Abstention Doctrine", pp.46 40 57~
- "OmniBank of Mantee v", pp.1989 42 629 739 560~1083 747 848 717 389 76 1253 27 (1989), Inc In re the Walt Disney Co