經營判斷의 原則의 適用範圍 - 미국의 사례를 중심으로 -
The scope of the applicability of the Business Judgment Rule in the U.S. cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The scope of the applicability of the Business Judgment Rule in the U.S. cases The business judgment rule is a helpful description of a basic principle applicable to business decisions by boards of directors. By the application of that rule, the decisions made by the board of directors upon reasonable information and with some rationality do not give rise to directorial liability for many types of actions that turn out badly from the standpoint of the corporation. The business judgment rule has been involved in numerous cases brought against directors of corporations that face unwanted takeover attempts and adopt defensive tactics designed to defeat the takeover. In the derivative litigation, the application of the business judgment rule has been controversial. In the U.S., it is normally recognized that the policies that have given rise to the application of the business judgment rule to directors apply with equal force to the actions of officers within their delegated discretionary authority. some commentator urged that the business judgment rule should not extend to non-director officers. But I ultimately disagree with his views. Recently Korean government tries to amend the Korean Commercial Code to introduce the advanced legal system. But the business judgment rule is not included in the amendment. A lot of Korean companies tries to be globalized in many aspects. Their management have discretionary authority in conducting domestic as well as international business. I think it is required to protect the management by the business judgment rule.
참고문헌 (15)
- "상법강의(상)" (2005), 박영사
- "경영판단의 원칙", 17집 (2004), 한국기업법학회
- "경영판단의 원칙의 적용요건", 20(1) (2006), 한국기업법학회
- "적대적 M$A에 대응한 이사의 방어행위에 대한 법적 평가", (12) (2005), 서울대학교금융법센타
- "경영판단의 원칙과 그의 수용방안", 19(2) (2005), 한국기업법학회
- "미국법상 경영판단의 원칙과 우리나라에의 도입가능성" (2000), 안암법학회
- "이사의 책임제한에 관한 법리와 경영판단의 원칙" (2006), 한국경영법률학회
- "미국법상의 경영판단원칙과 그 도입여부에 대한 일고찰", 18(2) (1999)
- "경영판단의 원칙", 6(1) (1999), 한국비교사법학회
- "경영판단의 원칙의 도입여부를 다시 논함", 19(2) (1999), 한국상사법학회
- "Corporations and Other Business Associations" (1996), Little, Brown and Company
- "Corporations" (2003)
- "Corporations (Cases and Materials)" (1995), Little, Brown and Company
- "The Law of Corporations" (2000), West Group
- "Lessons from Enron, How did corporate and securities law fail? Managing and monitoring conflicts of interest: Empowering the outside directors with independent counsel", 48(1077) (2003)
