회사법상 기업지배구조법제의 동향과 평가, 그리고 새로운 제언
A Critical Review on the Trends of Corporate Governance Regime and a New Alternative Proposal under the Corporation Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The corporate governance has been competitively reformed in the corporate world since '90s. The Korean corporate governance has also been changed according to the world regulatory trends, and the Commercial Act revision Bill, in which the western executive officer is introduced, was finally passed in the Congress, March 11, 2011. But the legal regime of Korean corporate governance, structured in the corporate law and mandatorily executed in the korean companies, has been assessed critically ineffective in controling the corporate management. It's because the most part of the governance system has been taken after the western stylish model without taking some important factors such as unique culture, tradition and social environmental peculiarity of korean companies into considerations. Futhermore current corporate law provides the companies with only a few models of corporate governance, and the chances for the companies to adopt the appropriate governance model have been insufficiently given. So it is necessary to design new effective and appropriate governance models for settling the effective management control system in korean companies. This paper analyses the reasonableness and adequacy of the current factors such as listing and size of the asset as an adopting standard of the governance models in the corporate law and comes to a conclusion that the degree of controlling shareholder's ownership of the stocks should be fundamentally considered in designing and executing the governance models in accordance with the factors like listing, size of assets and number of shareholders. In conclusion, this paper proposes a variety of newly designed governance models, based on the controlling shareholder's ownership rate.
Abstract
The corporate governance has been competitively reformed in the corporate world since '90s. The Korean corporate governance has also been changed according to the world regulatory trends, and the Commercial Act revision Bill, in which the western executive officer is introduced, was finally passed in the Congress, March 11, 2011. But the legal regime of Korean corporate governance, structured in the corporate law and mandatorily executed in the korean companies, has been assessed critically ineffective in controling the corporate management. It's because the most part of the governance system has been taken after the western stylish model without taking some important factors such as unique culture, tradition and social environmental peculiarity of korean companies into considerations. Futhermore current corporate law provides the companies with only a few models of corporate governance, and the chances for the companies to adopt the appropriate governance model have been insufficiently given. So it is necessary to design new effective and appropriate governance models for settling the effective management control system in korean companies. This paper analyses the reasonableness and adequacy of the current factors such as listing and size of the asset as an adopting standard of the governance models in the corporate law and comes to a conclusion that the degree of controlling shareholder's ownership of the stocks should be fundamentally considered in designing and executing the governance models in accordance with the factors like listing, size of assets and number of shareholders. In conclusion, this paper proposes a variety of newly designed governance models, based on the controlling shareholder's ownership rate.
참고문헌 (34)
- 權純姬, "美國과 獨逸의 企業支配構造와 최근 動向에 관한 比較 檢討", 상사법연구, 21(4), pp.6~214 (2003), 한국상사법학회
- 김순석, "상장회사에 있어 지배구조 관련 제도의 입법적 과제", 상사법연구, 26(2), pp.101~134 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 김재범, "회사지배구조 관련 회사법제의 나아갈 방향 - 2008년 상법개정안 검토", 경영법률, 19(1), pp.1~36 (2008), 한국경영법률학회
- 김재범, "주주의 충실의무에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1993
- 김재범, "회사규모와 지배구조의 개편- 2009년 개정상법을 중심으로", 기업법연구, 24(3), pp.35~61 (2010), 한국기업법학회
- 김화진, "기업의 소유지배구조와 정부의 역할", 인권과 정의, (408), pp.60~81 (2010), 대한변호사협회
- 박세화, "내부통제시스템의 설계와 기업 지배구조에 관한 회사법적 고찰", 상사법연구, 26(2), pp.287~320 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 송종준, "적대적 M&A의 법리" (2009), 도서출판 개신(충북대 출판부)
- 송종준, "證券集團訴訟의 發生要因分析과 法的 對應課題", 경영법률, 18(2), pp.163~192 (2008), 한국경영법률학회
- 안수현, "내부통제의 회사법제 정비를 위한 검토", 상사판례연구, 20(2), pp.27~78 (2007), 한국상사판례학회
- 양만식, "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 지배구조론의 전개", 상사법연구, 24(1), pp.177~231 (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 양만식, "사회적 책임투자와 기업지배구조", 기업법연구, 24(2), pp.197~229 (2010), 한국기업법학회
- 이성웅, "이해관계인주의와 기업법 -프리만의 전략경영을 중심으로", 경영법률, 19(1), pp.213~257 (2008), 한국경영법률학회
- 전삼현, "지배구조관련 상법개정의 쟁점과 개선방안, In 기업소송연구(Ⅱ)" (2005), 기업소송연구회
- 정찬형, "주식회사의 지배구조", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.9~67 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 정쾌영, "執行任員制度에 관한 商法 改正案의 問題點 檢討", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.270~296 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 최병규, "독일의 회사지배구조 모범규준 변화와 시사점", 경영법률, 18(4), pp.105~132 (2008), 한국경영법률학회
- 최성근, "2004년 OECD 기업지배구조원칙 개정의 쟁점사항 분석 및 우리 법제도와의 비교평가", 상사법연구, 26(1), pp.209~252 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 최준선, "주주자본주의와 이해관계자 자본주의", 상사법연구, 26(2), pp.169~192 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 한철, "지속가능한 발전을 위한 기업지배구조의 개선 -공적 연금기금의 법리를 중심으로-", 기업법연구, 23(3), pp.35~62 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 홍복기, "주식회사의 지배구조에 관한 2006년 회사법 개정시안", 상사법연구, 25(2), pp.163~193 (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 기업지배구조개선위원회, "기업지배구조 모범규준(1999.9. 제정, 2003.2 개정)", ~ (2003)
- 최완진, "'상사법의 좌표와 과제'", 선진상사법률연구, (53)통권 : 53, pp.3~56 (2011), 법무부
- 국회계류중인 주요 경제관련 법률안에 대한 경제계 의견보고서, "전경련", ~ (2007)
- 2009 코스닥상장법인 현황, "코스닥협회", ~ (2010)
- 한국기업지배구조원, "2009년 상장법인 지배구조 평가결과 및 기업지배구조 등급 공표(보도자료)", ~ (2009)
- "2010년 유가증권시장기업 기업지배구조 등급발표 및 평가결과분석" (2010), 한국기업지배구조원[URL]
- 한국상장회사협의회, "사외이사 도입 10년-평가와 개선과제(좌담회)", 월간 상장 (2009)
- 한국상장회사협의회, "사외이사제도 운영실태 및 개선에 대한 설문결과", 월간상장 (2009)
- 한국은행, "기업의 소유지배구조와 경영성과 간의 관계", ~ (2006)
- M. A. Weinberg, "Take-overs and Mergers", Sweet & Maxwell, ~ (1992)
- Ronald J. Gilson, "The Case against Shark Repellent Amendments : Structural Limitations on the Enabling Concept", Stan. L. Rev., 34, pp.775~ (1982)
- ALI, "Principles of Corporate Governance : Analysis and Recommendation", ~ (1992)
- OECD, "Principles of Corporate Governance(Amended)", ~ (2004)