본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「기업지배구조 상법개정안」에 관한 종합적 검토

A Comprehensive Review of Amendments to 「Korean Commercial Code on Corporate Governance」

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since the global financial crisis there has been mounting interest in desirable corporate governance worldwide and the need to improve the system to enhance management transparency has been raised in Korea as well. Given this, the Ministry of Justice preannounced a partial amendment to the Korean Commercial Code on corporate governance. In accordance with the Ministry, the amendment is aimed at improving the procedure for appointing board of directors and audit committee members, organizing the function and role of the board of directors, expanding legal remedies against the illicit acts of executives, and invigorating a general meeting of shareholders in order to lay a legal framework to lead a transparent and sound management and corporate culture. The amendment mainly covers the issues including ① introducing a multiple derivative suit system, ② strengthening the supervisory functions of the board of directors (introducing executive officer system) ③ making the concentrated vote system mandatory by stages, ④ introducing a separate election system of audit committee members, and ⑤ making electronic voting compulsory by stages. These measures will help enhance transparency in corporate governance and realize economic democratization, but may bring about problems and side effects if corporations are obliged to follow them. Thus, the Ministry should take a careful approach to implement them. In a nutshell, the Korean Commercial Code is not the law to monitor or suffocate corporations, but a fundamental belief needed to facilitate business activities and sustain and develop corporations. Against this backdrop, legislation should be enacted not to aggravate a burden on corporations and rather in a way to alleviate it. The public has not been approving of a chaebol owner who was recently indicted of inadequate management practices. However, considering the current economic conditions at home and abroad, the Code should place an emphasis on 'an entrepreneurial spirit' to help businesses make large scale investments leading to reviving the economy. Not a single country in the world has been applying an uniform corporate governance and it is not desirable to reignite controversy only a year after the corporation law was amended through heated debates.

Abstract

Since the global financial crisis there has been mounting interest in desirable corporate governance worldwide and the need to improve the system to enhance management transparency has been raised in Korea as well. Given this, the Ministry of Justice preannounced a partial amendment to the Korean Commercial Code on corporate governance. In accordance with the Ministry, the amendment is aimed at improving the procedure for appointing board of directors and audit committee members, organizing the function and role of the board of directors, expanding legal remedies against the illicit acts of executives, and invigorating a general meeting of shareholders in order to lay a legal framework to lead a transparent and sound management and corporate culture. The amendment mainly covers the issues including ① introducing a multiple derivative suit system, ② strengthening the supervisory functions of the board of directors (introducing executive officer system) ③ making the concentrated vote system mandatory by stages, ④ introducing a separate election system of audit committee members, and ⑤ making electronic voting compulsory by stages. These measures will help enhance transparency in corporate governance and realize economic democratization, but may bring about problems and side effects if corporations are obliged to follow them. Thus, the Ministry should take a careful approach to implement them. In a nutshell, the Korean Commercial Code is not the law to monitor or suffocate corporations, but a fundamental belief needed to facilitate business activities and sustain and develop corporations. Against this backdrop, legislation should be enacted not to aggravate a burden on corporations and rather in a way to alleviate it. The public has not been approving of a chaebol owner who was recently indicted of inadequate management practices. However, considering the current economic conditions at home and abroad, the Code should place an emphasis on 'an entrepreneurial spirit' to help businesses make large scale investments leading to reviving the economy. Not a single country in the world has been applying an uniform corporate governance and it is not desirable to reignite controversy only a year after the corporation law was amended through heated debates.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 주주대표소송의 현황과 관제, "강정민", 경제개혁연구소, ~, pp.ERRI 경제개혁리포트 2013-08호 (2013)
  2. 고창현, "기업지배구조 상법 개정 제2차 공청회 토론문", ~ (2013)
  3. 곽관훈, "전자투표제도 활성화를 위한 법적과제", IT와 법연구, (7), pp.145~172 (2013), IT와 법연구소
  4. 권재열, "二重代表訴訟의 許否에 대한 比較法的 檢討- 서울고등법원 2003.8.22. 선고, 2002다13746 판결을 대상으로 하여 -", 비교사법, 11(2), pp.443~475 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
  5. 권종호, "전자투표제도의 단계적 의무화의 필요성과 그 이유", ~ (2013)
  6. 김병태, "주주총회의 전자투표제도 ‘의무화’와 문제점", ~ (2013)
  7. 김재범, "이중대표소송제도의 도입 -상법에 대한 정합성 여부-", 상사법연구, 25(4), pp.27~57 (2007), 한국상사법학회
  8. 김정호, "이중대표소송관련 상법개정시안에 대하여", 법률신문, ~ (2006)
  9. 이중대표소송제도 도입의 문제점, "박신호", 전국경제인연합회, ~, pp.CER006-12 (2006)
  10. 서완석, "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 문제점 및 개선방안 연구", 성균관법학, 20(1), pp.387~414 (2008), 법학연구소
  11. 손영화, "다중대표소송제도의 도입에 관한 쟁정사항 검토", ~ (2013)
  12. 원동욱, "企業支配構造關聯 商法改正案의 主要內容 및 向後課題", 법학논총, 32(1), pp.217~255 (2008), 법학연구소
  13. 이승렬, "바람직한 기업지배구조관련 상법개정방안", KERI정책세미나자료집 (2013)
  14. 박종렬, "집행임원제도 도입에 따른 법적 제문제", 기업법연구, 10, pp.95~120 (2002), 한국기업법학회
  15. 집행임원제도 도입의 문제점, "임상혁", ~ (2006)
  16. 정경영, "독립적 사외이사, 집중투표", 기업지배구조상법개정 공청회 자료집 (2013)
  17. 정재규, "기업지배구조 상법 개정 공청회 토론문", ~
  18. 정찬형, "주식회사의 지배구조", 한국상사법학회 2009년 하계학술대회-상법학의 현대적 과제와 전망 (2009)
  19. 천경훈, "전자투표, 다중대표소송", 법무부 상법개정안 공청회자료 (2013)
  20. 지주회사의 해금과 상법관련법제에 관한 연구, "최성근", 한국법제연구원, ~, pp.연구보고 99-01 (1999)
  21. 최완진, "기업지배구조법 강의" (2011), 한국외대 출판부
  22. 최준선, "감사위원의 분리선임에 관한 쟁점사항 검토", 한국경제법학회 하계학술대회 자료집 (2013)
  23. 홍복기, "주식회사에 있어서 집행임원제도의 도입과 그 과제", 상사판례연구, 19(4), pp.89~120 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
  24. 황근수, "한국에 있어서 집행임원제도의 현황과 향후의 운용방향", 서울대학교 법학, 49(2), pp.133~163 (2008), 법학연구소
  25. David W. Locascio, "The Dilemma of the Derivative Suit", NW. U. L. Rev, 83 (1989)
  26. Frank H, "Eaterbrook Daniel R Fischel, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law" (1991), Havard University Press
  27. 건국대학교 법학연구소, "한국형 지배구조를 찾아서", 코스닥 협회⋅건국대학교 법학연구소 공동학술대회 자료집 (2013)
  28. 상법 일부개정안 입법예고에 대한 의견서, "경제개혁연대", ~ (2013)
  29. 법무부, "기업지배구조 상법 개정 제1차 공청회", ~ (2013)
  30. 법무부, "기업지배구조 상법 개정 제2차 공청회", ~ (2013)
  31. 「기업지배구조의 쟁점과 과제」 - 2013년 상법 개정안을 중심으로 -, "한국경영법률학회", ~ (2013)
  32. 상법개정안의 주요쟁점과 그 평가, "한국경제법학회", ~ (2013)
  33. 바람직한 기업지배구조 관련 상법개정 방안, "한국경제연구원", ~ (2013)
  34. 한국경제연구원, "상법개정안의 쟁점과 정책방향", KERI 정책토론회 자료집 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)