해상보험계약에 있어서 해상고유의 위험에 따른 입증책임 -영국법과 협회약관에 관한 논의를 중심으로-
The Burden of Proof in Case of the Perils of the Sea Defense in Marine Insurance Contract -Focused on the MIA & Institute Clause Hulls-
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The perils of the sea is relatively the most important part of marine insurance. The concept of insured perils signifies a very central issue under maritime insurance where the assured's property or profit are put at risk by maritime perils and the insurer agrees to indemnify the assured against any loss caused by those perils. In practice, the extent of the covered risks is determined by the agreement of the parties by selecting the appropriate set of Institute Clauses. It is a general principle that the assured claiming for a loss should discharge the burden of proving that the loss of the claim was caused by a peril insured against under the policy. However, the assured often face a difficulty in carrying this burden of proof when the vessel sank in unexplained circumstances. As for the degree of proof, the plaintiff has to prove on a balance of probabilities that the ship was lost by a perils of the seas. Therefore, in voyage policy, the presumption of the unseaworthiness can be overturned if it is proved that the ship was seaworthy at the commencement of the voyage. However, in time policy, it would be insufficient to prove that a ship was seaworthy just before the loss. When, with the privity of the assured, the ship is sent to sea in an unseaworthiness state, the insurer is not liable for any loss attributable to unseaworthiness.
Abstract
The perils of the sea is relatively the most important part of marine insurance. The concept of insured perils signifies a very central issue under maritime insurance where the assured's property or profit are put at risk by maritime perils and the insurer agrees to indemnify the assured against any loss caused by those perils. In practice, the extent of the covered risks is determined by the agreement of the parties by selecting the appropriate set of Institute Clauses. It is a general principle that the assured claiming for a loss should discharge the burden of proving that the loss of the claim was caused by a peril insured against under the policy. However, the assured often face a difficulty in carrying this burden of proof when the vessel sank in unexplained circumstances. As for the degree of proof, the plaintiff has to prove on a balance of probabilities that the ship was lost by a perils of the seas. Therefore, in voyage policy, the presumption of the unseaworthiness can be overturned if it is proved that the ship was seaworthy at the commencement of the voyage. However, in time policy, it would be insufficient to prove that a ship was seaworthy just before the loss. When, with the privity of the assured, the ship is sent to sea in an unseaworthiness state, the insurer is not liable for any loss attributable to unseaworthiness.
참고문헌 (29)
- 심재두, "해상보험법" (2001), 도서출판 지산
- 구종순, "해상보험에서 근인의 입증에 관한 연구", 한국해운학회지, (21) (1995), 한국해운학회
- 권기훈, "해상운송물 손해에 관한 감항능력 입증책임", 법과정책연구, 7(2), pp.461~484 (2007), 한국법정책학회
- 민중기, "영국해상보험법(협회선박기간약관", ITCH)에 있어서 해상고유의 위험의 의의 및 입증책임과 담보위반의 효과-대법원 1998. 5. 15. 선고 96다27773 판결, 1998, pp.(30), ~[DOI]
- 박세민, "해상보험법상 담보(warranty)의 개념과 영국 협회적하보험약관 제5조 및 상법 제706조 제1호(해상보험자 면책사유)에 관한 고찰", 한국해법학회지, 27(2), pp.107~148 (2005), 한국해법학회
- 방희석, "해상보험계약상 입증책임의 문제점과 대안", 무역학회지, 30(1), pp.63~80 (2005), 한국무역학회
- 이균성, "개정해상법과 해상기업관계자의 총체적 책임제한, In 현대상법의 과제와 전망" (1994), 삼지원
- 이시환, "해상보험에 있어서의 거증책임", 보험학회지, 5(1) (1998)
- 이원정, "해상보험계약에서 고의적 보험사고의 입증책임에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 이창길, "영국해상보험법 제39조 제5항의 “privity” 개념의 해석과 적용에 관한 고찰", 한국해법학회지, 28(2), pp.97~133 (2006), 한국해법학회
- 조종주, "선박의 내항성에 대한 해상운송인 및 해상보험자 책임의 비교고찰", 무역통상학회지, 3(1) (2003)
- 주광희, (1991)
- 채동헌, "해상보험법상 선박기간보험에 있어 감항능력 부재로 인한 보험자의 면책 및 추정전손에의 해당 여부에 관한 각종 법리", 대법원판례해설, 통권 : 40 (2002), 법원도서관
- 최명국, "국제무역환경의 변화에 따른 1906년 영국해상보험법의 문제점과 향후 발전방향에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 23(1) (1998), 한국무역학회
- 최종현, "선박보험에 있어서 원인불명침몰(unexplained sinking)에 관한 사례연구, In 보험법연구(Ⅰ)" (1995), 삼지원
- 한창희, "선박기간보험계약에 있어서 선박의 감항능력", 보험학회지, 60 (2001), 한국보험학회
- 한창희, "해상보험계약에 있어서 입증책임", 보험학회지, (75), pp.69~92 (2006), 한국보험학회
- Bennett, Howard N., "The Law of, Marine Insurance" (1996), Clarendon Press
- Donald O'May, "Marine Insurance Law and Policy" (1993), Sweet & Maxwell
- Hazelwood, Steven J., "Marine Perils and the Burden of Proof, In The Modern Law of Marine Insurance" (1996), LLP Limited
- Hodges, Susan, "Law of Marine Insurance" (1996), Cavendish Pub. Ltd.
- Ivamy E. R. Hardy, "Payne and Ivamy's Carriage & Goods by Sea, 13th ed." (1989), Butterworths
- Lamberth, R. J., "Templeman on Marine Insurance" (1986), Pitman Publishing Limited
- Michael J. Mustill, "Arnould's Law of Marine Insurance and Average, 16th ed." (1981), Stevens & Sons
- Mocatta, Alan Abraham, "Scrutton on Charterparties and Bills of Lading" (1984), Sweet & Maxwell
- Rose, F. D., "Marine Insurance : Law and Practice" (2004), LLP
- Tetley, William, "Marine Cargo Claims, 3rd ed." (1988), International Shipping Publications
- Von Ziegler, Alexander, "The Liability of the Contracting Carrier", Texas International Journal, 44 (2009)
- Wilson, John F., "Carriage of Goods by Sea, 6th ed.", pp.2008, Pearson