본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해상고유의 위험의 범위와 요건에 관한 비교 고찰

Comparative Study on Legal Requirements & the Scope of the Perils of the Sea Defense

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Perils of the sea refers to the natural accidents peculiar to the sea. It can be maritime accidents and dangers such as storms, waves, wind, collision of vessel, fire, smoke and noxious fumes; sinking, flooding and capsizing, loss of propulsion or steering, and any other hazards resulting from the unique environment of the sea. Other than inevitable perils or accidents upon the sea are not excused, whether there is a bill of lading containing the expression of peril of the sea. It also includes accidents caused as a result of stranding, striking a submerged object, or encountering heavy weather or other unusual forces of nature. After reviewing the meaning of the term ‘perils of the sea’, there is a fact that the meaning of the term has yet to be fully established. The definition of the term as provided under the Rules for Construction of Policy 7, which refers only to fortuitous accidents or casualties of the seas and does not include the ordinary winds and waves, is deemed to be inconclusive. From the reinterpretation of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and the study of the various judicial decisions affecting this area of marine insurance, there is found to be an urgent need to have a reviewed definition and interpretation of the term. In discussing perils of the sea, three important points have often appeared. When the term ‘perils of the sea’ are mentioned, what often crosses our minds is the picture of a ship tumbling in exceptionally forceful winds and extraordinarily violent waves. Nevertheless, by interpreting and reinterpreting the wording of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and by considering several judgements, it is found that losses by perils of the sea are not strictly confined to those caused by extraordinary violence of the winds and waves but may also include all losses proximately occasioned by the fortuitous action of the winds and waves.

Abstract

Perils of the sea refers to the natural accidents peculiar to the sea. It can be maritime accidents and dangers such as storms, waves, wind, collision of vessel, fire, smoke and noxious fumes; sinking, flooding and capsizing, loss of propulsion or steering, and any other hazards resulting from the unique environment of the sea. Other than inevitable perils or accidents upon the sea are not excused, whether there is a bill of lading containing the expression of peril of the sea. It also includes accidents caused as a result of stranding, striking a submerged object, or encountering heavy weather or other unusual forces of nature. After reviewing the meaning of the term ‘perils of the sea’, there is a fact that the meaning of the term has yet to be fully established. The definition of the term as provided under the Rules for Construction of Policy 7, which refers only to fortuitous accidents or casualties of the seas and does not include the ordinary winds and waves, is deemed to be inconclusive. From the reinterpretation of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and the study of the various judicial decisions affecting this area of marine insurance, there is found to be an urgent need to have a reviewed definition and interpretation of the term. In discussing perils of the sea, three important points have often appeared. When the term ‘perils of the sea’ are mentioned, what often crosses our minds is the picture of a ship tumbling in exceptionally forceful winds and extraordinarily violent waves. Nevertheless, by interpreting and reinterpreting the wording of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and by considering several judgements, it is found that losses by perils of the sea are not strictly confined to those caused by extraordinary violence of the winds and waves but may also include all losses proximately occasioned by the fortuitous action of the winds and waves.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 김인현, "해상법" (2011), 법문사
  2. 김인현, "해상법연구" (2002), 삼우사
  3. 김인현, "해상고유의 위험(perils of the sea)의 하나인 황천(荒天)으로 인한 해상운송인의 면책", 해양한국, (291) (1997)
  4. 손주찬, , pp.332~ (2001), 한국사법행정학회
  5. 심재두, "해상보험법" (2001), 지산
  6. 이주흥, "해상운송법" (1992), 박영사
  7. 權琦勳, "海上運送人의 不堪航責任에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1989
  8. 권기훈, "해상운송물 손해에 관한 감항능력 입증책임", 법과정책연구, 7(2), pp.461~484 (2007), 한국법정책학회
  9. 민중기, "영국해상보험법(협회선박기간약관", ITCH)에 있어서 해상고유의 위험의의의 및 입증책임과 담보위반의 효과-대법원 1998. 5. 15. 선고 96다27773판결, 1998, pp.(30), ~[DOI]
  10. 송옥렬, "해상운송에 관한 로테르담 규칙의 쟁점 및 전망", 통상법률, (88), pp.64~93 (2009), 법무부
  11. 송옥렬, "UNCITRAL 해상운송협약상 送荷人의 責任", 국제거래법연구, 16(2), pp.291~312 (2007), 국제거래법학회
  12. 이균성, "개정해상법과 해상기업관계자의 총체적 책임제한, In 현대상법의 과제와전망" (1994), 삼지원
  13. 이균성, "해상운송인의 감항능력주의의무", 한국해법회지, 2(1) (1980)
  14. 이재복, "‘perils of the seas’와 그 해석에 관한 고찰", 보험학회지, 27 (1986), 한국보험학회
  15. 이창희, "상법 제788조 1항의 해석에 관한 연구", 한국해법학회지, 27(2), pp.39~74 (2005), 한국해법학회
  16. 전영우, "해상운송계약법상 감항능력의 내용에 관한 일고찰③", 월간 해양한국, (274) (1996), 한국해사문제연구소
  17. 정영석, "해상운송인의 상사과실", 한국해법학회지, 16(1) (1994)
  18. 지상규, "감항능력 주의의무의 구성요소에 관한 고찰 -영국판례를 중심으로-", 중앙법학, 12(2), pp.199~237 (2010), 중앙법학회
  19. 최종현, "해상고유의 위험으로 인한 운송인의 면책 (대상판례:서울지방법원 2002가합13497 판결)", 한국해법학회지, 26(2), pp.229~244 (2004), 한국해법학회
  20. 한동호, "해상고유의 위험의 요건에 관한 약간의 고찰", 한국경제, 12(11) (1984)
  21. 한철, "헤이그규칙상 해상고유의 위험의 법리- The Bunga Seroja 사건을 중심으로 -", 해사법연구, 16(1), pp.75~92 (2004), 한국해사법학회
  22. 戶田修三, "注解國際海上物品運送法" (1997), 靑林書院
  23. 原茂太一, "堪航能力擔保義務論" (1983), 千倉書房
  24. 小町谷操三, "統一船荷證券法論" (1958), 勁草書房
  25. 小町谷操三, "海の危險(Perils of the Seas)について" (1984), 海商法硏究
  26. Bennett, Howard N., "The Law of, Marine Insurance" (1996), Clarendon Press
  27. Brown, R. H., "Marine Insurance-Hull Practice, 2nd ed" (1983), Witherby & Co, Ltd
  28. Colinvaux, Raoul, "Carver's Carriage by Sea, 13rd ed" (1982), Stevens & Son Ltd
  29. Dover, Victor, "A Hand Book to Marine Insurance" (1982), Witherby & Co. Ltd
  30. Hailsham of St. Marylebone, "Halsbury, Hardinge Stanley Giffard, Halsbury’s Laws of England 4th ed", Butterworths, 25 (1994)
  31. Hodges, Susan, "The Law of Marine Insurance" (1996), Cavendish Pub. Ltd
  32. Ivamy, E. R., "Payne & Ivamy’s C arriage of G oods b y Sea" (1994), Blackstone Press
  33. Ivamy, E. R. Hardy, "Casebook on Carriage by Sea" (1985), Lloyd’s of London Press Ltd
  34. Lambeth R. J., "Templeman on Marine Insurance" (1986), Pitman Publishing Limited
  35. Merkin, Robert, "Marine Insurance Legislation" (2000), LLP
  36. Michael J. Mustill, "Arnould's Law of Marine Insurance and Average, 16th ed" (1981), Stevens & Sons
  37. Mocatta, Alan Abraham, "Scrutton on Charterparties and Bills of Lading", pp.228~ (1984), Sweet & Maxwell
  38. Scrutton, Thomas J, "Charterparties and Bills of Lading, 18th ed" (1974), Sweet & Maxwell
  39. "Chapter 18 : Perils of the Sea and Similar Exceptions" (2008)[URL]
  40. Tetley, William, "Marine Cargo Claims, 3rd ed" (1988), Blais
  41. Treitel, Guenter, "Carver on Bills of Lading, 2nd ed" (2005), Sweet & Maxwell
  42. Wilson, John F., "C ar ragie o f Goods by Sea, 6th ed", pp.2008, P ear osn
  43. Baughen, Simon, "Defining the Limits of the Carrier’s Responsibilities", Lloyd’s Maritme and Commercial Law Quarterly (2005)
  44. Berlingieri, Francesco, "Carrier’s Obligation and Liability" (2007), Yearbook
  45. Daves, Martin, "International Maritime Law Application of the Hague Rules’‘Perils of the Sea’ Defence in Australia", Tulane Maritime Law Journal23 (1999)
  46. Sturley, M. F., "Modernizing and Reforming U. S. Maritime Law : The Rotterdam Rules in the United States", Texas International Law Journal (2009)
  47. Michael F. Sturley, "Selected Issues in the Work of the UNCITRAL Transport Law Project", 한국해법학회지, 28(2), pp.37~64 (2006), 한국해법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)