자본시장법상 조사 제도의 형사법적 문제점
A Critical Review on a Administrative Investigation System of Capital Market Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is a unique administrative investigation system in the former Securities and Exchange Act and Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Acts. These acts enact a provision that public officials specified by Presidential Decree (hereinafter referred to as “investigative officials”) among those who work for the Financial Services Commission to interrogate the suspect involved in such as violation, seize goods, or search a place of business, etc. The general seizure and search are banned from Korean criminal law, a warrant of seizure or of search shall be issued in cases where a seizure or search is to be affected and shall be executed by a judicial police official under the direction of a public prosecutors. In other words the seizure and search are exceptional constraint disposition. The investigative officials are not the position of special judicial police in Act on the Persons Performing the Duties of Judicial Police Officials and the Scope of their Duties. But the provision includes they can carry out constraint disposition. The problem of an administrative investigation of investigative officials is clear, of course, it is actually vastly underutilized as yet. On the other hand, the proposal to enable this system is coming. This article pointed out the problems of criminal law according to the investigations of the investigation officials who doesn't have policed powers and proposed an alternative to forced investigative authority of administrative agencies.
Abstract
There is a unique administrative investigation system in the former Securities and Exchange Act and Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Acts. These acts enact a provision that public officials specified by Presidential Decree (hereinafter referred to as “investigative officials”) among those who work for the Financial Services Commission to interrogate the suspect involved in such as violation, seize goods, or search a place of business, etc. The general seizure and search are banned from Korean criminal law, a warrant of seizure or of search shall be issued in cases where a seizure or search is to be affected and shall be executed by a judicial police official under the direction of a public prosecutors. In other words the seizure and search are exceptional constraint disposition. The investigative officials are not the position of special judicial police in Act on the Persons Performing the Duties of Judicial Police Officials and the Scope of their Duties. But the provision includes they can carry out constraint disposition. The problem of an administrative investigation of investigative officials is clear, of course, it is actually vastly underutilized as yet. On the other hand, the proposal to enable this system is coming. This article pointed out the problems of criminal law according to the investigations of the investigation officials who doesn't have policed powers and proposed an alternative to forced investigative authority of administrative agencies.
참고문헌 (20)
- 구승모, "자본시장법상 불공정거래행위 수사 현황 및 개선방안- 불공정거래행위에 대한 과징금 도입논의와 관련하여 -", 법조, 61(7), pp.54~109 (2012), 법조협회[DOI]
- 증권거래법중개정법률안 심사보고서, "국회 재정경제위원회", ~ (2001)
- 김선택, "영장청구주체입법의 변천 및 평가", 안암법학, (31), pp.1~29 (2010), 안암법학회
- 김남욱, "公正去來委員會의 强制調査權", 토지공법연구, 17, pp.10~252 (2003), 한국토지공법학회
- 김영조, "미국 행정법상 행정조사의 법리에 관한 고찰", 토지공법연구, 21, pp.159~184 (2004), 한국토지공법학회
- 노정환, "현행 압수수색제도에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 실무상 문제점을 중심으로 -", 법조, 59(4), pp.5~57 (2010), 법조협회
- 박정훈, "컴퓨터프로그램보호법상 단속처분 및 행정조사법제의 문제점과 개선방안", 행정법연구, 10, pp.1~14 (2003), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 박임출, "내부자거래의 구성요건인 중요정보의 성립시기 - 결정사실을 중심으로 -", 외법논집, 34(2), pp.149~165 (2010), 법학연구소
- 배종대, "신형사소송법 제3판" (2011), 홍문사
- 배종혁, "자본시장 불공정거래 행위에 대한 수사 시스템의 문제점과 개선방안", 자본시장 불공정거래행위에 대한 효율적 규제방안 모색을 위한 심포지엄 (2010), 법무부
- 사법연수원, "수사절차론" (2007)
- 신동운, "일제하의 예심제도에 관하여-그 제도적 기능을 중심으로", 서울대학교 법학, 27(1) (1986), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 영장실질심사제도의 실시와 영장주의의 새로운 전개, In 새로운 인신구속제도 연구, "신동운", 대법원, ~ (1996)
- 신우철, "근대 사법제도 성립사 비교연구 -한국에 있어서 ‘사법독립’ 원리의 태동 수용과 전개-", 서울대학교 법학, 49(2), pp.256~285 (2008), 법학연구소
- 오경식, "공정거래법상 범칙조사권의 강제성 부여 방안에 대한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.279~306 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 吳峻根, "“행정조사”의 공법이론적 재검토", 공법연구, 31(3), pp.23~23 (2003), 한국공법학회
- 이근우, "사실상 수사로서 행정조사의 형사절차적 한계", 석사, 법학, pp.2004
- 이근우, "특별사법경찰제의 체계적 통일성을 위한 기초연구", 안암법학, (35), pp.183~213 (2011), 안암법학회
- 최영승, "형사소송법" (2012), 대명
- 황성욱, "令狀主義의 觀點에서 본 金融去來報告制度 : FIU에 대한 法治國家的 體制方案을 中心으로", 석사, 법학과, pp.2012
