‘퍼블리시티권’ 인정에 대한 비판적 소고
Study on the Approval of the Right of Publicity
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Currently, in Korea whether to admit the "right of publicity" or not has been controversial and there are only the decisions of the lower courts not yet coming out Supreme Court's decision about "right of publicity". In this situation the difference of litigation results on similar matters makes the litigants feel unjustly, therefore lead to the distrust of the trial. On the basis of this critical perspective, this paper analyzed the Judicial precedents and application limits of the current law for the 'right of publicity' to review the need for recognition of the 'right of publicity' as an independent right. In Korea's legislative framework in order to be admitted Property right, such rights has expressly based on the statute or shall be recognized as the common law by civil law Article first. However until now right of publicity can not be considered as ' permanent and common practice' and does not form a 'legal certainty', so it can not be considered as recognized by the common law rights. Therefore the right of publicity should be codified into law as a new right. But the recognition of new rights will inevitably entail a limitation of other rights. Recognition of the right of publicity is to restrict freedom of expression, freedom of business and so on. therefore the recognition of new property rights should be based on a solid support and strong evidence. However, the right of publicity can be solved by the extension of the object in the right of likeness that has already been established and the new supplementary general clause(Article 2, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 10) to the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act. Its introduction as a legal right is still controversial in most countries except the United States and the internationally established principles do not exist. It can also be caused only relatively unequal protection of interests of the nationals because of difficulties in exercising enforcement jurisdiction. Therefore, to codify the right of publicity as a new property right is undesirable in terms of its feasibility and effectiveness.
Abstract
Currently, in Korea whether to admit the "right of publicity" or not has been controversial and there are only the decisions of the lower courts not yet coming out Supreme Court's decision about "right of publicity". In this situation the difference of litigation results on similar matters makes the litigants feel unjustly, therefore lead to the distrust of the trial. On the basis of this critical perspective, this paper analyzed the Judicial precedents and application limits of the current law for the 'right of publicity' to review the need for recognition of the 'right of publicity' as an independent right. In Korea's legislative framework in order to be admitted Property right, such rights has expressly based on the statute or shall be recognized as the common law by civil law Article first. However until now right of publicity can not be considered as ' permanent and common practice' and does not form a 'legal certainty', so it can not be considered as recognized by the common law rights. Therefore the right of publicity should be codified into law as a new right. But the recognition of new rights will inevitably entail a limitation of other rights. Recognition of the right of publicity is to restrict freedom of expression, freedom of business and so on. therefore the recognition of new property rights should be based on a solid support and strong evidence. However, the right of publicity can be solved by the extension of the object in the right of likeness that has already been established and the new supplementary general clause(Article 2, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 10) to the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act. Its introduction as a legal right is still controversial in most countries except the United States and the internationally established principles do not exist. It can also be caused only relatively unequal protection of interests of the nationals because of difficulties in exercising enforcement jurisdiction. Therefore, to codify the right of publicity as a new property right is undesirable in terms of its feasibility and effectiveness.
참고문헌 (48)
- 권오승, "관습법의 법원성", 고시계, pp.299~ (1982)
- 권상로, "퍼블리시티권의 입법화 방안에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 17(3), pp.81~101 (2010), 법학연구원
- 권태상, "퍼블리시티권의 이론적 구성에 관한 연구 : 인격권에 의한 보호를 중심으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
- 김재형, "모델소설과 인격권", 인권과정의, 통권 : 255 (1997)
- 김재형, "인격권에 관한 입법제안", 민사법학, 57, pp.41~107 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 김원일, "퍼블리시티 권리에 대한 소고-인격권, 부정경쟁방지 법리, 저작권 요소의 구별과 권리의 범위-", 법조, (556) (2003)
- 김형배, "민법학 강의" (2010), 신조사
- 김철수, "헌법학개론 제12전정판" (2000), 박영사
- 김윤명, "퍼블리시티권의 저작권법적 보호에 대한 비판적 고찰", 산업재산권, (33), pp.307~347 (2010), 한국지식재산학회
- 남형두, "세계시장 관점에서 본 퍼블리시티권 - 한류의 재산권보장으로서의 퍼블리시티권 -", 저스티스, (86), pp.101~121 (2005), 한국법학원
- 남형두, "스포츠경기와 퍼블리시티권", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법, 10(3), pp.197~243 (2007), 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회
- 남형두, "퍼블리시티권의 철학적 기반 (上)", 저스티스, (97), pp.135~166 (2007), 한국법학원
- 남형두, "퍼블리시티권의 철학적 기반 (下)", 저스티스, (98), pp.86~121 (2007), 한국법학원
- 퍼블리시티권의 입법적 보호방안 연구, "남형두", 문화관광부, ~ (2011)
- 박성호, "人格權의 變容 - 퍼블리시티권에 관한 논의를 중심으로-", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.385~406 (2006), 법학연구소
- 공연예술분야 표준계약서 제도 연구, "박영정", 한국문화관광연구원, ~, pp.기본연구 2009-3 (2009)
- 박영규, "인격권, 퍼블리시티권 그리고 지적재산권", 저스티스, 112, pp.265~293 (2009), 한국법학원
- 박준우, "부정경쟁방지법에 의한 퍼블리시티의 보호", 산업재산권, (22), pp.173~194 (2007), 한국지식재산학회
- 박준석, "퍼블리시티권의 법적성격-저작권과 상표 관련 권리 중 무엇에 더 가까운가?", 산업재산권, (30), pp.295~330 (2009), 한국지식재산학회
- 변지영, "엔터테인먼트분야의 새로운 법적 과제 -게임물, 퍼블리시티권 그리고 표현의 자유-미국의 판례가 주는 교훈들", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법, 12(2), pp.11~38 (2009), 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회
- 서광민, "관습법과 사실인 관습", 고시계, pp.414~ (1991)
- 서태환, "퍼블리시티권(Right of Publicity)의 의의와 그 양도성 및 상속성", 청주법률논단, 통권 : 1 (1997)
- 안병하, "인격권의 재산권적 성격 － 퍼블리시티권 비판 서론 －", 민사법학, 45(1), pp.71~122 (2009), 한국민사법학회
- 양창수, "사생활 비밀의 보호 - 사법적 측면을 중심으로", 저스티스, 통권 : 76 (2003)
- 엄동섭, "퍼블리시티(Publicity)권", 서강법학연구, 6 (2004)
- 엄동섭, "한국에서의 퍼블리시티권 논의: 법적 성격을 중심으로", 민사법학, 57, pp.109~161 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 유미진, "스포츠선수 퍼블리시티권에 관한 관계자의 인식 연구", 한국체육과학회지, 20(4), pp.109~121 (2011), 한국체육과학회
- 오승종, "퍼블리시티권 도입에 대한 검토" (2005), 박찬숙의원실
- 이병린, "초상권은 지켜져야 한다", 법률신문, ~ (1965)
- 이영규, "관습법에 관한 연구", 한양법학 (1991)
- 이영록, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구(I)-그 주체객체에 대한 미국에서의 논의를 중심으로", 저작권연구자료, 43 (2003), 저작권심의조정위원회
- 이한주, "퍼블리시티권에 관하여", 사법논집, 39 (2003)
- 李 漢 周, "경주마(競走馬)의 퍼블리시티권", 저스티스, (85)통권 : 85, pp.156~188 (2005), 한국법학원
- 이호선, "퍼블리시티권 (신원 공표권)의 성격에 관한 연구 －지적재산권적 관점, 과연 타당한가?－", 법학연구, 19(4), pp.27~63 (2009), 법학연구원
- 한위수, "퍼블리서티권(성명초상 등의 상업적 이용에 관한 권리)의 침해와 민사책임(상)", 인권과정의, 통권 : 242 (1996)
- 한위수, "동(하)", 인권과정의, 통권 : 243 (1996)
- 허영, "헌법학원론, 신정12판" (1999), 박영사
- 정필운, "헌법 제22조 제2항 연구", 법학연구, 20(1), pp.189~242 (2010), 법학연구원
- 정연덕, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구－부정경쟁방지법을 중심으로－", 산업재산권, (29), pp.160~184 (2009), 한국지식재산학회
- 정희섭, "財産權으로서의 퍼블리시티(Publicity)權利", 재산법연구, 20(1), pp.133~156 (2003), 한국재산법학회
- 정경석, "肖像權의 침해요건과 구제방법", 저스티스, (98), pp.122~146 (2007), 한국법학원
- 정경석, "퍼블리시티권의 허와 실", 지적재산권, (27) (2008)
- 최형구, "퍼블리시티권의 사후존속", 산업재산권, (34), pp.335~366 (2011), 한국지식재산학회
- 최형구, "퍼블리시티권의 양도성에 대한 재검토", 산업재산권, (31), pp.267~301 (2010), 한국지식재산학회
- F. Jay Dougherty, "Foreword: The Right of Publicity - Towards a Comparative and International Perspective", Loy. L.A. Ent. L.J., 18 (1998)
- Kevin S. Marks, "An Assesment of the Copyright Model in Right of Publicity Cases", Cal. L. Rev., 70 (1982)
- Rosemary J. Coombe, "Authorizing the Celebrity: Publicity Rights, Postmodern Politics, and Unauthorized Genders", Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J., 10 (1992)
- Susanne Bergmann, "Publicity Rights in the United States and in Germany : A Comparative Analysis", Loy. L.A. Ent.L.J., 19 (1999)