본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

십대 아동학대 피해 신고군, 비신고위험군, 비신고일반군의 자녀, 부모, 가족 특성 비교

Comparisons of Child, Parental, and Familial Features among Child-Maltreatment Reported, Non-Reported At-Risk, and Non-Reported Intact Teen Groups

김현수|이상균|김세원|이봉주|YOO JOAN PAEK|진미정
한국아동심리치료학회 (Korean Association Of Psychotherapy For Children)|2018.02|한국아동심리치료학회지 (Korean Journal of Child Psychotherapy)|제13권 제1호|pp. 17-38|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.23931/kacp.2018.13.1.17

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

아동학대가족특성child maltreatment아동학대-신고된 십대아동학대 고위험 십대자녀특성부모특성maltreatment-reported teensat-risk teens for child maltreatmentchild featuresparental features)familial features

초록

This study aimed to identify child, parental, and familial features useful in differentiating among child-maltreatment reported, non-reported at-risk, and non-reported intact teen groups. To address this purpose, the study included health, academic achievement, inattentive/hyperactive behaviors, conduct problems, emotional symptoms, and self-esteem for child features, health, self-esteem, depression, and warm/accepting parenting attitudes for parental features, and parental employment, marital status, education, SES, familial relationships, and familial resources for familial features. Study participants were children between the ages of 10 to 18 along with their parents. Maltreatment-reported teens along with their abusive parents were recruited from Child Protection Agencies nationwide (42 teen-parent dyads). Community teens along with their parents were recruited from elementary, junior high, and high schools as well as local child and adolescent welfare centers in Seoul, Incheon, and Gyunggi areas. This community sample was divided into two groups, the intact group (91 teen-parent dyads) and the at-risk group (179 teen-parent dyads), based on scores of the child-reported abuse/neglect scale. Chi square tests and F tests showed significant group differences in all 16 child, parental, and familial variables investigated in the study. Logistic regression analyses revealed that parental status of not being in marriage, low SES, child inattentive/hyperactive behaviors, parental depression, and poor familial relationships increased the risk of being in the maltreatment-reported group as compared to the intact group and that parental college education or upper, poor child health, and poor familial relationships increased the risk of being in the at-risk group as compared to the intact group. In addition, parental status of not being in marriage, parental education below college, parental low self-esteem, and child's low academic achievement, conduct problems, and high self-esteem were found to increase the risk of being in the maltreatment-reported group as compared to the at-risk group. Through this study, we could understand which child, parental, and familial factors increase the risk for child maltreatment. Given the findings, we can derive practical tips regarding preventive interventions for child maltreatment.

Abstract

This study aimed to identify child, parental, and familial features useful in differentiating among child-maltreatment reported, non-reported at-risk, and non-reported intact teen groups. To address this purpose, the study included health, academic achievement, inattentive/hyperactive behaviors, conduct problems, emotional symptoms, and self-esteem for child features, health, self-esteem, depression, and warm/accepting parenting attitudes for parental features, and parental employment, marital status, education, SES, familial relationships, and familial resources for familial features. Study participants were children between the ages of 10 to 18 along with their parents. Maltreatment-reported teens along with their abusive parents were recruited from Child Protection Agencies nationwide (42 teen-parent dyads). Community teens along with their parents were recruited from elementary, junior high, and high schools as well as local child and adolescent welfare centers in Seoul, Incheon, and Gyunggi areas. This community sample was divided into two groups, the intact group (91 teen-parent dyads) and the at-risk group (179 teen-parent dyads), based on scores of the child-reported abuse/neglect scale. Chi square tests and F tests showed significant group differences in all 16 child, parental, and familial variables investigated in the study. Logistic regression analyses revealed that parental status of not being in marriage, low SES, child inattentive/hyperactive behaviors, parental depression, and poor familial relationships increased the risk of being in the maltreatment-reported group as compared to the intact group and that parental college education or upper, poor child health, and poor familial relationships increased the risk of being in the at-risk group as compared to the intact group. In addition, parental status of not being in marriage, parental education below college, parental low self-esteem, and child's low academic achievement, conduct problems, and high self-esteem were found to increase the risk of being in the maltreatment-reported group as compared to the at-risk group. Through this study, we could understand which child, parental, and familial factors increase the risk for child maltreatment. Given the findings, we can derive practical tips regarding preventive interventions for child maltreatment.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 강지영, "가정 내 영유아학대사례의 예측변인에 대한 연구: 학령기 아동학대사례에 대한 이해를 병행하여", 아동과 권리, 21(2), pp.177~202 (2017), 한국아동권리학회
  2. 김광혁, "가족배경이 학령 전 아동의 신체적 학대에 미치는 영향", 한국사회복지학회 학술대회 자료집, pp.541~548 (2005)
  3. 김광혁, "가족빈곤이 아동학대 및 방임에 영향을 미치는 경로 - 부모의 우울 및 가족관계의 매개효과를 중심으로", 한국생활과학회지, 17(5), pp.847~860 (2008), 한국생활과학회
  4. 김문정, "아동이 지각한 부모양육행동과 아동의 행동문제간의 관계", 석사, 아동·가족학, pp.2004
  5. 김형모, "아동학대 유형별 학대관련 요인에 관한 연구", 경기대학교 사회과학논총, 5, pp.31~52 (2002)
  6. 김혜영, "아동학대 유형별 영향을 미치는 부모위험요인에 관한 연구", 아동과 권리, 6(2), pp.269~285 (2002), 한국아동권리학회
  7. 노충래, "아동 및 가해자의 특성에 따른 아동학대의 심각성 예측요인에 관한 연구", 한국아동복지학, (13), pp.123~154 (2002), 한국아동복지학회
  8. 박명숙, "아동학대 유발요인으로서 장애아동부모의 스트레스에 관한 연구", 한국사회복지학, 51, pp.311~327 (2002), 한국사회복지학회
  9. 朴永愛, "부모의 양육행동 및 형제관계와 아동의 자존감과의 관계", 박사, 가정학, pp.1995
  10. 박영준, "보호자로부터의 학대경험이 아동의 학교적응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 －우울과 공격성의 매개효과를 중심으로－", 한국아동복지학, (46), pp.85~114 (2014), 한국아동복지학회
  11. 박현선, "빈곤청소년의 위험 및 보호요소가 학교 적응유연성에 미치는 영향", 사회복지연구, 11, pp.23~52 (1998)
  12. 박현선, "부모의 학대와 자녀의 공격성의 종단적 상호인과관계: 빈곤 및 비빈곤 집단 차이를 중심으로", 학교사회복지, 29, pp.1~24 (2014), 한국학교사회복지학회
  13. 박혜숙, "아동학대의 발생원인과 유형별 분석을 통한 조치방안 연구", 21세기사회복지연구, 10(2), pp.287~311 (2013)
  14. 2016 전국아동학대 현황보고서, "보건복지부", ~ (2017)
  15. 소숙희, "부모의 스트레스가 아동학대에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1986
  16. 안선경, "아동학대에 영향을 미치는 가족영역의 보호요인과 위험요인에 관한 메타분석", 한국가족복지학, (38), pp.331~358 (2012), 한국가족사회복지학회[DOI]
  17. 이상균, "아동학대사례의 잠재유형화와 유형별 재학대 위험요인", 사회복지연구, 48(3), pp.171~208 (2017), 한국사회복지연구회[DOI]
  18. 이상준, "시설청소년의 심리사회적 적응과 양육환경- 일반청소년과의 비교를 중심으로 -", 청소년학연구, 15(3), pp.49~69 (2008), 한국청소년학회
  19. 이정아, "청소년의 방임 및 학대 경험이 정서.행동문제에 미치는 영향: 자아존중감의 매개효과를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2018
  20. 이현기, "아동학대 유형별 위험요인에 관한 연구", 사회복지정책, (23), pp.77~108 (2005), 한국사회복지정책학회
  21. 이해리, "청소년의 역경과 긍정적 적응 : 유연성의 역할", 박사, 상담심리, pp.2007
  22. 장화정, "가정 내 위기 요인과 아동학대의 관계", 아동권리연구, 4(2), pp.125~136 (2000)
  23. 조은정, "피학대 위험군 아동의 사회적 탄력성에 영향을 미치는 보호요인 : 피학대 위험군 아동과 일반군 아동의 비교를 중심으로", 청소년문화포럼, (39), pp.177~208 (2014), (사)한국청소년문화연구소[DOI]
  24. 현안나, "초등학생들의 아동학대 잠재적 집단 유형과 심리사회적 적응", 학교사회복지, 21, pp.83~111 (2011), 한국학교사회복지학회
  25. Belsky, J., "Child maltreatment: An ecological integration", American Psychologist, 35, pp.320~335 (1980)[DOI]
  26. Bolger, K. E., "Developmental pathways from child maltreatment to peer rejection", Child Development, 72, pp.549~568 (2001)[DOI]
  27. Brown, J., "A longitudinal analysis of risk factors for child maltreatment: Findings of a 17-year prospective study of officially recorded and self-reported child abuse and neglect", Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, pp.1065~1078 (1998)[DOI]
  28. Cook, A., "Complex trauma in children and adolescents", Psychiatric Annals, 35(5), pp.390~398 (2005)[DOI]
  29. Egeland, B., "Prospective study of the significance of life stress in the etiology of child abuse", Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, pp.195~205 (1980)
  30. Elliott, G. C., "Child physical abuse and self-perceived social isolation among adolescents", Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, pp.1663~1684 (2005)[DOI]
  31. Evans, S. E., "Exposure to domestic violence: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent outcomes", Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, pp.131~140 (2008)[DOI]
  32. Fergusson, D. M., "Physical punishment. maltreatment during childhood and adjustment in young adulthood", Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, pp.617~630 (1997)[DOI]
  33. Garbarino, J., "The human ecology of children child maltreatment: A conceptual model for research", Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, pp.721~735 (1977)[DOI]
  34. Goodman, R., "The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note", Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, pp.581~586 (1997)[DOI]
  35. Kaminski, J. W., "Evidence base update for psychosocial treatments for disruptive behaviors in children", Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46, pp.477~499 (2017)[DOI]
  36. Kazdin, A. E., "Parent management training: Treatment of oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents" (2005), Oxford University Press
  37. Kim, J., "A longitudinal study of child maltreatment, mother-child relationship quality and maladjustment: The role of self-esteem and social competence", Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, pp.341~354 (2004)[DOI]
  38. Luthar, S. S., "Vulnerability and resilience: A study of high-risk adolescents", Child Development, 62, pp.600~616 (1991)[DOI]
  39. Luthar, S. S., "The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work", Child Development, 71, pp.543~562 (2000)[DOI]
  40. Pirooz, M., "Multiple relationships between self-esteem, assertiveness and self-efficacy among female students with parents perfectism in Shahrekord Guidance Schools", Advanced Social Humanities and Management, 2, pp.14~19 (2015)
  41. Radloff, L. S., "The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population", Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), pp.385~401 (1977)[DOI]
  42. Rosenberg, M., "Society and the adolescent self-image" (1965), Princeton University Press
  43. Schaefer, E. S., "A configurational analysis of children's reports of parent behavior", Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, pp.552~557 (1965)[DOI]
  44. Sousa, C., "Longitudinal study on the effects of child abuse and children's exposure to domestic violence, parent-child attachments, and antisocial behavior in adolescence", Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, pp.111~136 (2011)[DOI]
  45. Spinazzola, J., "Survey evaluates complex trauma exposure, outcome, and intervention among children and adolescents", Psychiatric Annals, 35, pp.433~439 (2005)[DOI]
  46. Straus, M. A., "Violence against women: Classic papers", pp.187~197 (2005), Pearson Education Inc
  47. Voegler, M. E., "Risk and protective factors associated with social resilience in homeless youth", doctoral, pp.2000
  48. 유영주, "가족강화를 위한 한국형 가족건강성 척도 개발 연구", 한국가족관계학회지, 9(2), pp.119~151 (2004), 한국가족관계학회

관련 논문AI추천

Child Abuse and Problematic Behaviors in Early Adolescence: Categorization and Impact Factors김성희, 남석인인문사회과학연구소 · 인문사회과학연구2022 · 제30권 제2호아동학대 발생 환경 내의 누적적 위험요인과 아동 문제행동 간의 종단 연구: 아동학대 변화궤적 잠재계층의 매개요인을 중심으로김기현, 장희선한국사회복지연구회 · 사회복지연구2020 · 제51권 제1호아동학대사례의 잠재유형화와 유형별 재학대 위험요인김세원, 김현수, 박지명, 이봉주, 이상균, 장화정, 진미정, YOO JOAN PAEK한국사회복지연구회 · 사회복지연구2017 · 제48권 제3호아동학대행위자 및 학대피해아동 유형화 및 관계에 대한 연구- 잠재계층분석을 적용하여-김세원, 김현수, 이봉주, 이상균, 장화정, YOO JOAN PAEK한국아동가족복지학회 · 한국가족복지학2019 · 제66호초등학생들의 아동학대 잠재적 집단 유형과 심리사회적 적응현안나한국학교사회복지학회 · 학교사회복지2011 · 제21권 메타분석을 활용한 정서학대 발생에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 : 부모요인을 중심으로김미정, 염동문, 이경은한국청소년정책연구원 · 한국청소년연구2013 · 제24권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

어머니의 언어통제유형과 유아교사관계가 유아의 자아존중감에 미치는 영향우희정pp. 1-16집단미술놀이치료 프로그램이 시설여자청소년의 자립의지에 미치는 효과전윤경, 한유진pp. 39-54부모의 과잉기대⋅간섭과 청소년의 신체화증상 : 우울과 공격성의 매개효과전숙영pp. 55-67
원문 보기