형사제재로서 몰수와 추징에 관한 제안－ ‘몰수추징면탈죄’의 도입 논의를 중심으로 －
Suggestions on Forfeiture and Confiscation as Criminal Sanction − Focused on Discussion of Introducing ‘Evasion of Forfeiture-Confiscation Crime’ −
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Forfeiture and confiscation exist as criminal sanction to collect all kinds of proceeds of crime. They are dealt by dual legal system under Korean Criminal Acts: criminal law as a general act and various special acts. Criminal Law clearly states that forfeiture comes under the pecuniary criminal punishment category. Confiscation should also be treated as de facto criminal punishment because it is just an alternative form that is applicable when criminal objects are impossible to be forfeited. Because forfeiture and confiscation have essential attributes as criminal punishment, laws dealing with them should accord with fundamental constitutional rules such as principle of presumption of innocence and principle of prohibition against double-jeopardy. This article suggests to legislate a Criminal Law provision called “evasion of forfeiture- confiscation crime” that would facilitate the government to punish a criminal who evades the nation’s enforcement of collection related law. And it also provides several other methods to support the effective performance of the provision.
Abstract
Forfeiture and confiscation exist as criminal sanction to collect all kinds of proceeds of crime. They are dealt by dual legal system under Korean Criminal Acts: criminal law as a general act and various special acts. Criminal Law clearly states that forfeiture comes under the pecuniary criminal punishment category. Confiscation should also be treated as de facto criminal punishment because it is just an alternative form that is applicable when criminal objects are impossible to be forfeited. Because forfeiture and confiscation have essential attributes as criminal punishment, laws dealing with them should accord with fundamental constitutional rules such as principle of presumption of innocence and principle of prohibition against double-jeopardy. This article suggests to legislate a Criminal Law provision called “evasion of forfeiture- confiscation crime” that would facilitate the government to punish a criminal who evades the nation’s enforcement of collection related law. And it also provides several other methods to support the effective performance of the provision.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김일수, "형법총론 (제11판)" (2006), 박영사
- 독립제재로서의 범죄수익몰수제도, "박미숙", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
- 추징금징수의 실효성 확보를 위한 법제도 정비방안, "박미숙", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 박승진, "각국의 몰수제도" (1999), 한국형사정책연구원
- 배종대, "형법총론 (제11판)" (2013), 홍문사
- 배종대, "신형사소송법 (제5판)" (2013), 홍문사
- 서일교, "형법각론" (1982), 박영사
- 손동권, "새로운 형사소송법" (2013), 세창출판사
- 이재상, "형법총론 (제7판)" (2011), 박영사
- 이재상, "형사소송법 (제9판)" (2012), 박영사
- 정성근, "형법총론 (전정판)" (2012), 성균관대학교출판부
- 정영석, "형법각론" (1995), 법문사
- 강영철, "재산형<벌금>의 문제점과 노역장유치의 개선방안", 교정연구, 40, pp.7~34 (2008), 한국교정학회
- 강철하, "범죄수익박탈제도의 문제점 및 개선방향", 법조, 60(10), pp.318~357 (2011), 법조협회
- 김대휘, "징벌적 추징에 관하여", 형사판례연구, 8 (2000)
- 김성호, "공직부패 방지를 위한 제도개선에 관한 연구", 박사, 형사법, pp.2003
- 김승대, "이중처벌 금지원칙에 대한 헌법해석의 재검토", 공법연구, 35(4), pp.377~406 (2007), 한국공법학회
- 도중진, "범죄수익 몰수자산기금 도입방안", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.1435~1470 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 서보학, "형법상 범죄수익 몰수의 필요성과 법치국가적 한계", 안암법학, (5) (1997)
- 정웅석, "추징금미납의 실효성 확보방안", 법조, 56(9), pp.239~274 (2007), 법조협회
- 주승희, "추징금징수의 실효성 확보방안에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사정책연구, 18(4), pp.85~108 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- "공청회 자료집, 추징금징수 실효성 확보방안 공청회" (2007), 법무부
- Bryan A. Garner, "Black’s Law Dictionary (3rd ed.)" (2006)
- David J. Fried, "Rationalizing Criminal Forfeiture", The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 79 (1988)
- Gary Maveal, "The Unemployed Criminal Alternative in the Civil War of Drug Forfeitures", American Criminal Law Review, 30 (1992)