본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Csikszentmihalyi의 몰입 요소에 근거한 학습 몰입 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구

Development and Validation of the Learning Flow Scale

0

조회

0

다운로드

201

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 학습상황에서 몰입 수준을 측정할 수 있는 학습 몰입 척도를 개발하고, 그 타당성을 검증하는데 있다. 본 연구는 초등학교 6학년 학생들을 대상으로 예비검사(339명)와 본검사(453명)를 실시하였다. 분석방법으로는 학습 몰입 척도의 신뢰도 검증 및 요인구조를 확인하기 위해 문항분석과 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였으며, 학습 몰입 척도의 타당성과 적합성을 확인하기 위해 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 우선 문헌연구를 통해 Csikszentmihalyi의 9개 몰입 요인을 잠정적 구성요인으로 설정한 후, 예비문항을 200문항 제작하였다. 예비검사 분석 결과, Csikszentmihalyi의 9개 몰입 요인 중 시간감각 왜곡 요인을 제외한 8개 요인, 51문항이 추출되었으며 설명변량은 44.4%였다. 이론적 뒷받침을 근거로 하여 19문항 추가하여 총70문항을 본검사에 시행하였다. 본검사 분석 결과, 9개 요인, 49문항이 추출되었으며 설명변량은 60.1%로 나타났다. 또한 확인적 요인분석을 실시하여 모델의 적합도를 개선하고 모델을 수정한 결과, 9개 요인, 35문항이 최종 학습 몰입 척도로 추출되었다. 확인적 요인분석 결과, GFI, AGFI, CFI, RMSEA 등의 적합도 지수가 권장수용수준보다 높게 산출되어 측정모델의 적합성을 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 타당성과 적합성 검증과정을 거쳐 학습 몰입 척도가 완성되었다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Learning Flow Scale that can measure flow level in real learning situation. This study was administered to 792 6th grade elementary school students (339 in pilot test and 453 in main test). As statistical methods, item analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA) were conducted to test the reliability of items and the factor structure. And Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA) was conducted to test the validity and fitness of the Learning Flow Scale. First, based on the results of literature review, we identified 9 components of Csikszentmihalyi's flow construct and developed the 200 pilot items. Analyzing the pilot test data, the result obtained 51 items, 8 factors except 'Transformation of Time' of Csikszentmihalyi's 9 flow factors. Based on theory, we added 19 items and conducted 70 items in main test. Analyzing the main test data, the result obtained 49 items, 9 factors. Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), improving goodness of fit of the model, and modifying the model, the result obtained 35 items, 9 factors as the final learning flow scale. As a result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), the goodness of fit indices(GFI, AGFI, CFI, RMSEA) demonstrated statistically significance and fitness of the model. The final Learning Flow Scale supported Csikszentmihalyi's 9 flow factors. The Learning Flow Scale can be used as a valid instrument to measure flow level in the learning situation. Suggestions for use of the scale and for further research are discussed.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "학습몰입검사의 제작 및 타당화 연구" (2005)
  2. "LISREL 구조방정식모델" (2006), 청람
  3. "정상학습프로그램이 몰입수준 향상에 미치는 효과" (2001)
  4. "몰입수준의 변화가 수학학업성취도 및 수학적 태도에 미치는 효과" (2003)
  5. "e-Learning 환경에서의 몰입 경험을 위한 교수학습전략 연구" (2005)
  6. "몰입에 대한 학습동기와 인지전략과의 관계", 15(3), pp.199~219 (2001)
  7. "교수몰입 척도의 개발 및 타당화" (2006)
  8. "Towards a psychology of optimal experience Review of Personality and Social Psychology", pp.13~36 (1982)
  9. "Psychological of flow in consciousness" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  10. "Optimal experience in work and leisure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology", pp.815~822 (1989)
  11. "The dynamics of intrinsic motivation Handbook of motivation theory and research", pp.45~71 (1989)
  12. "The Psychology of Optimal Experience" (1990)
  13. "The Measurement of Flow in Everyday Life Toward a Theory of Emergent Motivation Developmental Perspectives on Motivation", pp.57~97 (1993)
  14. "The roots of success and failure" (1993), Cambridge University Press
  15. "Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention" (1996), New York: Harper Collins
  16. "Creativity is forever" (1999), Kendall[DOI]
  17. "Use of Structural Education Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research Journal of Couseling Psychology", pp.425~36 (1987)
  18. "Measuring intrinsic motivation in everyday life", pp.1555~168 (1983)
  19. "and psychological well-being in a sample of young adults Journal of Community and Applied Psychology", pp.147~160 (1992)
  20. "Flow and achievement in Mathematics" (1996)
  21. "Athletes in flow a qualitative investigation of flow states in elite figure skaters Journal of applied sport psychology", pp.161~180 (1992)
  22. "Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale", 18, pp.17~35 (1996)
  23. "Toward a conceptural understanding of the flow experience in elite athletes", 67, pp.76~90 (1996)
  24. "Flow experience in sport: construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchical state and trait responses", 6(4), pp.343~371 (1999)
  25. "LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language", pp.~8 (1997), Scientific Software International, IL: Chicago
  26. "Motivational determinants of flow: contributions from self- determination theory", 139(3), pp.355~368 (1999)
  27. "The Systematic assessment of flow in daily experience Optimal Experience; Psychological studies of flow in consciousness", pp.266~287 (1988), Cambridge university press
  28. "Flow in adolescence and its relation to the school experience University of Chicago" (1978), Unpublished doctoral dissertation
  29. "the psychology of commitment", and tur(ver) (1982), Academic Press
  30. "Measuring the flow experience Among web users" (1997), Vandervilt University
  31. "Measuring the flow construct in online environment: a structural modeling approach" (1998)
  32. "Achieving flow in an online learning environment" (2004)
  33. "Designing for flow in a complex activity" (2004), New Zealand.
  34. "a comparative analysis of positive human experiences Journal of Personality and Social Psychology", pp.1361~1368 (1983)
  35. "Correspondence of personal descriptions and theoretical constructs Journal of Social Behavior and Personality", pp.169~188 (1991)
  36. "Architects of innovation Journal of Creative Behavior", pp.75~88 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)