총체적 지식의 함양으로서 공부: 듀이의 경험론에 비추어 본 공부의 의미와 성격
Study as Cultivation of a Whole Knowledge: The Nature of Study in Light of Dewey's Concept of Transaction
0
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This inquiry aims to bring out the nature and meaning of study by analyzing and expanding Dewey's metaphysical thought which is involved in his concept of transaction. It will propose and establish an alternative to the concept of study implied in the customary and widespread way of study. According to this way of study, study is identified with preparation for examination and even learning by rote to get a good record in examination; also, educational content is composed of separate propositions, which are taken for the ultimate and right answers to the questions in examination papers. Therefore to study is to learn and memorize the knowledge in textbook as it is. However, this misconception of study, a kind of myth of study, is intimately connected with the dualistic view of the traditional philosophy. The main task which Dewey tried to solve in his whole career is the traditional dualism by changing the focus of philosophical inquiry from reason to experience. For Dewey, experience is not the counterpart to reason, but is a primary and ultimate way of existence of human being as living creature. Experience is described as transacting human beings with their environment. According to the concept of 'transaction', above all, study is not to learn given textbooks in a certain way, but to investigate and inquire the learner's transaction itself, which means not to learn and receive the knowledge set up in textbooks and find the fact hidden in nature, but to inquire and seek the nature and meaning of transaction. Secondly, study is not to learn separate and independent items of proposition, which is another important assumption implied in the myth of study. In light of transaction, the existences exist as transacting relations. Any event which occurs in nature does not occur independently and separately, but relationally, interdependently, and intertwinedly. In the same taken, facts and propositions in mind form a holistic construct or a whole knowledge. Study is involved in this whole knowledge, and interested in constructing the whole. Thirdly, study which is concerned with inquiry and the learner's whole knowledge in mind is thought for the whole knowledge to develop and enlarge itself. It means that study is not to receive the given knowledge in a one-way manner, but to construct the whole knowledge which is more reasonable, stable, and coherent than that prior to inquiry. In conclusion, study is a form of living, a primary and fundamental phenomenon of living of human beings who live in the world which is made up of a complex of transaction. To live in a human being means to inquire the transacting world in order to understand it and obtain a whole knowledge more stable and coherent.
Abstract
This inquiry aims to bring out the nature and meaning of study by analyzing and expanding Dewey's metaphysical thought which is involved in his concept of transaction. It will propose and establish an alternative to the concept of study implied in the customary and widespread way of study. According to this way of study, study is identified with preparation for examination and even learning by rote to get a good record in examination; also, educational content is composed of separate propositions, which are taken for the ultimate and right answers to the questions in examination papers. Therefore to study is to learn and memorize the knowledge in textbook as it is. However, this misconception of study, a kind of myth of study, is intimately connected with the dualistic view of the traditional philosophy. The main task which Dewey tried to solve in his whole career is the traditional dualism by changing the focus of philosophical inquiry from reason to experience. For Dewey, experience is not the counterpart to reason, but is a primary and ultimate way of existence of human being as living creature. Experience is described as transacting human beings with their environment. According to the concept of 'transaction', above all, study is not to learn given textbooks in a certain way, but to investigate and inquire the learner's transaction itself, which means not to learn and receive the knowledge set up in textbooks and find the fact hidden in nature, but to inquire and seek the nature and meaning of transaction. Secondly, study is not to learn separate and independent items of proposition, which is another important assumption implied in the myth of study. In light of transaction, the existences exist as transacting relations. Any event which occurs in nature does not occur independently and separately, but relationally, interdependently, and intertwinedly. In the same taken, facts and propositions in mind form a holistic construct or a whole knowledge. Study is involved in this whole knowledge, and interested in constructing the whole. Thirdly, study which is concerned with inquiry and the learner's whole knowledge in mind is thought for the whole knowledge to develop and enlarge itself. It means that study is not to receive the given knowledge in a one-way manner, but to construct the whole knowledge which is more reasonable, stable, and coherent than that prior to inquiry. In conclusion, study is a form of living, a primary and fundamental phenomenon of living of human beings who live in the world which is made up of a complex of transaction. To live in a human being means to inquire the transacting world in order to understand it and obtain a whole knowledge more stable and coherent.
참고문헌 (31)
- 고미숙, "공부의 달인,호모 쿵푸스" (2007), 그린비
- 박철홍, "존 듀이의 成長 槪念의 再理解: 듀이의 存在論에 비추어 본 潛在 可能性의 意味", 교육철학, 1, pp.297~326 (1993), 교육철학회
- 박철홍, "知와 德은 하나인가?: 듀이의 종교적 경험에 비추어 본 학습의 성격과 知德의 관계", 도덕교육연구, 6, pp.27~56 (1994)
- 박철홍, "경험 개념의 재이해: 듀이 연구에 대한 반성과 교육학적 과제", ~ (1994)
- 박철홍, "듀이의 ‘하나의 경험’에 비추어 본 교육적 경험의 성격: 수단으로서의 지식과 내재적 가치의 의미", 교육철학, 13, pp.81~109 (1995)
- 박철홍, "교육과 삶의 내적 관련에 비추어 본 교육의 내재적 가치: 경험중심 교육과정에서의 내재적 가치", 교육철학, 19, pp.1~19 (1998)
- 박철홍, "역자서문 In: 아동과 교육과정 ‧ 경험과 교육", pp.1~15 (2002), 문음사
- 박철홍, "암기위주 교육의 극복을 위한 대안 탐색: 의미로서의 지식관과 교육적 의의", 교육철학, (22), pp.81~97 (2002), 한국교육철학회
- 박철홍, "탐구의 궁극적 대상으로서 ‘삶의 총체적 이상’:탐구의 원형으로서 부적 학습의 형이상학적 근거", 도덕교육연구, 16(1), pp.185~214 (2004), 한국도덕교육학회
- 박철홍, "교과의 경험화에 함의된 교육내용의 성격: 질성적 사고에서 본 Dewey의 심리화의 재해석*", 교육철학연구, (31), pp.23~44 (2004), 한국교육철학학회
- 박철홍, "듀이의 경험론에서 본 지식의 총체성과 탐구의 성격 : 메논의 패러독스 해소방안", 교육철학연구, (38), pp.85~111 (2007), 한국교육철학학회
- 박철홍, "良知와 總知에서 본 지행합일 : 양명과 듀이의 만남", 도덕교육연구, 18(1), pp.205~240 (2006), 한국도덕교육학회
- 박철홍, "교육활동 속에서 형성되는 목적의 교육적 의미", 교육철학연구, (34), pp.105~122 (2005), 한국교육철학학회
- 서명석, "전통 心學으로 바라본 근대적 교수-학습의 한계: 서양 교수-학습과 동양 心學의 비교", 비교교육연구, 10(1), pp.61~84 (2000)
- 오욱환, "한국사회의 교육열:기원과 심화" (2000), 교육교학사
- 이철호, "한국사회 교육신화 비판" (2007), 메이데이
- 이홍우, "증보 교육의 목적과 난점" (1996), 교육과학사
- 이홍우, "증보 지식의 구조와 교과" (2006), 교육과학사
- 정범모, "교육난국의 해부" (1991), 나남
- 정순우, "공부의 발견" (2007), 현암사
- 최재목, "내 마음이 등불이다:왕양명의 삶과 사상" (2003), 이학사
- Alexander, T. M., "John Dewey's theory of art, experience, and nature: the horizon of feeling" (1987), State University of New York Press
- Dewey, J., "Democracy and education" (1916), Macmillan
- Dewey, J., "Creative intelligence In: Creative intelligence: essays in the pragmatic attitude" (1917), Henry Holt and Co.
- Dewey, J., "Reconstruction in philosophy" (1920), Beacon Press
- Dewey, J., "Experience and nature" (1929), Dover Publications, Inc.
- Dewey, J., "Philosophy and civilization" (1931), Capricorn Books
- Dewey, J., "A common faith" (1934), Yale University Press
- Dewey, J., "Experience and education" (1938), Carpricorn Books
- Dewey, J., "Logic:the theory of inquiry" (1938), Henry Holt and Co.
- Matrana, H. R., "Der Baum der Erkenntnis In: The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding" (1998), Shambhala Publications Inc., U. S.
