‘군사부일체’의 교육적 의미
Educational Implications of the Doctrine of King-Master-Father Trinity
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The doctrine of king-master-father trinity was accepted as a major educational norm in traditional education. It is ordinarily mentioned as an meaningful phrase also in contemporary educational context. The reason seems that its educational significance passes through both traditional and contemporary education. The aim of this study is to clarify the meaning of this doctrine and to derive its educational implications in contemporary educational context. The general meaning of this doctrine is that as a king, a master and a father's benefit are the same, they must be served equally. In this study, its meaning is attempted to be interpreted in two ways, the view of identity and of singularity, with relevance to education. The view of identity corresponds to the general meaning of the doctrine. It means that a king, a master, and a father are in the same status respectively and stresses 'the respect and gratitude for a master'. Meanwhile, the view of singularity broadens the domain of its general meaning. It means that they are in one body and emphasizes their diversity and integrity in education.
Abstract
The doctrine of king-master-father trinity was accepted as a major educational norm in traditional education. It is ordinarily mentioned as an meaningful phrase also in contemporary educational context. The reason seems that its educational significance passes through both traditional and contemporary education. The aim of this study is to clarify the meaning of this doctrine and to derive its educational implications in contemporary educational context. The general meaning of this doctrine is that as a king, a master and a father's benefit are the same, they must be served equally. In this study, its meaning is attempted to be interpreted in two ways, the view of identity and of singularity, with relevance to education. The view of identity corresponds to the general meaning of the doctrine. It means that a king, a master, and a father are in the same status respectively and stresses 'the respect and gratitude for a master'. Meanwhile, the view of singularity broadens the domain of its general meaning. It means that they are in one body and emphasizes their diversity and integrity in education.
참고문헌 (11)
- 강선보, "부버의 교사관과 유학의 교사관 비교연구", 한국교육, 28(2), pp.113~136 (2001), 한국교육개발원
- 김석준, "조선후기정치사상사연구-국가재조론의 대두와 전개-" (2003), 지식산업사
- 김종석, "퇴계학의 이해" (2001), 일송미디어
- 김태오, "퇴계의 삶에서 본 교사상", 교육철학, (22), pp.61~79 (2002), 한국교육철학회
- 박현모, "정조의 군사론 비판 -초계문신제와 문체반정을 중심으로", 한국실학연구, 2, pp.143~172 (2000), 한국실학학회
- 윤무학, "先秦 儒家의 五倫과 父子 倫理", 동양철학연구, 47(47), pp.247~278 (2006), 동양철학연구회
- 윤무학, "先秦 儒家의 君臣倫理와 “忠” 觀念", 동양철학연구, 48(48), pp.251~279 (2006), 동양철학연구회
- 이근호, "영조대 군사론의 정치적 의의", 북악사론, 10, pp.235~258 (2003), 북악사학회
- 이상식, "조선 肅宗代 君師父一體論의 전개와 왕권강화", 韓國史學報, 20(20), pp.165~192 (2005), 고려사학회
- 임수무, "효 윤리의 형성과 철학적 근거", 동양철학연구, 29, pp.293~312 (2002), 동양철학연구회
- 정만조, "조선 현종조의 사의,공의 논쟁", 한국학논총, 14, pp.65~89 (1991), 국민대학교 한국학연구소
