본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

어린이철학교육의 내러티브적 이해

A Study on Narrative Understanding of Philosophy Education for Children

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study aims to provide a clue that solves the problem of the 'philosophy education for children'. The possibility of the 'philosophy education for children' has been discussed throughout history. It began in earnest in the late 20th century, especially 'Lipman' in the U.S. and IAPC. 'Philosophy education for children' took shape the ideas, of 'philosophy for children' and 'philosophy with children'. Since then, it has come into wide use all over the world. However, there are some problems that are insufficient of critical and reflective researches; theories disconnected from educational practice, the lack of support by educational authorities and the deficiency of talented teachers. Because of these factors, 'philosophy education for children' is having a 1hard time to sustain growth and practical activity. These are the limits of 'paradigmatic thought' which comes from Bruner's idea. The limits will be able to solve through interaction between theories and practices in the sense of hermeneutics, and process that works to practical reasoning. As the process for better practice of 'philosophy education for children', I want you to approach 'narrative thought' on it. There are already enough underlying narratives in 'philosophy education for children', this narrative stated does not only use the story from a textbook or the skill for teaching, but also includes the narrative form in 'philosophy education for children'. The overall direction of research about 'philosophy education for children' should be changed from analysis to interpretation. Addedly stories have to use the thing as a means of transforming thought and action for practical reasoning and practice of 'philosophy education for children'. I wish, then, to place the philosophical discourse about 'philosophy education for children' in a more narrative form so that practices are brought out in greater detail.

Abstract

This study aims to provide a clue that solves the problem of the 'philosophy education for children'. The possibility of the 'philosophy education for children' has been discussed throughout history. It began in earnest in the late 20th century, especially 'Lipman' in the U.S. and IAPC. 'Philosophy education for children' took shape the ideas, of 'philosophy for children' and 'philosophy with children'. Since then, it has come into wide use all over the world. However, there are some problems that are insufficient of critical and reflective researches; theories disconnected from educational practice, the lack of support by educational authorities and the deficiency of talented teachers. Because of these factors, 'philosophy education for children' is having a 1hard time to sustain growth and practical activity. These are the limits of 'paradigmatic thought' which comes from Bruner's idea. The limits will be able to solve through interaction between theories and practices in the sense of hermeneutics, and process that works to practical reasoning. As the process for better practice of 'philosophy education for children', I want you to approach 'narrative thought' on it. There are already enough underlying narratives in 'philosophy education for children', this narrative stated does not only use the story from a textbook or the skill for teaching, but also includes the narrative form in 'philosophy education for children'. The overall direction of research about 'philosophy education for children' should be changed from analysis to interpretation. Addedly stories have to use the thing as a means of transforming thought and action for practical reasoning and practice of 'philosophy education for children'. I wish, then, to place the philosophical discourse about 'philosophy education for children' in a more narrative form so that practices are brought out in greater detail.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 강기수, "지식기반사회 교육 패러다임으로서의 어린이철학교육 탐색", 교육사상연구, 22(1), pp.21~44 (2008), 한국교육사상연구회
  2. 강기수, "한국에서의 ‘어린이철학교육’ 수용과정과 그 성격에 관한 연구", 교육사상연구, 23(3), pp.1~26 (2009), 한국교육사상연구회
  3. 강현석, "Polkinghorne" (2009), 학지사
  4. 김회용, "한국 어린이 철학교육의 발전 방안 모색", 교육사상연구, 22(3), pp.21~41 (2008), 한국교육사상연구회
  5. 박민정, "내러티브란 무엇인가?: 이야기 만들기, 의미구성, 커뮤니케이션의 해석학적 순환", 아시아교육연구, 7(4), pp.27~47 (2006), 교육연구소
  6. 박승억, "어린이와 함께 철학하기" (2000), 지리소
  7. 박찬영, "어린이철학, 도덕교육에 대한 또 다른 목소리" (2008), 한국학술정보(주)
  8. 서울교육대학철학연구동문회, "어린이를 위한 철학교육" (1980), 서광사
  9. 서울교육대학철학연구동문회, "함께하는 철학" (1980), 서광사
  10. 소경희, "내러티브 탐구" (2006), 교육과학사
  11. 양은주, "서사(narrative)의 본질과 초등교육적 의미", 교육사상연구, 24(3), pp.191~219 (2010), 한국교육사상연구회
  12. 이흔정, "Bruner의 내러티브 사고양식과 교육", 교육문제연구, (20), pp.73~91 (2004), 교육문제연구소
  13. 최예정, "스토리텔링과 내러티브" (2005), 글누림
  14. 한승희, "내러티브 사고양식의 교육적 의미", 敎育課程硏究, 15(1), pp.400~423 (1997)
  15. Bruner, J. S., "Actual minds, possible worlds" (1986), Harvard University Press
  16. Hunter McEwan, "Narrative in Teaching, Learning, and Research" (1995), Teachers college, Columbia University
  17. Polkinghorne, Donald. E., "Narrative knowing and the human science" (1988), State University of New York Press
  18. Rankin, J., "What is narrative: Ricoeur, Bakhtin, and Process Approaches", Concrescence: the Australasian Journal of Toronto Press Thought, 3, pp.1~12 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)