CMC 활용 글쓰기 환경과 면대면 글쓰기 환경에서의 동료 피드백 비교
A Comparison of Peer Feedback in CMC and FFC Contexts
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined 5th grade primary school students’ peer feedback exchange patterns in two different contexts: computer-mediated communication (CMC) and face-to-face communication (FFC). The students were given 20 minutes to exchange peer feedback after they completed 20 minutes of in-class writing on chosen topics. One group of students (n=24) used an electronic bulletin board to post their feedback whereas the other group wrote their feedback on the printed copies of their classmates’ writing. From the comparison of the feedback posted by the students, the study found that the students in the CMC context exchanged more feedback than those in the FFC context. In addition, the feedback posted in the CMC context were more diverse and more specifically related to language form and content. In contrast, the feedback the students exchanged in the FFC context was mostly compliments. These students were also found to simply repeat what others had written. Other findings of the study indicated that the students in the CMC context were more appreciative of peer feedback and displayed more positive affect, such as lowered anxiety and increased confidence.
Abstract
This study examined 5th grade primary school students’ peer feedback exchange patterns in two different contexts: computer-mediated communication (CMC) and face-to-face communication (FFC). The students were given 20 minutes to exchange peer feedback after they completed 20 minutes of in-class writing on chosen topics. One group of students (n=24) used an electronic bulletin board to post their feedback whereas the other group wrote their feedback on the printed copies of their classmates’ writing. From the comparison of the feedback posted by the students, the study found that the students in the CMC context exchanged more feedback than those in the FFC context. In addition, the feedback posted in the CMC context were more diverse and more specifically related to language form and content. In contrast, the feedback the students exchanged in the FFC context was mostly compliments. These students were also found to simply repeat what others had written. Other findings of the study indicated that the students in the CMC context were more appreciative of peer feedback and displayed more positive affect, such as lowered anxiety and increased confidence.
참고문헌 (47)
- . 서울: 대한교과서 주식회사, "2008", ~
- 김성연, "음성 언어 기반 CMC의 교육적 효과에 관한 연구", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 11(1), pp.85~102 (2008), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
- 김영서, "컴퓨터 중재학습과 영작에 대한 연구", 영어교육연구, 14(2), pp.253~276 (2002), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- 김정렬, "21C 영어교육" (2000), 홍릉과학출판사
- 송미정, "문자 피드백의 유형과 영작문 실력 향상 간의 관계", 영어교육, 53(2), pp.135~155 (1998)
- 송주현, "한국 대학 영어 학습자를 위한 과정 중심 쓰기에서 동료 피드백 교환 매체로서의 전자게시판 활용에 관한 현장 연구", 석사, pp.2004
- 이완기, "초등영어교육론" (2007), 문진미디어
- 이정원, "과정중심 피드백이 영어 쓰기능력 향상에 미치는 영향", 영어교육, 56(2), pp.265~285 (2001)
- 정양수, "인터넷을 활용한 영어 쓰기 학습의 효과와 효율적인 교수설계에 관한 연구", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 5(2), pp.130~155 (2002), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
- 정양수, "CMC 기반의 영어학습에서 과제형태에 따른 상호작용의 유형에 관한 연구", 영어학연구, 27(27), pp.69~91 (2009), 한국영어학학회
- 정양수, "CMC 기반의 상호작용적 영어작문 수업 모형 개발", 영어학연구, 16(2), pp.27~54 (2010), 한국영어학학회
- 최연희, "영어 쓰기 교육론, In 영어과교육론 2: 교과지도법", pp.97~187 (2004), 한국문화사
- 한명숙, "초등영어 쓰기에서 동료수정과 교사수정의 효과 비교 연구", 석사, pp.2002
- Brief, K., "Peer tutoring and the conversation of mankind", College English, 4, pp.635~653 (1984)
- Butler, J. F., "Remedial writers : The teacher’s job as corrector of papers", College Composition and Communication, 31, pp.270~277 (1980)
- Carbone, N., "Writing online : A student’s guide to the Internet and World Wide Web(3rd ed. )" (2000), Houghton Mifflin Company
- Carson, J. G., "ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, pp.113~131 (1998)
- 차윤정, "Effects of Online Peer Feedback Using CMC Instrument", 영어교육, 64(4), pp.1~24 (2009), 한국영어교육학회
- Jin-TaeChang, "The Use of CMC to Improve Communicative Competence", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 6(1), pp.18~41 (2003), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
- Chaudron, C., "The effects of feedback on student’s composition revisions", RELC Journal, 15, pp.1~14 (1984)
- Clifford, J., "Composing in stages : The effects of a collaborative pedagogy", Research in the Teaching of English, 15, pp.37~53 (1981)
- Crazden, C. B., "Classroom in discourse : The language teaching and learning" (1988), Heinemann
- Ferris, D., "Responding to writing, In Exploring the dynamics of second language writing", pp.119~140 (2003), Cambridge University Press
- "What elementary teachers need to know about language" (2000)[URL]
- Flynn, E., "Effects of peer critiquing and model analysis on the quality of biology student laboratory reports. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Washington DC", ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 234 403, ~ (1982)
- Horwitz, E. K., "Foreign language classroom anxiety", The Modern Language Journal, 70, pp.125~132 (1986)
- Keh, C., "Feedback in the writing process : A model and methods for implementation", ELT Journal, 44(4), pp.294~304 (1990)
- Sung-YeonKim, "Korean college students' reflections of English language learning via CMC and FFC", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 5(2), pp.9~28 (2002), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
- Sung-YeonKim, "A Combination of CMC and FFC: Its Effects on Korean Students’ Oral Proficiency and Attitudes", 영어교육, 58(1), pp.61~80 (2003), 한국영어교육학회
- Lee, S., "Teaching writing using a bulletin board on the Internet : A preliminary study", English Teaching, 55(3), pp.171~191 (2000)
- Leki, I., "Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes", CATESOL Journal, 3, pp.5~17 (1990)
- Mangelsdorf, K., "ESL student response stances in a peer review task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, pp.235~254 (1992)
- Mittan, R., "The peer review process: Harnessing students communicative power, In Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students", pp.207~219 (1989), Longman
- 배주경, "Collaborative Writing versus Individual Writing: Fluency, Accuracy, Complexity, and Essay Score", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 14(1), pp.121~148 (2011), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
- Eun-YoungPark, "Strategies in Negotiation of Meaning and Self-correction in CMC Interaction", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 6(2), pp.53~70 (2003), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
- Pfeiffer, J., "The effects of peer evaluation and personality on writing anxiety and writing performance in college freshmen", 박사, pp.1981
- Raimes, A., "What unskilled ESL students do when they write : A classroom study of composing", TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.229~258 (1985)
- Reid, J. M., "Teaching ESL writing" (1993), Prentice Hall Regents
- Scott, W. A., "Teaching English to children." (1990), Longman
- Sherry, L., "The nature and purpose of online discourse : A brief synthesis of current research as related to the WEB project", International Journal of Telecommunications, 7(1), pp.19~51 (2000)
- Silva, T., "L1 vs. L2 writing : ESL graduate student’s perceptions", TESOL Canada Journal, 10(1), pp.27~47 (1993)
- "English-as-a-second-language learning and collaboration in cyber space" (1997)[URL]
- Smeke, H. D., "Effects of the red pen", Foreign Language Annals, 3(17), pp.195~202 (1984)
- Tribble, C., "Writing" (1996), Oxford University Press
- Tuzi, F., "The impact of e-feedback on the revision of L2 writers in an academic writing course", Computers and Composition, 21, pp.217~235 (2004)
- Vygotsky, N., "Mind and society. The development of higher psychological processes." (1978), Harvard University Press
- Zamel, V., "Responding to student writing", TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.79~101 (1985)