본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison between the Effects of SCMC and SCMC with Peer Feedback on EFL Writing

2

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study compared the effects of two different types of synchronous computer mediated communication activity-synchronous computer mediated communication (SCMC) only and SCMC with peer feedback activity-on writing proficiency. The data was collected from 16 university students in an SCMC only and an SCMC with feedback group who took pre and post writing proficiency tests and conducted 8 weekly sessions on the same topics. The participants’ test results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test, and the results showed that the SCMC with feedback group improved overall writing proficiency nearly significantly. Using Tunits,the participants’ SCMC language analyzed in terms of accuracy, complexity, and fluency which showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, accuracy from the within group comparison revealed that the SCMC with feedback group improved significantly, while the SCMC only group did not. In terms of complexity and fluency, all the participants did not show any statistical change in both groups. The data analyzed herein provides an insight to the possibility that SCMC combined with feedback activity would enable learners in writing class to foster their accuracy by raising consciousness of grammatical forms through SCMC with feedback activity.

Abstract

This study compared the effects of two different types of synchronous computer mediated communication activity-synchronous computer mediated communication (SCMC) only and SCMC with peer feedback activity-on writing proficiency. The data was collected from 16 university students in an SCMC only and an SCMC with feedback group who took pre and post writing proficiency tests and conducted 8 weekly sessions on the same topics. The participants’ test results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test, and the results showed that the SCMC with feedback group improved overall writing proficiency nearly significantly. Using Tunits,the participants’ SCMC language analyzed in terms of accuracy, complexity, and fluency which showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, accuracy from the within group comparison revealed that the SCMC with feedback group improved significantly, while the SCMC only group did not. In terms of complexity and fluency, all the participants did not show any statistical change in both groups. The data analyzed herein provides an insight to the possibility that SCMC combined with feedback activity would enable learners in writing class to foster their accuracy by raising consciousness of grammatical forms through SCMC with feedback activity.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Abrams,Z, "The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German", The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), pp.157~167 (2003)
  2. Beach, R, "Early adolescents’ use of computer-mediated communication in writing and reading in Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a posttypographic world", pp.93~112 (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  3. Beauvois,M, "Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion", Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), pp.455~464 (1992)
  4. 차윤정, "A study of peer feedback patterns in CMC modes on Korean EFL students", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 10(1), pp.9~35 (2007), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
  5. Chapelle,C, "CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms", Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), pp.19~43 (1997)
  6. Chaudron,C, "The effects of feedback on students’ composition revision", RELC Journal, 15, pp.1~16 (1984)
  7. Chun,D, "Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence", System, 22, pp.17~31 (1994)
  8. Cooper, M, "Computer conferences and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse", College English, 52(8), pp.847~869 (1990)
  9. Datesman, M, "American ways (3rd Ed.)" (2005), Pearson Education
  10. Davis, B, "Writing into change: Style shifting in asynchronous electronic discourse in Networkbased language teaching: Concepts and practice", pp.121~150 (2000), Cambridge University Press
  11. Donato,R, "Collective scaffolding in second language learning in Vygotskian approaches to second language research", pp.33~56 (1994), Ablex Publishing
  12. Doughty, C, "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  13. Ellis,N, "Implicit and explicit learning of languages" (1994), Academic Press London
  14. Ferris, D, "The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), pp.1~10 (1996)
  15. Ferris, D, "Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice" (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  16. Ferris, D, "Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), pp.161~184 (2001)
  17. Jones, R. H, "Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, pp.1~23 (2006)
  18. 한종임, "대학교 영어학습자의 문자채팅영어의 정확성 및 형태초점 상호작용에 관한 사례연구", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 8(2), pp.262~287 (2005), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
  19. Hyland,K, "Teaching and researching writing" (2002), Pearson Education
  20. Hunt,K, "Grammatical structures written at three grade levels" (1965), The National Council of Teachers of English
  21. Kaplan,N, "Ideology, technology, and the future of writing instruction in Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies", pp.11~42 (1991), NCTE
  22. Kelm,O.R, "The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report", Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), pp.441~454 (1992)
  23. Kern,R, "Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production", The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), pp.457~476 (1995)
  24. Kern, R, "Introduction: Theory and practice of networkbased language teaching in Networkbased language teaching: Concepts and practice", pp.119~ (2000), Cambridge University Press
  25. Lai, C, "Noticing and textbased chat", Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), pp.102~120 (2006)
  26. Lee,L, "Synchronous online exchange: A study of modification device on nonnative discourse", System, 30, pp.275~288 (2002)
  27. Lee,L, "interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the U.S", Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), pp.83~100 (2004)
  28. Leki, I, "Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes", CATESOL Journal, 3(1), pp.5~19 (1990)
  29. Levy, M, "A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audio-conferencing in foreign language learning", Language Learning, 8(2), pp.50~69 (2004)
  30. Liang,M, "Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revisionrelated discourse", Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), pp.45~64 (2010)
  31. Liu, J, "Peer response in second language writing classroom" (2002), University of Michigan Press
  32. Long, M, "Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition", TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), pp.207~228 (1985)
  33. Long, M. H, "Focus on form: Theory, research and practice in Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.15~41 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  34. Mabrito,M, "Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response: Conversations of high-and low-apprehensive writers", Written Communication, 8(4), pp.509~532 (1991)
  35. Mendonca, C. O, "Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), pp.745~769 (1994)
  36. Mittan,R, "The peer response process: Harnessing student communicative power in Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students", pp.207~219 (1989), Longman
  37. Pellettieri, J, "Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in Networkbased language teaching: Concepts and practice", pp.59~86 (2000), Cambridge University Press
  38. Raimes,A, "Exploring through writing: A process approach to ESL composition" (1987), St. Martin’s Press
  39. Schultz,J, "Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum in Networkbased language teaching: Concepts and practice", pp.121~150 (2000), Cambridge University Press
  40. 심영숙, "대학교 영어학습자의 컴퓨터 채팅에 나타난 오류분석", 영어학연구, 22(22), pp.71~91 (2006), 한국영어학학회
  41. Skehan, P, "The influence of planning and posttask activities on accuracy and complexity in taskbased learning", Language Teaching Research, 1(3), pp.16~33 (1997)
  42. Slatin,J, "The computer writing and research lab: A brief institutional history in Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom", pp.19~38 (1998), Labyrinth Publications
  43. Sotillo, S, "Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication", Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), pp.82~119 (2000)
  44. Sullivan,N, "Teaching writing on a computer network", TESOL Journal, 3(1), pp.34~35 (1993)
  45. Sullivan, N., "A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom", System, 24(4), pp.491~501 (1996)
  46. Stanley,J, "Coaching student writer to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.217~233 (1992)
  47. Truscott,J, "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes", Language Learning, 46(2), pp.327~369 (1996)
  48. Truscott,J, "The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), pp.111~122 (1999)
  49. Tsui, A, "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, pp.147~170 (2000)
  50. Warschauer,M, "Comparing face to face and electronic communication in the second language classroom", CALICO Journal, 13, pp.7~25 (1996)
  51. Warschauer,M, "Computermediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice", The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), pp.470~481 (1997)
  52. Warschauer,M, "Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education" (1999), Erlbaum Associates
  53. Witbeck,M, "Peer correction procedures for intermediate and advanced ESL composition lessons", TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), pp.321~326 (1976)
  54. WolfeQuintero, K, "Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity" (1998), University of Hawaii Press
  55. Zhang,S, "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)