본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 속격 표지 ‘의’의 분포와 속격의 본질

The Distribution the Korean Genitive Case Marker '-uy' and the Nature of Genitive Case

이종근
한국생성문법학회|2015.02|생성문법연구 (Studies in Generative Grammar)|제25권 제1호|pp. 277-306|DOI 10.15860/sigg.25.1.201502.277

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

case markermodifier markercaseCaseCase markergenitive casenature of genitive Caseprenominal inflectioncase drop‘uy’
주제분류언어학

초록

It has recently been claimed that the so-called genitive case marker ‘uy’ in Korean is not a case marker, but a nominal modifier marker. According to Hong (2010) and Hong (2013), ‘uy’ is not a Case marker; it is a modifier marker, and according to An (2012), the marker ‘uy’ is not an indicator of Case-licensing, rather it instantiates an abstract prenominal inflection. Their claims are based on two observations; 1) that ‘uy’ is in an allomorphic relation with some other inflectional morpheme used for marking prenominal verbal and adjectival modifiers, and 2) that ‘uy’ can attach to elements which, under standard assumptions, do not require Case. The present work, maintaining what most other generative grammarians have assumed, argues that ‘uy’ is to be analyzed as a case marker. This argumentation is based on the broad definition of case which accommodates various data from many other languages around the world, and it is also based on influential positions of Case in current generative syntax (McFadden (2004) and Bobaljik (2008) among others) that morphological case and syntactic licensing can be separated. Consequently, contrary to Hong’s and An’s assumptions about Case, nominal phrases such as DPs can bear case even when they are not arguments.

Abstract

It has recently been claimed that the so-called genitive case marker ‘uy’ in Korean is not a case marker, but a nominal modifier marker. According to Hong (2010) and Hong (2013), ‘uy’ is not a Case marker; it is a modifier marker, and according to An (2012), the marker ‘uy’ is not an indicator of Case-licensing, rather it instantiates an abstract prenominal inflection. Their claims are based on two observations; 1) that ‘uy’ is in an allomorphic relation with some other inflectional morpheme used for marking prenominal verbal and adjectival modifiers, and 2) that ‘uy’ can attach to elements which, under standard assumptions, do not require Case. The present work, maintaining what most other generative grammarians have assumed, argues that ‘uy’ is to be analyzed as a case marker. This argumentation is based on the broad definition of case which accommodates various data from many other languages around the world, and it is also based on influential positions of Case in current generative syntax (McFadden (2004) and Bobaljik (2008) among others) that morphological case and syntactic licensing can be separated. Consequently, contrary to Hong’s and An’s assumptions about Case, nominal phrases such as DPs can bear case even when they are not arguments.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 김인균, "관형 명사구의 구조와 의미 관계", 國語學, 41, pp.197~223 (2003), 국어학회
  2. 목정수, "한국어문법론" (2003), 월인
  3. 박소영, "한국어 속격 ‘의’의 실현과 DP 가설", 생성문법연구, 24(3), pp.613~629 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
  4. 박정섭, "명사구에서의 논항 실현에 관한 고찰 - 불어와 한국어를 중심으로 -", 프랑스어문교육, 16, pp.223~248 (2003), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
  5. 박정섭, "속격 표지 ‘의’의 수의성에 대하여", 생성문법연구, 16(1), pp.3~18 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
  6. 이남순, "국어의 부정격과 격표지 생략" (1988), 탑출판사
  7. 안덕호, "최소주의적 관점에서의 소유격: 한국어를 중심으로", 언어, 37(3), pp.607~621 (2012), 한국언어학회
  8. 임홍빈, "존재 전제와 속격 표지{의}", 언어와 언어학, 7 (1981)
  9. 홍용철, "융합이론과 격조사의 분포", 생성문법연구, 4, pp.1~43 (1994)
  10. 홍용철, "한국어 명사 외곽 수식어들의 어순과 명사구 구조", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.27~50 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
  11. 홍용철, "소유격 표지 “의”의 분포와 본질", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.321~345 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
  12. 홍용철, "고유명사와 ‘의’의 의무적 출현: 박소영(2014)에의 응답", 한국생성문법학회 가을학술대회 발표 자료집 (2014)
  13. Abney, S. P., "English noun phrases in its sentential aspects", 박사, pp.1987
  14. Ahn, H-D, "In Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics", pp.1~15 (1988), Hanshin Publishing Co
  15. Alexiadou, "Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective" (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
  16. Baker, M. C., "Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
  17. Baker, M. C., "Of parameters and polysynthesis. The Polysynthesis Parameter" (1996), Oxford University Press
  18. Blake, B., "Case" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  19. Bobaljik, J., "Phi-Theory:Phi features across interfaces and modules", pp.295~328 (2008), Oxford University Press
  20. Bošković, Ž., "What will you have", DP or NP? In Proceedings of NELS 37 (2008)
  21. Bresnan, J., "Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.1~50 (1989)
  22. Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  23. Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of Language" (1986), Praeger
  24. Chomsky, N., "The View from Building 20" (1993), MIT Press
  25. Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  26. Chomsky, N., "Minimalist Inquiries. Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~156 (2000), MIT Press
  27. Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase", pp.1~52 (2001), A Life in Linguistics
  28. Chomsky, N., "Filters and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.425~504 (1977)
  29. Grimshaw, J., "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
  30. Hale, Kenneth, "A festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.308~344 (1973), Holt, Rinehart & Winston
  31. Jeong, Yongkil, "Comp-ko and Case markers", Studies in Generative Grammar, 9, pp.39~87 (1999)
  32. Kang, Young-se, "Korean Syntax and Universal Grammar", 박사, pp.1986
  33. Kim, Young-Joo, "The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Case: The Interaction between Lexical and Syntactic Levels of Representation", 박사, pp.1990
  34. Lasnik, H., "Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar" (1981), Scuola Normale Superiore
  35. Lee, J. K., "The Syntax and Pragmatics of Korean Case", 박사, pp.1994
  36. 이종근, "The Structure of Nominal Phrases in Korean and Functional Projections", 언어학, 16(3), pp.257~278 (2008), 대한언어학회
  37. Lin, J., "Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure", 박사, pp.2001
  38. Marantz, A, "Case and licensing", the Eighth Eastern States Conference in Linguistics, pp.234~253 (1991)
  39. Markman, V., "Case Theory: A Historical Overview", Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(9), pp.846~862 (2010)
  40. McFadden, T., "A position of morphological case in the derivation: a study of morphology-syntax interface", 박사, pp.2004
  41. Ndayiragije, J., "Configurations: essays on structure and interpretation", pp.267~292 (1996), Cascadilla Press
  42. Nichols, J, "Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar", Language, 62, pp.56~119 (1986)
  43. Öztürk, B., "Case, Referentiality and Phrase Structure" (2005), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  44. Pesetsky, D., "The earliness principle", 석사, pp.1989
  45. Poole, G., "Syntactic Theory" (2011), Palgrave Macmillan
  46. Rouveret, A., "Specifying Reference to the Subject", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.97~202 (1980)
  47. Sigurðsson, "The nominative puzzle and the low nominative hypothesis", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.289~308 (2006)
  48. Stowell, T., "Origins of Phrase Structure", 박사, pp.1981
  49. Tellier, C., "Underlying nominals and the projection principle", NELS 20 (1990)
  50. Vergnaud, J. R., "The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and English", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.595~652 (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

소유격 표지 “의”의 분포와 본질홍용철한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2013 · 제23권 제3호최소주의적 관점에서의 소유격: 한국어를 중심으로안덕호한국언어학회 · 언어2012 · 제37권 제3호속격 표지 ‘의’의 수의성에 대하여박정섭한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2006 · 제16권 제1호Genitive Case and Complex Spatial PPs in Korean최재훈한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2015 · 제25권 제3호한국어 속격 ‘의’의 실현과 DP 가설박소영한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2014 · 제24권 제3호명사구 내 보충어에의 격 표지 부재와 인접에 의한 가시성 조건 만족홍용철한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2015 · 제25권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

Agreement of a Point-of-Viewer and a Jussive Subject허세문, 서샛별pp. 1-34Subject Constraints and the Consciousness Projection김재은pp. 35-60Non-movement vs. Movement in Japanese Dative Case-marked Fragment임익희pp. 61-80“∼ㄹ/을 수(가) 있다”: 우리말 관형절이 있는 주격 복합명사구최준수pp. 81-108Is Criterial Freezing a Syntactic Illusion?정연진pp. 109-139
원문 보기