명사구 내 보충어에의 격 표지 부재와 인접에 의한 가시성 조건 만족
Absence of Case Marker in the Complement Position of the Noun Head and Satisfaction of Visibility Condition by Adjacency
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korean, there are two types of nominals dependent on the noun head: the nominals combined with the so-called genetive case marker uy and the nominals without this marker. We assume, following Hong (2010, 2013) and An (2012), that uy is not a case marker, but a modifier marker. So a nominal with uy is not an argument, but a modifier. On the other hand, we claim that the nominals of the other type, nominals without uy, are complement arguments; they are noun phrases; they have only a particular Θ-role, theme if their Θ-assigner is an event noun; they always appear adjacent to the noun head on which they depend. However, we have to say that the nominals without uy don’t receive any Case because they don’t have any morphological case on them. Then, the question arises as to how they come to satisfy the Visibility Condition, which requires that arguments be Case-assigned for Θ-marking. To answer this question, we propose that the Visibility Condition should be revised so that it can be satisfied not only by Case assignment but also by adjacency. Recall that the nominals without uy always appear adjacent to their Θ-marker. Therefore, these Caseless arguments can satisfy the Visibility Condition by means of adjacency. We also show that this revised Visibility Condition correctly predicts absence of arguments in the Spec position of the noun head, and obligatory presence of a case marker on sentential subjects, on ECMed arguments, and on subjects of resultative small clauses.
Abstract
In Korean, there are two types of nominals dependent on the noun head: the nominals combined with the so-called genetive case marker uy and the nominals without this marker. We assume, following Hong (2010, 2013) and An (2012), that uy is not a case marker, but a modifier marker. So a nominal with uy is not an argument, but a modifier. On the other hand, we claim that the nominals of the other type, nominals without uy, are complement arguments; they are noun phrases; they have only a particular Θ-role, theme if their Θ-assigner is an event noun; they always appear adjacent to the noun head on which they depend. However, we have to say that the nominals without uy don’t receive any Case because they don’t have any morphological case on them. Then, the question arises as to how they come to satisfy the Visibility Condition, which requires that arguments be Case-assigned for Θ-marking. To answer this question, we propose that the Visibility Condition should be revised so that it can be satisfied not only by Case assignment but also by adjacency. Recall that the nominals without uy always appear adjacent to their Θ-marker. Therefore, these Caseless arguments can satisfy the Visibility Condition by means of adjacency. We also show that this revised Visibility Condition correctly predicts absence of arguments in the Spec position of the noun head, and obligatory presence of a case marker on sentential subjects, on ECMed arguments, and on subjects of resultative small clauses.
참고문헌 (22)
- 남기심, "표준 국어문법론" (1993), 탑출판사
- 박정섭, "명사구에서의 논항 실현에 관한 고찰 - 불어와 한국어를 중심으로 -", 프랑스어문교육, 16, pp.223~248 (2003), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 박정섭, "속격 표지 ‘의’의 수의성에 대하여", 생성문법연구, 16(1), pp.3~18 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- 안덕호, "최소주의적 관점에서의 소유격: 한국어를 중심으로", 언어, 37(3), pp.607~621 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 임홍빈, "존재전제와 속격 표지 ‘의’", 국어의 심층, 2, pp.283~306 (1998), 태학사
- 홍용철, "융합이론과 격조사 분포", 생성문법연구, 4, pp.1~43 (1994)
- 홍용철, "한국어의 격조사 탈락과 격조사 부재", 프랑스어문교육, (18), pp.295~314 (2004), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 홍용철, "한국어의 명사 확장범주", 언어, 31(4), pp.657~684 (2006), 한국언어학회
- 홍용철, "한국어의 후치 요소와 명사 확장 범주", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.743~768 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "한국어 명사 외곽 수식어들의 어순과 명사구 구조", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.27~50 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "지시사구", 프랑스어문교육, (35), pp.229~257 (2010), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 홍용철, "소유격 표지 “의”의 분포와 본질", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.321~345 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "한국어에서의 예외격(ECM) 구문과 자동 주격 분석", 생성문법연구, 24(3), pp.659~686 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
- Ahn, H. -D., "Morphosyntax in Generative Grammar", pp.1~21 (1996), Hankuk Publishing Co
- Ahn, H. -D., "Linguistic Investigation: In honor of In-Seok Yang", pp.1~16 (1999), Hankuk Publishing Co
- Baker, M., "Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use" (1986), Praeger
- Dikken, Marcel Den, "Linguisitc Monograph 47" (2006), MIT Press
- Di Sciullo,A. M., "Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 14" (1987)
- Grimshaw, J., "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
- 고희정, "On the Typology of Small Clauses: Null Subject and Mode of Merge in Resultatives", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.347~375 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]