마하티르와 김대중의 동아시아지역협력 구상 비교 연구
A Comparative Study of Visions for East Asian Regional Cooperation of Mahathir and Kim Dae-Jung
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyses two different visions of regionalism: one by Mahathir Mohamad, former Malaysian Prime Minister and the other one by Kim Dae-Jung, former Korean President. These two regional leaders had unrivaled impacts on the development of East Asian regionalism. Studies on the vision of regional leaders, however, is hard to be found and thus, this study is an experimental attempt to fill such a gap. Kim Dae-Jung and Mahathir share common geographical boundary of East Asia. More importantly, East Asian regional cooperation was to tackle national and regional crises for both Mahathir and Kim. Mahathir, in early 1990s, had to ensure Malaysian and regional economic growth, facing the rising regionalism in other regions and protectionism. Similarly, Kim had to cope with Asian Financial Crisis domestically and East Asian regional cooperation was a tool to rekindle domestic and regional economic growth after the crisis. On the other hand, Mahathir's vision for regional cooperation was heavily influenced by his long-standing anti-Western nationalism, thus resulting in a closed and exclusive regional cooperation which only benefits East Asian people and countries. On the contrary, Kim has long been a strong advocate of universal values of democracy against military regime in Korea. Thus, Kim's belief in universalism brought about a vision of open regional cooperation, based on universal values, that would do a good not only for East Asia but also for whole human being.
Abstract
This study analyses two different visions of regionalism: one by Mahathir Mohamad, former Malaysian Prime Minister and the other one by Kim Dae-Jung, former Korean President. These two regional leaders had unrivaled impacts on the development of East Asian regionalism. Studies on the vision of regional leaders, however, is hard to be found and thus, this study is an experimental attempt to fill such a gap. Kim Dae-Jung and Mahathir share common geographical boundary of East Asia. More importantly, East Asian regional cooperation was to tackle national and regional crises for both Mahathir and Kim. Mahathir, in early 1990s, had to ensure Malaysian and regional economic growth, facing the rising regionalism in other regions and protectionism. Similarly, Kim had to cope with Asian Financial Crisis domestically and East Asian regional cooperation was a tool to rekindle domestic and regional economic growth after the crisis. On the other hand, Mahathir's vision for regional cooperation was heavily influenced by his long-standing anti-Western nationalism, thus resulting in a closed and exclusive regional cooperation which only benefits East Asian people and countries. On the contrary, Kim has long been a strong advocate of universal values of democracy against military regime in Korea. Thus, Kim's belief in universalism brought about a vision of open regional cooperation, based on universal values, that would do a good not only for East Asia but also for whole human being.
참고문헌 (37)
- "대통령 취임 경축 만찬 연설" (1998), 서울
- "베트남 방문 및 아세안 정상회의 참석 귀국 기자회견" (1998), 서울
- "아세안+3 정상회의 연설" (1999), 마닐라, 필리핀
- "아세안+3 정상회의 연설" (2001), 반다르 세리 베가완 브루나이
- "마하티르 말레이시아 총리를 위한 만찬 연설" (2002), 서울
- "제2차 동아시아포럼(EAF) 총회 연설문" (2004), 쿠알라룸푸르, 말레이시아
- "제1차 동아시아 정상회의(EAS) 개최 전망 및 과제" (2005), 서울: 외교안보연구원
- "동아시아의 지역질서 제국을 넘어 공동체로" (2005), 서울 창비
- "The Imagined Community of East Asia" (2006), Seoul. Korea
- "Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Authority" (1995), Stanford: Stanford University Press
- "Asia's Post-Crisis Regionalism: Bringing the State Back in, Keeping the (United) States Out", 9(2), pp.230~256 (2002)
- "Final Report of the East Asia Study Group" (2002), Phnom Pehn, Cambodia
- "Towards An East Asian Community - Region of Peace , Prosperity and Progress" (2001)
- "Between Regionalism and Regionalization: Policy Networks and the Nascent East Asian Institutional Identity", pp.195~215 (2005), Ithaca: Cornell University Press
- "Conclusion The New Regionalism", pp.247~264 (1996), Houndsmill:McMillan Press
- "ASEAN's Relations with Major External Powers", 22(2), pp.258~278 (2000)
- "East Asian Ideas of Regionalism: a Normative Critique", 58(1), pp.105~125 (2004)
- "The Asian Economic Crisis: A Study in the Politics of Resentment", 3(3) (1998)
- "International Politics: A Framework for Analysis" (1995), Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
- "IMF Staff Country Report", (00, pp.130) (2000), ~[DOI]
- "Nationalism, Capitalism and Asian Values", pp.51~73 (2002), Richmond: Curzon Press
- "East Asian Regionalism: A Look at the ASEAN+Three Framework", 16(1) (2002)
- "Is Culture Destiny? The Myth of Asia's Anti-Democratic Values" (1994)
- "The Voice of Asia: Two Leaders Discuss the Coming Century" (1995), Tokyo: Kodansha International
- "Good Return of Growth and Stability Speech delivered at the 24th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting" (1991)
- "ASEAN in the 1990s and Beyond The Case for Expanded ASEAN-based Regional Cooperation a speech delivered at The Council of Foreign Relations", pp.26~ (1991)
- "Speech at the Meeting of ASEAN Economic Ministers", pp.7~ (1991)
- "Speech at Senator House" (1995), Cambridge University
- "Let Asian Build Their Own Future Regionalism", 1(1), pp.13~15 (2006)
- "Domestic Politics and Regionalism: The ASEAN Free Trade Area" (2003), London: Routledge
- "East Asia Summit Doomed" (2005), Business Times (Singapore)
- "ASEAN and Non-Interference: Principle Maintained", 22(1), pp.60~89 (2000)
- "The NICs and Competing Strategies of East Asian Regionalism", pp.207~245 (1996), Houndsmill:McMillan Press
- "ASEAN Plus 3: Challenges and Cautions about a New Regionalism", pp.99~117 (2002), Kuala Lumpur: ISIS Malaysia
- "Constructing an 'East Asian' Concept and Growing Regional Identity: From EAEC to ASEAN+3", 16(2), pp.251~277 (2003)
- "Asean leaders mull over grouping's future Time to rethink" (1991)
- "A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew" (1994)