『明心寶鑑』의 교육적 의의: 가다머의 ‘전통’ 관점과 도킨스의 ‘밈’ 가설을 중심으로
The Educational Significance of MyeongsimBogam: Focused on Gadamer’s Tradition and Dawkins’s Meme
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We are no longer speaking to tradition. Past education which civilization device of East Asia had been naturally taught has been completely replaced with modern education. And Chinese, which entirely contained its ideas, lost status to English. Now we are facing a tragedy of “civilized sorrow―pathos” and a tragedy which tradition may disappear in Korea. So using the MyeongsimBogam(『明心寶鑑』) text, I attempt to open the door which we can overcome this “civilized sorrow” and move forward. In fact, MyeongsimBogam is a ‘anthology’ or ‘potpourri’ including various or/and holistic social-organic-networks of Choseon; it covers not only a factor of the rewarding of virtue and the punishment of evil, but also the social bases which build public order and connect valuable customs, which needs to be made. Myeongsimbogam had been a textbook for children in the traditional Seodang of the Choseon Dynasty, now it can be used for even adult. With this, we can experience the text, MyeongsimBogam which is so characteristic of East tradition. Experiencing MyeongsimBogam and understanding it is ‘sharing’ the meaning of the text which tells us in terms of Gadamer’s way. In other words, to create new prospect, we should not simply restore or reproduce past history, but carefully absorb the meaning in the text passed down. It is finding the ‘text-ualities’ of MyeongsimBogam in there, in Dawkins’s way, including the Memes Set in it. Simultaneously ability to make a road to transmission and succession is necessary. Once we address to tradition first, tradition starts to speak to us. And each time, it will show us new voices of tradition. Beyond the time gap and discontinuity between tradition and modern society, MyeongsimBogam is still addressing to us.
Abstract
We are no longer speaking to tradition. Past education which civilization device of East Asia had been naturally taught has been completely replaced with modern education. And Chinese, which entirely contained its ideas, lost status to English. Now we are facing a tragedy of “civilized sorrow―pathos” and a tragedy which tradition may disappear in Korea. So using the MyeongsimBogam(『明心寶鑑』) text, I attempt to open the door which we can overcome this “civilized sorrow” and move forward. In fact, MyeongsimBogam is a ‘anthology’ or ‘potpourri’ including various or/and holistic social-organic-networks of Choseon; it covers not only a factor of the rewarding of virtue and the punishment of evil, but also the social bases which build public order and connect valuable customs, which needs to be made. Myeongsimbogam had been a textbook for children in the traditional Seodang of the Choseon Dynasty, now it can be used for even adult. With this, we can experience the text, MyeongsimBogam which is so characteristic of East tradition. Experiencing MyeongsimBogam and understanding it is ‘sharing’ the meaning of the text which tells us in terms of Gadamer’s way. In other words, to create new prospect, we should not simply restore or reproduce past history, but carefully absorb the meaning in the text passed down. It is finding the ‘text-ualities’ of MyeongsimBogam in there, in Dawkins’s way, including the Memes Set in it. Simultaneously ability to make a road to transmission and succession is necessary. Once we address to tradition first, tradition starts to speak to us. And each time, it will show us new voices of tradition. Beyond the time gap and discontinuity between tradition and modern society, MyeongsimBogam is still addressing to us.
참고문헌 (33)
- "논어", ~
- "대지도론", ~
- "맹자", ~
- "명심보감", ~
- "주역", ~
- "중용", ~
- 고두현, "한국 문화유전자 지도" (2014), 스토리하우스
- 곽철환, "불교의 모든 것" (2014), B잎새
- 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 도덕 5 교사용 지도서" (2011), 지학사
- 교육부, "도덕 3 교사용 지도서" (2014), 천재교육
- 교육부, "초등학교 도덕 5" (2014), 천재교육
- 김종운, "조선조 몽학 교재 연구", 박사, 한문교육, pp.2001
- 단국대학교 동양학연구소, "훈몽자회" (2006), 단국대학교 출판부
- 朴暻衍, "朝鮮時代 初學敎材로서의 「明心寶鑑」 硏究", 석사, 교육학, pp.1999
- 성백효, "현토완역 명심보감" (2012), 전통문화연구회
- 성해준, "동아시아 『명심보감』 연구" (2012), 도서출판 문
- 이길우, "진리와 방법OE: 철학적 해석학의 기본 특징들" (2012), 문학동네
- 임홍배, "김남주 시전집" (2014), 창비
- 임홍배, "진리와 방법 : 철학적 해석학의 기본 특징들" (2012), 문학동네
- 丁淳佑, "18世紀 書堂 硏究", 박사, 교육학, pp.1986
- 정천구, "『명심보감』의 사상적 특성 연구", 동양한문학연구, 29(29), pp.361~390 (2009), 동양한문학회
- 정천구, "밝은 마음을 비추는 보배로운 거울" (2010), 지식산업사
- 최낙원, "보르헤스와 세르반떼스: 보르헤스의 「양피지성 Palimpsesto」을 중심으로", 현대시사상, 14, pp.118~129 (1993)
- 최홍렬, "직접 한옥 짓고 삽니다⋯서촌의 ‘파 교수’", 조선일보. 제29046호. 2014년 5월 24-25일자, 1~2 (2014)
- 한글학회, "우리말 큰사전 4: 옛말과 이두" (1992), 어문각
- 한재훈, "서당공부, 오래된 인문학의 길" (2014), 갈라파고스
- 황지우, "게 눈 속의 연꽃" (2012), 문학과지성사
- 휴 J. 실버만, "텍스트성·철학·예술: 해석학과 해체주의 사이" (2009), 효명출판
- Dawkins, R., "이기적 유전자" (2013), 을유문화사
- Glen-Doepel, W., "Truth and method" (1979), Sheed and Ward
- Hull, R. F. C., "Psychology and religion: west and east" (1973), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Kneller, G. F., "Introduction to the philosophy of education" (1971), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
- Weinsheimer, J., "Truth and method" (2013), Bloomsbury
