본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

복잡적응시스템으로서 학교의 존재론 및 인식론

The Ontology and Epistemology of School as Complex Adaptive System

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study is about ontology and epistemology of learning system of school as complex adaptive system. Since early 20th century there are cognitions that many social or natural phenomena are seldom explained by linear causal relation. These cognitions have influenced educational researches and practices. So some peoples look school system as complex system. Research and practice around complexity education is short and humble. But the philosophy underlied in the complexity education is long and deep. The philosophy or discourse of complexity education is interobjectivity. In the ontological perspective of interobjectivity, the reality is composed of the virtual and the actual. There are virtual relationship among numerous agents compose the school as a complex adaptive system. And actual school or learning phenomena are the emergent system from the virtual. By the epistemological perspective of interobjectivity the world is brought forth by interaction of agents. Here the agents are also transformed in the process of bringing forth. And they bring forth another world different from the past. And agents make another world each other.

Abstract

This study is about ontology and epistemology of learning system of school as complex adaptive system. Since early 20th century there are cognitions that many social or natural phenomena are seldom explained by linear causal relation. These cognitions have influenced educational researches and practices. So some peoples look school system as complex system. Research and practice around complexity education is short and humble. But the philosophy underlied in the complexity education is long and deep. The philosophy or discourse of complexity education is interobjectivity. In the ontological perspective of interobjectivity, the reality is composed of the virtual and the actual. There are virtual relationship among numerous agents compose the school as a complex adaptive system. And actual school or learning phenomena are the emergent system from the virtual. By the epistemological perspective of interobjectivity the world is brought forth by interaction of agents. Here the agents are also transformed in the process of bringing forth. And they bring forth another world different from the past. And agents make another world each other.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 니체, "짜라투스트라는 이렇게 말했다" (1982), 삼성출판사
  2. 들뢰즈, "의미의 논리" (1999), 도서출판 한길사
  3. 이정우, "강도의 과학과 잠재성의 철학" (2009), 그린비
  4. 최호영, "앎의 나무" (2007), 갈무리
  5. 브렌트 데이비스, "구성주의를 넘어선 복잡성 교육과 생태주의 교육의 계보학" (2014), 씨아이알
  6. 브렌트 데이비스, "혁신교육, 철학을 만나다" (2011), 도서출판 살림터
  7. 스티븐 J, "푸코와 교육-푸코를 통해 바라본근대교육의 계보학" (2007), 청계
  8. 스피노자, "에티카" (1999), 혜원출판사
  9. 움베르또 마뚜라나, "있음에서 함으로" (2006), 갈무리
  10. 윤병수, "복잡계 개론" (2005), 삼성경제연구소
  11. 이노우에 마사요시, "카오스와 복잡계의 과학" (2002), 한승
  12. 이진경, "노마디즘1" (2002), 휴머니스트
  13. 이진경, "노마디즘2" (2002), 휴머니스트
  14. 일리야 프리고진, "확실성의 종말" (1997), 사이언스북스
  15. 장은성, "복잡성의 과학" (1999), 전파과학사
  16. 정낙림, "주체의 계보학-니체의 주체개념 비판-", 철학연구, 98, pp.271~296 (2006), 대한철학회
  17. 정철민, "초복잡성 사회에서의 대학 이념 연구", 박사, 교육학과 교육철학전공, pp.2012
  18. 존 L 카스티, "복잡성 과학이란 무엇인가" (2000), 까치글방
  19. 질 들뢰즈, "천개의 고원" (2003), 새물결
  20. Barton, S, "Chaos, self-organization, and psychology", American Psychologist, (49), pp.5~14 (1994)
  21. Davis, Brent, "Invention of Teaching : a genealogy" (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  22. Davis, Brent., "Complicity : An Introduction and a Welcome", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), pp.1~7 (2004)
  23. Davis, B., "Understanding learning systems : Mathematics education and complexity science", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), pp.137~167 (2003)
  24. Davis, Brent., "Complexity Science and Educational Action Research : toward a pragmatics of transformation", Educational Action Research, 13(3), pp.453~466 (2005)
  25. Davis, Brent., "Complexity and Education" (2006), Routledge
  26. Deleuze, G, "Difference and Repetition" (1994), Columbia University Press
  27. Doll Jr., "Maturana Is Not a Contructivist. . . Nor is Piaget", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 5(1), pp.27~31 (2008)
  28. Eenvyk van, J. R, "Archetypes : the strange attractors of the psyche", Journal of Analytical Psychology, 36, pp.1~25 (1991)
  29. Fazio, Xavier., "Supporting Learning: An Examination of Two Teacher Development Collectives", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 6(2), pp.1~19 (2009)
  30. Fels, Lynn, "Complexity, Teacher Education and the Restless Jury : Pedagogical Moments of Performance", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), pp.73~98 (2004)
  31. Hallward, P, "Out of this world : Deleuze and the philosophy of creation" (2006), Verso
  32. Holland, John H, "Hidden Order : How Adaptation Builds Complexity" (1995), Helix Books
  33. J. R. Eenwyk, Evanston, "Archetypes : The Strange Attractors of the Psyche", Journal of Analytical Psychology, 36, pp.1~25 (1991)
  34. Kieren, Tom., "Brought Forth in Bringing Forth. The Inter Actions and Products of a Collective Learning System", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 6(2), pp.20~28 (2009)
  35. Kirshner, David., "Lev Vygotsky as Muse to Complex Learning", Teaching, 2009, pp.6(1), 45~55
  36. Maturana, Humberto R, "Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought:Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg", pp.27~63 (1978), Academic Press
  37. Mowat, Elizabeth., "Interpreting Embodied Mathematics Using Network Theory : Implications for Mathematics Education", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 7(1), pp.1~31 (2010)
  38. Nelson, Charles, "Building Blocks and Learning", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), pp.39~55 (2004)
  39. Osberg, D., "Complexity, Representation and the Epistemology of Schooling", In Proceedings of the 2003Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference, pp.83~99 (2003)
  40. Phelan, Anne, "Rationalism, Complexity Science and Curriculum : A Cautionary Tale", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), pp.9~17 (2004)
  41. Proulx, J, "Constructivism: A re-equilibration and clarification of the concepts, and some potential implications for teaching and pedagogy", Radical Pedagogy, 8(1) (2006)
  42. Proulx, J, "Some Differences between Maturana and Varela's Theory of Cognition and Constructivism", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 5(1), pp.11~26 (2008)
  43. Reilly, D. H, "Non-linear systems and educational development in Europe", Journal of Educational Administration, 37(5), pp.424~436 (2003)
  44. Richardson, George P, "Loop Polarity, Loop Dominance, and the Concept of Dominant Polarity", System Dynamics Review, 11(1), pp.67~88 (1984)
  45. Riegler, Alexander, "Editorial. The Constructivist Challenge", Constructivist Foundations, 1(1), pp.1~8 (2005)
  46. Semetsky, Inna, "Not by breadth alone : Imagining a Self-Organised Classroom", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2, pp.19~36 (2005)
  47. Senge, Peter M., "Schools That Learn: A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents and Everyone Who Cares About" (2000), Currency
  48. Sinclair, Margaret, "Complexity Theory and the Mathematics Lab-Classroom", Complicity : An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), pp.57~71 (2003)
  49. Sullivan, John P, "Emergent Learning : The Power of adaptive systems in the Classroom" (2010), LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co. KG

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)