본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2045년 한국의 교육분야 미래전망과 정책방향

Vision and Policy Direction in Educational Field of Korea in 2045

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study is to explore the future vision and policy direction in the educational fields of Korea in the next 30 years. This study starts from a diagnosis that the 'basics of education' are being destroyed seriously and has fallen far behind today in comparison with the rapid advance of the rest fields in society. The term 'basics of education' refers to the belief that humans develop through experiences of ‘subject immersion’―a state of absolute concentration on various subjects. This viewpoint suggests that humans have abilities to convert their life experiences into certain types of knowledge, and to allow participants of educational fields with great autonomy in educational planning. According to this view, education involves a system which provides everyone with opportunities to cultivate abilities and attitudes to work in each proper field. Here, the purpose of the future educational strategy lies in improving the educational power of schools. This study attempt to investigate future vision for education on the foundation of 'educational logic' rather than political, economical logic. The future vision is to construct an 'educational society'. Criticizing the approach with methodology of futurologists, this study sets forth a world view, in which it is the educational society that regulates economic society eventually. By emphasizing on 'subject immersion and 'educational power of schools', we can make clear that schools are social organizations to plan the experiences of subject immersion for all students in all circumstances, and that educational society shall be established with the structure to create the educational power of schools. This study suggests policies to improve learning abilities, to recover the educational power of schools, to manage the institutional connection between secondary education and higher education, to maintain the strong relation between education and the ability to function successfully in each field of work and finally, to build a bridge between schools and local culture. These policy directions will first reinstate the destroyed basics of education and ultimately become an institutional mechanism to lead substantial changes for educational society.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the future vision and policy direction in the educational fields of Korea in the next 30 years. This study starts from a diagnosis that the 'basics of education' are being destroyed seriously and has fallen far behind today in comparison with the rapid advance of the rest fields in society. The term 'basics of education' refers to the belief that humans develop through experiences of ‘subject immersion’―a state of absolute concentration on various subjects. This viewpoint suggests that humans have abilities to convert their life experiences into certain types of knowledge, and to allow participants of educational fields with great autonomy in educational planning. According to this view, education involves a system which provides everyone with opportunities to cultivate abilities and attitudes to work in each proper field. Here, the purpose of the future educational strategy lies in improving the educational power of schools. This study attempt to investigate future vision for education on the foundation of 'educational logic' rather than political, economical logic. The future vision is to construct an 'educational society'. Criticizing the approach with methodology of futurologists, this study sets forth a world view, in which it is the educational society that regulates economic society eventually. By emphasizing on 'subject immersion and 'educational power of schools', we can make clear that schools are social organizations to plan the experiences of subject immersion for all students in all circumstances, and that educational society shall be established with the structure to create the educational power of schools. This study suggests policies to improve learning abilities, to recover the educational power of schools, to manage the institutional connection between secondary education and higher education, to maintain the strong relation between education and the ability to function successfully in each field of work and finally, to build a bridge between schools and local culture. These policy directions will first reinstate the destroyed basics of education and ultimately become an institutional mechanism to lead substantial changes for educational society.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김민남, "추천사를 대신하여. 왜 교육정책은 역사를 불행하게 하는가", pp.23~33 (2014), 메디치
  2. 김민남, "한국교육론" (2007), 경북대학교출판부
  3. 김성기, "학업중단예방을 위한"학업 중단 숙려제"의 필요성과 효과", 서울교육, (봄)통권 : 210, pp.49~50 (2013)
  4. 김영철, "한국교육 비전 2020 : 세기의 대전환" (1996), 한국교육개발원
  5. 김영철, "한국교육 비전 2020 : 교육전략" (1998), 한국교육개발원
  6. 김영철, "한국교육 비전 2020(Ⅱ) : 한국교육의 발전 가능성과 미래모습" (1997), 한국교육개발원
  7. 김택환, "넥스트 코리아" (2013), 메디치
  8. 학습혁명 보고서, "매일경제신문사", 매일경제신문사, ~ (2000)
  9. 류청산, "인류의 미래와 교육" (2011), 강현출판사
  10. 고등교육 미래비전 2040 수립을 위한 정책 연구, "류현숙", 한국교육개발원, ~ (2011)
  11. 박영숙, "새로운 미래가 온다" (2009), 경향미디어
  12. 2020 미래교육보고서, "박영숙", 경향미디어, ~ (2010)
  13. 박영숙, "유엔미래보고서2030: 생존과 소멸의 갈림길 당신은 어느 쪽을 선택할 것인가" (2012), 교보문고
  14. 유엔미래보고서 2040, "박영숙", 교보문고, ~ (2013)
  15. 박재윤, "미래 교육비전 연구" (2010), 한국교육개발원
  16. 손종현, "대학 교양교육의 재개념화: 人材교육적 관점에서", 열린교육연구, 22(2), pp.307~329 (2014), 한국열린교육학회
  17. 손종현, "창의성 계발의 교육논리: 지식·문화 생산의 ‘이야기꾼’ 키우기", 교육철학, (54), pp.107~141 (2014), 한국교육철학회
  18. 이경숙, "교육열망과재생산", pp.51~78 (2013), 한국학술정보
  19. 미래 학교 모형 탐색 연구, "이혜영", 한국교육개발원, ~ (2008)
  20. 정범모, "교육력. 한국의 교육력, 이대로 좋은가", 한국교육학회2007년 춘계 학술대회 기조강연, pp.13~17 (2007), 한국교육학회
  21. 조용개, "교육과정 운영 실태에 관한 FGI 분석과 진단 : ‘무규범적 성과주의’의 실재성", 열린교육연구, 23(1), pp.187~213 (2015), 한국열린교육학회
  22. 21세기 창의적 인재 양성을 위한 교육의 미래전략 연구, "최상덕", 한국교육개발원, ~, pp.연구보고 RR 2011-01 (2011)
  23. 카이스트 미래전략대학원, "대한민국 국가미래전략 2015" (2014), 이콘출판(주)
  24. 한홍진, "(학교의 미래를 바꾸는)비전혁명 : 미래를 준비하는 학교들의 비전을 통한 학교 혁신" (2010), 두남
  25. Dewey, J, "학교와 사회" (1984), 박영사
  26. Dewey, J., "철학의 개조" (1960), 을유문화사
  27. Dewey, J., "Logic, The Theory of Inquiry" (1964), Holt, Rinehart and winston, Inc

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)